24th Sunday in Ordinary Time (year A)  [13 September 2026]

First Reading from the Book of Sirach (27:30–28:7)

In the teachings of the wise Ben Sira, who lived around 180 BC, shortly before the birth of Jesus, one can sense the gradual discovery of forgiveness in the Old Testament. Indeed, the Bible can be seen as God’s patient endeavour, through the prophets, to root out vengeance from our hearts. Cain was avenged seven times, and after him the spiral of violence had become so widespread that Lamech boasted of taking vengeance seventy times seven. It took a patient effort, through the laws and the preaching of the prophets, to reverse this trend. Ben Sira stands at the end of this chain of vengeance and highlights Israel’s realisation of how to bring it to an end. In today’s text, Ben Sira draws on three useful considerations to preach forgiveness.  First of all, we must not forget God’s constant faithfulness towards his people, who have, on the other hand, often been unfaithful to him. Furthermore, if you wish to observe God’s commandments, you cannot harbour a grudge against your neighbour, for the commandment to love your neighbour as yourself implies the ability to forgive. And finally, if we were to reflect on our own death, we would readily renounce all forms of hatred and vengeance. Ben Sira says: ‘This is why the Lord is patient with them and pours out his mercy upon them; he sees and knows that their lot is a painful one, for he abounds in forgiveness. Human mercy concerns one’s neighbour, whilst the Lord’s mercy concerns every living being (Sir 18:11–13). The wise man urges us to move beyond offences.  Moreover, in the phrase ‘the man who takes revenge will experience God’s vengeance’, there is a concrete truth that touches us deeply. It is these small steps in the spirit of mercy that prepare us to receive God’s mercy; and indeed, how can we imagine that God would be merciful towards us if we refuse even the smallest gesture of forgiveness towards others?  Finally, the last verse: ‘Remember the commandments and do not hate your neighbour’ leads us to reflect on the words of Jesus on the cross: ‘Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do’. It makes us realise that sometimes we do wrong without considering all the consequences, and divine forgiveness even goes so far as to suggest that we do wrong out of ignorance. The Ecumenical Translation of the Bible offers this rendering of the verse (28:7): ‘Remember God’s covenant and look beyond the offence’ – a beautiful definition of forgiveness. Of course, one cannot erase an offence, but one must know how to move beyond it. After a wound, the skin retains a scar, and it is the same for emotional wounds, for nothing can erase slander, a gesture of contempt or infidelity. Words and behaviour bear poisonous fruit, and one cannot simply turn back as if nothing had happened. As Ben Sira says, moving beyond does not mean ignoring the past, but trying to mend a relationship torn apart by an offence, whilst accepting the possibility of a new future. The word ‘forgiveness’ – ‘for’ and ‘gift’ – tells us that forgiveness which goes beyond the offence is possible, and that perfect forgiveness is, ultimately, the work of the Holy Spirit. 

Responsorial Psalm (102/103)

Psalm 102/103 contains 22 verses, as many as there are letters in the Hebrew alphabet. For this reason, it is called an alphabetic psalm and belongs to the tradition of psalms of thanksgiving for the Covenant. It is a great hymn of gratitude to God for all his gifts and blessings. Another feature of the psalm is its parallelism: each verse consists of two phrases that echo and complement one another, almost like a dialogue between two choirs. This style of expression is very common in the Bible and served both to aid memorisation and to deepen the meaning of the words. In the first verse, ‘Bless the Lord, O my soul; bless his holy Name, O my whole being’, the parallelism helps us to understand two important things. Firstly, in the Bible, the Name refers to the person himself: to bless the Name of the Lord therefore means to bless God in his entirety. Secondly, the word ‘soul’ does not simply refer to a spiritual part of a person as opposed to the body. In the biblical mindset, a person is seen as a unified being: ‘soul’ therefore means the whole person, one’s entire being. The psalm then emphasises God’s mercy: ‘He does not hold a grudge for ever, nor does he harbour his anger for ever. He does not treat us according to our sins, nor repay us according to our iniquities’. God does not follow the logic of ‘quid pro quo’, nor that of punishment proportionate to the offence. His logic is one of gratuitousness and mercy. The Bible shows how Israel gradually discovered the true face of God: not a God who keeps a record of our sins, but a God who is ‘gracious and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in love’ (Ex 34:6). This is the great biblical revelation: God is completely different from our human notions of justice and judgement. For this reason, even the expression ‘fear of God’ must be understood correctly. It does not mean being afraid of God. When we discover that God is a merciful Father, full of tenderness, fear can be transformed into a filial attitude. The fear of God, in the biblical sense, is therefore a profound respect combined with trust, gratitude and the desire to follow his will. It is like a child who listens to his father when he tells him not to go near the fire: he obeys not because he is afraid of his father, but because he knows that his father loves him and wants to protect him. The Psalm itself expresses this with a beautiful image: ‘As a father has compassion on his children, so the Lord has compassion on those who fear him.’ The spiritual journey therefore consists in transforming fear into trust, to the point of living before God as beloved children. God does not ask us for flawless perfection: when we fall, his mercy allows us to start again. His tenderness ‘passes over’ our sins and lifts us up again. It is the same tenderness that Jesus will show in the parable of the Merciful Father and the Prodigal Son. In summary: Psalm 102/103 invites us to bless God with our whole being and to recognise that his love is far greater than our faults. True ‘fear of God’ is not terror, but trust, respect and filial love. With God, we can always start afresh, because his mercy never fails.

A reading from the Letter of Saint Paul the Apostle to the Romans (14:7–9)

The central phrase of the text is ‘We belong to the Lord. None of us lives for ourselves, and none of us dies for ourselves’ (Rom 14:7). Saint Paul reminds us that we are not isolated individuals, independent of one another. Across time and space, we are deeply united. God’s plan is for humanity to be so united as to become one in Christ, a unity founded on the death and resurrection of Jesus, who has become ‘Lord of the dead and the living’. The problem is that divisions can arise even amongst Christians. In Paul’s time, the disputes centred mainly on dietary rules: some Christians, coming from a Jewish background, were very strict; others, coming from the pagan world, were more relaxed. Paul urges everyone not to judge one another: ‘Who are you to judge another’s servant?’ (Romans 14:4). The essential thing is not that we all have the same customs in living out our faith. What matters is that we all belong to Christ. Even today, divisions can arise from liturgical issues or from differing social and political views, because those who share the same faith and the same Baptism may make different choices. For Paul, no one should feel entitled to judge another: rather, each person should sincerely seek to serve the Lord according to their own conscience: ‘Whoever eats, eats for the Lord, for they give thanks to God; and whoever does not eat, does so for the Lord and gives thanks to God.’ This means that there is no single way to give thanks to God, and the same faith can be expressed in different ways. The true ‘spiritual sacrifice’ consists in offering one’s whole self to God, with sincerity and love, each person doing so according to what they consider right, in different and even opposing ways; but what matters is the sincere desire to serve God. Paul points out what must remain at the heart of the Christian life: ‘The kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit’ (Romans 14:17). We must seek what builds up the community, fosters peace and strengthens relationships; and the fundamental rule is mutual love: ‘Hold one another in high esteem’. This is the central message: Baptism makes us all belong to Christ, and for this reason our differences — in religious practices, sensibilities, and social or political choices — must not become a cause for judgement and division. What unites us is far more important than what divides us, and Christian maturity consists in respecting those who live their faith differently from us, refraining from judging them, knowing that we are all called to build peace, unity, respect and love, since ‘none of us lives for ourselves’: indeed, we all belong to the Lord.

From the Gospel according to Matthew (18:21–35)

The Gospel presents the parable of the unforgiving servant in three stages. 1. The king forgives the debt: a parable about God’s gratuitous love, which surpasses all our calculations. A servant had incurred an enormous debt to the king, one that was impossible to repay; according to the laws of the time, he and his family should have been imprisoned. The man, however, begged the king for patience and, moved to compassion, the king not only granted him more time but also forgave the debt entirely: ‘You owe me nothing more’. 2. The servant who cannot forgive. The same servant, as soon as he left, met a man who owed him a very small sum compared to what had been forgiven him; yet, instead of showing mercy, he immediately demanded payment and had him thrown into prison. He had received an immense gift, but was incapable of granting others even a small fraction of what he had received. For this reason, the king rebukes him: ‘Shouldn’t you too have shown mercy to your fellow servant, just as I showed mercy to you?’ 3. Forgiving without keeping score. Peter asks Jesus: ‘Lord, how many times must I forgive my brother? Up to seven times?’ Jesus replies: ‘Not seven times, but seventy times seven’, that is, without limit. Forgiveness must not become a matter of keeping score: we must not count how many times we have already forgiven or determine the limits of our obligation to do so. Jesus overturns the logic of the story of Cain and Lamech, where vengeance begets further vengeance and violence multiplies without end. Jesus sets Lamech’s boundless vengeance against boundless forgiveness; and so, in the Bible, God progressively leads humanity out of the spiral of violence: from the law of retaliation (an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth), which at least limits vengeance, we arrive at the discovery of forgiveness—a revelation that reaches its full fulfilment in the sacrifice of the Cross. But why does the servant in the parable forfeit the benefit of what he had received? Not because God ceases to give, but because our hearts can become incapable of receiving and passing on what they receive. It is like soil that has become dry and impermeable, where even a heavy downpour cannot penetrate it because it must first be tilled. In the same way, learning to forgive opens our hearts and makes us ready to receive once more what God offers us. A heart closed off by resentment becomes incapable of allowing itself to be transformed. The servant should have been so deeply grateful for the debt that had been forgiven him that he would not have refused his fellow servant’s request. The central point of the parable is that those who recognise what they have received become capable of giving it on in turn. We see this too in the episode of the woman caught in adultery (John 8). The accusers arrive with stones in their hands, ready to stone her; Jesus invites them first to look within themselves, and one by one they leave, starting with the elders, no longer feeling authorised to judge the adulteress because they are aware of their own frailty. The scene thus completes the message of this Sunday’s parable: before condemning another, remember that you too live thanks to God’s patience and goodness. A Christian is not someone who never makes mistakes, but someone who, having experienced the possibility of a fresh start, offers that same opportunity to others. We are truly converted when what we receive from God transforms the way we treat others.

+Giovanni D’Ercole

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time  (year A)  [6 September 2026]

First Reading from the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel (33:7–9)

The prophet Ezekiel, a priest in Jerusalem in the 6th century BC, was exiled to Babylon in 597 BC during the first exile ordered by Nebuchadnezzar. He lived by the River Chebar, in the village of Tel Aviv, where he learnt the tragic news of the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple in 587 BC. Despite these catastrophes, Ezekiel did not lose hope. During the approximately twenty years of his ministry whilst in exile, he dedicated his life to supporting the people and keeping alive the hope of return. The name of the modern city of Tel Aviv refers precisely to the village where he lived, as a tribute to the prophet who contributed to the spiritual survival of Israel. His mission unfolded on two fronts: helping the exiles to settle and survive; and keeping alive the hope of returning to the Promised Land. God entrusted him with the task of being a watchman for Israel (Ezekiel 3:17). Like a watchman who warns the city of danger, Ezekiel was to convey God’s warnings and call the people to repentance. Had he remained silent, he would have been responsible for their downfall. However, the people often listened without putting God’s Word into practice. People appreciated the beauty of his preaching, but did not change their ways (Ezekiel 33:31–32). For this reason, the prophet experienced discouragement, feeling as though he were ‘preaching in the wilderness’. Despite this, he remained faithful to his mission. Ezekiel was a watchman in two senses: attentive to the Word of God and vigilant in awaiting the dawn of salvation. With powerful imagery and great courage, he proclaimed the hope of rebirth, declaring God’s promise: ‘I will bring you out of your graves, O my people, and bring you back to the land of Israel’ (Ezekiel 37:12). Even when it seemed that all was lost, following the fall of Jerusalem, Ezekiel continued to proclaim that restoration was possible if the people returned to God. For God does not desire the death of the sinner, but his conversion: ‘Why should you die, O house of Israel? Turn back, and you will live’ (Ezek 33:11). This text ties in with today’s Gospel reading, in which Jesus entrusts the disciples with a similar mission: to watch over one another with brotherly love, correcting those who err because, as Leviticus (19:17–18) also teaches, correcting with charity is a genuine act of love, for it helps one’s brother to avoid evil and to find the path of life once more. Just as a watchman keeps watch over the city, so the prophet and every disciple must watch over the welfare of others.

Responsorial Psalm (94/95) 

The final verse of Psalm 95/94 recalls the episode of Massah and Meribah (Ex 17:1–7), when the people of Israel, in the wilderness, ran out of water and doubted God. After accusing Moses, thinking that God wanted to let them die of thirst, the Lord caused abundant water to gush forth from the rock. Since then, Massah and Meribah have symbolised a lack of trust in God. The Psalm urges: ‘Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts’. This is the life of faith, and the real question is: ‘Can we trust God, who is present in our lives?’ Faith is trust, and to believe means to trust. The Hebrew word for faith means to lean on God, and ‘Amen’ derives from the same root, meaning ‘firm’ or ‘stable’: it is like saying, ‘I entrust myself completely to God.’ This is why the prophet Isaiah declares: ‘Unless you believe, you will not stand firm’ (Isaiah 7:9). To listen is to trust. The invitation in the Psalm: ‘Will you listen to his Word today?’, asks not merely to hear, but to receive it with trust. Those who trust truly listen. This is why the Shema Israel prayer (Deut 6:4) begins with: ‘Hear, O Israel’, and to love God with all one’s heart means to entrust oneself entirely to Him. Even the verb ‘to obey’ derives from the idea of listening: biblical obedience is not blind submission, but trusting listening to the Word. Trust arises from experience. Israel bases its faith on the concrete experience of deliverance from Egypt. If God has delivered his people from slavery, he cannot abandon them in the wilderness. This is why the Psalm proclaims: ‘Let us acclaim the Rock of our salvation.’ The rock is not merely a poetic image: it recalls the rock from which God brought forth water at Massah and Meribah. God is a secure rock upon which to rely, and this choice must be renewed every day. The word ‘today’ is fundamental: every day is a new beginning; every day we can return to listening to God and trusting in Him. It is the same message proclaimed by Ezekiel to the discouraged exiles: do not lose hope and continue to trust in the Lord. Faith is not an individual matter, but belongs to a people walking together towards God, and this is why the Psalm is always in the plural: ‘We are the people whom God leads’. This communal dimension is a fundamental characteristic of the Bible and also represents a challenge for the Church today. The text concludes by reminding us that the very question of trust runs through the entire Bible: when Saint Paul calls on us to be reconciled with God, he asks us to stop doubting His intentions; when Jesus calls on us to be converted and to believe in the Gospel, He asks us to believe in the Good News – that is, that God loves us and wants what is best for us. Even the story of Adam and Eve can be read in this light: the fundamental test is not outward obedience, but the trust that God always desires our freedom, our life and our happiness. Faith consists in believing that, even in trials, limitations and defeats, God can bring forth new life, freedom and resurrection.

Second Reading from the Letter of Saint Paul the Apostle to the Romans (13:8–10)

If we are to find a central theme in this text, it is ‘dual loyalty: as a good citizen and as a disciple’. In other words, how to live as Christians in a non-Christian world. To understand this, we must place the text in its context. From chapter 12 of the Letter to the Romans, Paul offers advice to Christians on how to live as Christians in a world that is not our own. To live as a Christian is to make one’s life a ‘holy sacrifice’ (Paul’s text from last Sunday, in which he adds: ‘Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the will of God’ (Rom 12:2)). Today we are in Chapter 13, and Paul delves into the practicalities of social life: our relationship with the authorities. When one reads the whole chapter, one is struck by the specific details he gives regarding the obligations of citizens: respect for the courts, the payment of taxes and duties, and submission to all authorities. In short: a good Christian must be a good citizen: ‘Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities’ (Romans 13:1). Let us be frank: this instruction must have surprised more than a few, because the Jews and the Romans held two very different conceptions of power. In the Jewish world of the Old Testament, such words would not have surprised anyone, because political power lay in the hands of the religious authorities; civil law was not distinguished from the Law of God. From this perspective, Jesus had been able to say to the crowd and his disciples: ‘The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. Do and observe whatever they tell you’ (Mt 23:1–2). But the same could not be said of the Roman world; the authorities in question were the Roman emperors and the entire hierarchy of their governors, magistrates and soldiers, for whom God’s will was obviously the very last thing on their minds! And if Paul writes about not conforming to this world, it is because the ideal of Roman society was often diametrically opposed to the Christian ideal. So, is it possible to obey an authority steeped in paganism? This question lies at the heart of our text. Paul responds in two points:

First point: do not use faith as an excuse to shirk civil responsibilities, and he reasons as follows:  ‘There is no authority except that which God has established; the authorities that exist have been established by God’ (Romans 13:1), and here we hear an echo of Jesus’ words to Pilate: ‘You would have no power over me at all unless it had been given to you from above’ (John 19:11). Another argument: since in all countries the law is normally at the service of justice and the defence of the weak, Paul says: ‘The authorities are God’s servants for your good… for they are God’s agents of retribution, administering punishment to those who do wrong’ (Rom 13:4). The Jews, like the early Christians – the Romans made no distinction between them – were exempt from Roman laws that offended their conscience: for example, burning incense before the emperor’s statue, or performing military service. Therefore, says Saint Paul, obey the Roman laws, for one is not exempt from laws that are contrary to religion.

Second point: simply being in compliance is not enough; what is needed is the ‘debt of love’. One is not a good Jew or a good Christian merely by being in compliance with civil authority, for this does not take charity to its fullest extent. This is what the first sentence of today’s reading says: ‘Owe no one anything, except to love one another’ (Rom 13:8). ‘Owe no one anything’ – that is to say, it is not enough simply to be in good standing with everyone; one must go further. The ultimate meaning of the Torah is to love one’s brothers and sisters; in other words, it is not enough merely to refrain from murder, theft or adultery, because, as St Paul observes, all this is summed up in this: ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself’ (Rom 13:9), and this means being in accordance with the Law of Moses. Paul adds that a profound conversion is required, which he describes in these words: “Be transformed by the renewal of your mind, so that you may discern the will of God—what is good, pleasing and perfect” (Romans 12:2). The true novelty is revealed when Christ asks the rich young man, an observer of the Torah, to give up everything and follow him: ‘If you wish to be perfect, go, sell what you possess, give it to the poor… then come and follow me’ (Mt 19:21). A choice that can take one a long way!

From the Gospel according to Matthew (18:15–20)

Jesus teaches that fraternal correction is about saving the person, not condemning them. In the second reading, Saint Paul reminds us not to be in debt to anyone, except for the debt of mutual love, since love is the perfect fulfilment of the Law (Rom 13:8, 10). The whole of chapter 18 of the Gospel of Matthew deals, from various angles, with the fulfilment of this love in relationships within the Christian community. In particular, it addresses two themes: the priority given to the little ones and the weak, and mutual forgiveness. To introduce these recommendations, Jesus tells the parable of the lost sheep – an image well known to his listeners – and compares the leaders of the community to shepherds appointed by the supreme Shepherd, who is God; the heavenly Father does not want any of these little ones to be lost (Mt 18:14). This concerns the duty of mutual watchfulness, following the model already set out by Ezekiel: ‘Woe to the shepherds of Israel…’ (Ezek 34:2). Jesus entrusts the disciples with the task of watching over one another, ensuring that their brothers and sisters do not go astray; and this duty falls first and foremost to those in charge of the community—the shepherds. But the duty of mutual care also exists within the flock; not only do the shepherds bear responsibility for the well-being of the flock, but the sheep too are responsible for one another, as Ezekiel further writes: ‘Thus says the Lord God: I myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean… (Ezek 34:20–22). Ezekiel thus proclaimed that God himself would take charge of his flock once more through his Messiah: ‘I will raise up for them a single shepherd, who will tend them—my servant David. He will tend them; he will be their shepherd’ (Ezek 34:23). Jesus is the Good Shepherd who knows his sheep and by whom the sheep are known (cf. Jn 10), and he gives guidance for the life of the flock, particularly regarding fraternal support and help so that no one ‘is lost’. To bring back those who have gone astray requires a demanding love, for if you truly love someone, you are willing to do anything to rescue them if they are in danger. God is Love, and we are called to be like him, which is an incredibly demanding task. And if any Christian goes astray, Jesus shows the way forward: first, seek dialogue personally and do everything possible to help them rejoin the flock; and if, in the end, you are unable to do so, regard them as a pagan or a tax collector – which does not imply permanent exclusion. How, then, are we to interpret the phrase: ‘If they will not even listen to the community, let them be to you as a pagan and a tax collector’? In the light of all we know about Jesus and his constant welcome of tax collectors and sinners, this cannot be a definitive rejection but rather a respect for each person’s freedom… whilst waiting for Zacchaeus or the tax collector Matthew to be converted. What emerges from the approach recommended by Christ is the absolute necessity of respect for everyone, and in particular for those who call themselves sinners; and every step taken to restore communion must be marked by delicate discretion. These are the basic rules of life in the Church, and respecting them is the seed of eternal life: “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven” (Mt 18:18). Let us consider the final sentence: “For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them” (Mt 18:20). In the sayings of the Jewish Fathers (the Pirkei Avot), we read: “When two sit together and engage in the words of the Torah, the Shekinah—that is, the presence of God—is amongst them” (Avot 3:2).

+Giovanni D’Ercole

(Mt 1:1-16.18-23)

Since the 7th century, the event of the first Dawn preceding the Coming of the Sun of Justice has been identified by Pope Sergius in the birth of Mary - according to Dante «a fixed term of eternal counsel».

The Mother of God is a figure who in the panorama of spirituality brings a radical novelty, because she does not generate the awaited David, but rather the most humble and favorable Person, with non-aggressive energy.

In her icon of «newly generated girl», she is also an image of the different, but real humanity, "accomplice" of our condition; from the heart not more artificial and stone [legalist] but of flesh.

So today’s Feast is a sort of prefiguration of Christmas, an event of Revelation of a disconcerting but finally authentic Face of God - and of the realized creatures.

Here, then, we are asked by the Gospel about the weight to be given to the rigidity of the norms, which in the history of spirituality have often devoured the spontaneous being of those called by the Father.

Genuineness that simply stimulates to express oneself, starting from one’s own vocational character.

Even the cultures animated by Wisdom of Nature attest to its weight.

The Tao Tê Ching (LVII) writes: «When with correction the world is ruled, with falsehood weapons are used [...] For this the saint says: I do not act and the people are transformed by themselves [...] I do not crave and the people become simple».

In the ancient East the genealogies indicated only men, and it is surprising that Mt mentions the name of as many as five women, considered only slavish creatures, unreliable, impure by nature.

But in the story of Mary‘s four companions there is not a little a-normal (even for the chosen model of life) but that it is worth it.

In order to reach the human fullness of the Son, God did not claim to overcome historical events, but on the contrary He took them on and valued them.

The path that leads to Christ is not question of climbing, nor of results or performance to be calibrated better and better in a linear crescendo - therefore moralizing and dirigist, which does not impose turns that matter, nor solves the real problems.

In events, the Eternal manages to give wings unfolded not so much to strength and genius, but to all the poor origins, to the smallness of our nature, which suddenly turns into totally unpredictable wealth. 

And if we constantly tear the thread, the Lord re-ties it down - not to fix it, to put a patch on it and to resume as before, but to redo a whole new plot. Starting from the defeats.

It is the energy of inadequacy and failure that makes us re-enter ourselves and finally “lose” our minds. Other configurations of the soul await us.

In the Gospels of Childhood [in Mt] God takes on two Names: Redeemer [Yeshua: God is Savior] and With-us. The sense of these prerogatives is not mechanical, but theological.

The proper Name of the Son Jesus describes his Work of recovering the whole being.

And the characteristic attribute Immanu'El [taken from Isaiah] points all the sons - our (many) addresses, that we are each, growing over time.

Incarnation: the Father is placed at the side of his intimates.

Not only does He not fear to make himself impure in contact with things concerning the dynamics of the earth: He even recognizes himself in their Condition.

For this reason, Joseph‘s discomfort even gives rise to the culmination of the entire History of Salvation.

What is striking about Mt’s narration is: the possibility of irruption of the salvific Plan’s top spring not from a religious certainty, but from a Doubt!

Every eminent Gift passes through the “flesh”, and here - in the unsafe - what seemed controversial becomes fruitful.

Embarrassment and the improbable finally activate intense and full life.

The Spirit that slips into the holes of standard mentalities finds a ‘point’ within us that allows us to flourish differently now, in transparency.

The true turning points of history. The difference between devotion and Faith.

[Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary,  September 8]

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

With our great pilgrimage to Mariazell, we are celebrating the patronal feast of this Shrine, the feast of Our Lady’s Birthday. For 850 years pilgrims have been travelling here from different peoples and nations; they come to pray for the intentions of their hearts and their homelands, bringing their deepest hopes and concerns. In this way Mariazell has become a place of peace and reconciled unity, not only for Austria, but far beyond her borders. Here we experience the consoling kindness of the Madonna. Here we meet Jesus Christ, in whom God is with us, as today’s Gospel reminds us – Jesus, of whom we have just heard in the reading from the prophet Micah: “He himself will be peace” (5:4). Today we join in the great centuries-old pilgrimage. We rest awhile with the Mother of the Lord, and we pray to her: Show us Jesus. Show to us pilgrims the one who is both the way and the destination: the truth and the life.

The Gospel passage we have just heard broadens our view. It presents the history of Israel from Abraham onwards as a pilgrimage, which, with its ups and downs, its paths and detours, leads us finally to Christ. The genealogy with its light and dark figures, its successes and failures, shows us that God can write straight even on the crooked lines of our history. God allows us our freedom, and yet in our failures he can always find new paths for his love. God does not fail. Hence this genealogy is a guarantee of God’s faithfulness; a guarantee that God does not allow us to fall, and an invitation to direct our lives ever anew towards him, to walk ever anew towards Jesus Christ.

Making a pilgrimage means setting out in a particular direction, travelling towards a destination. This gives a beauty of its own even to the journey and to the effort involved. Among the pilgrims of Jesus’s genealogy there were many who forgot the goal and wanted to make themselves the goal. Again and again, though, the Lord called forth people whose longing for the goal drove them forward, people who directed their whole lives towards it. The awakening of the Christian faith, the dawning of the Church of Jesus Christ was made possible, because there were people in Israel whose hearts were searching – people who did not rest content with custom, but who looked further ahead, in search of something greater: Zechariah, Elizabeth, Simeon, Anna, Mary and Joseph, the Twelve and many others. Because their hearts were expectant, they were able to recognize in Jesus the one whom God had sent, and thus they could become the beginning of his worldwide family. The Church of the Gentiles was made possible, because both in the Mediterranean area and in those parts of Asia to which the messengers of Jesus travelled, there were expectant people who were not satisfied by what everyone around them was doing and thinking, but who were seeking the star which could show them the way towards Truth itself, towards the living God.

We too need an open and restless heart like theirs. This is what pilgrimage is all about. Today as in the past, it is not enough to be more or less like everyone else and to think like everyone else. Our lives have a deeper purpose. We need God, the God who has shown us his face and opened his heart to us: Jesus Christ. Saint John rightly says of him that only he is God and rests close to the Father’s heart (cf. Jn 1:18); thus only he, from deep within God himself, could reveal God to us – reveal to us who we are, from where we come and where we are going. Certainly, there are many great figures in history who have had beautiful and moving experiences of God. Yet these are still human experiences, and therefore finite. Only HE is God and therefore only HE is the bridge that truly brings God and man together. So if we Christians call him the one universal Mediator of salvation, valid for everyone and, ultimately, needed by everyone, this does not mean that we despise other religions, nor are we arrogantly absolutizing our own ideas; on the contrary, it means that we are gripped by him who has touched our hearts and lavished gifts upon us, so that we, in turn, can offer gifts to others. In fact, our faith is decisively opposed to the attitude of resignation that considers man incapable of truth – as if this were more than he could cope with. This attitude of resignation with regard to truth, I am convinced, lies at the heart of the crisis of the West, the crisis of Europe. If truth does not exist for man, then neither can he ultimately distinguish between good and evil. And then the great and wonderful discoveries of science become double-edged: they can open up significant possibilities for good, for the benefit of mankind, but also, as we see only too clearly, they can pose a terrible threat, involving the destruction of man and the world. We need truth. Yet admittedly, in the light of our history we are fearful that faith in the truth might entail intolerance. If we are gripped by this fear, which is historically well grounded, then it is time to look towards Jesus as we see him in the shrine at Mariazell. We see him here in two images: as the child in his Mother’s arms, and above the high altar of the Basilica as the Crucified. These two images in the Basilica tell us this: truth prevails not through external force, but it is humble and it yields itself to man only via the inner force of its veracity. Truth proves itself in love. It is never our property, never our product, just as love can never be produced, but only received and handed on as a gift. We need this inner force of truth. As Christians we trust this force of truth. We are its witnesses. We must hand it on as a gift in the same way as we have received it, as it has given itself to us.

“To gaze upon Christ” is the motto of this day. For one who is searching, this summons repeatedly turns into a spontaneous plea, a plea addressed especially to Mary, who has given us Christ as her Son: “Show us Jesus!” Let us make this prayer today with our whole heart; let us make this prayer above and beyond the present moment, as we inwardly seek the Face of the Redeemer. “Show us Jesus!” Mary responds, showing him to us in the first instance as a child. God has made himself small for us. God comes not with external force, but he comes in the powerlessness of his love, which is where his true strength lies. He places himself in our hands. He asks for our love. He invites us to become small ourselves, to come down from our high thrones and to learn to be childlike before God. He speaks to us informally. He asks us to trust him and thus to learn how to live in truth and love. The child Jesus naturally reminds us also of all the children in the world, in whom he wishes to come to us. Children who live in poverty; who are exploited as soldiers; who have never been able to experience the love of parents; sick and suffering children, but also those who are joyful and healthy. Europe has become child-poor: we want everything for ourselves, and place little trust in the future. Yet the earth will be deprived of a future only when the forces of the human heart and of reason illuminated by the heart are extinguished – when the face of God no longer shines upon the earth. Where God is, there is the future.

“To gaze upon Christ”: let us look briefly now at the Crucified One above the high altar. God saved the world not by the sword, but by the Cross. In dying, Jesus extends his arms. This, in the first place, is the posture of the Passion, in which he lets himself be nailed to the Cross for us, in order to give us his life. Yet outstretched arms are also the posture of one who prays, the stance assumed by the priest when he extends his arms in prayer: Jesus transformed the Passion, his suffering and his death, into prayer, and in this way he transformed it into an act of love for God and for humanity. That, finally, is why the outstretched arms of the Crucified One are also a gesture of embracing, by which he draws us to himself, wishing to enfold us in his loving hands. In this way he is an image of the living God, he is God himself, and we may entrust ourselves to him.

“To gaze upon Christ!” If we do this, we realize that Christianity is more than and different from a moral code, from a series of requirements and laws. It is the gift of a friendship that lasts through life and death: “No longer do I call you servants, but friends” (Jn 15:15), the Lord says to his disciples. We entrust ourselves to this friendship. Yet precisely because Christianity is more than a moral system, because it is the gift of friendship, for this reason it also contains within itself great moral strength, which is so urgently needed today on account of the challenges of our time. If with Jesus Christ and his Church we constantly re-read the Ten Commandments of Sinai, entering into their full depth, then a great, valid and lasting teaching unfolds before us. The Ten Commandments are first and foremost a “yes” to God, to a God who loves us and leads us, who carries us and yet allows us our freedom: indeed, it is he who makes our freedom real (the first three commandments). It is a “yes” to the family (fourth commandment), a “yes” to life (fifth commandment), a “yes” to responsible love (sixth commandment), a “yes” to solidarity, to social responsibility and to justice (seventh commandment), a “yes” to truth (eighth commandment) and a “yes” to respect for other people and for what is theirs (ninth and tenth commandments). By the strength of our friendship with the living God we live this manifold “yes” and at the same time we carry it as a signpost into this world of ours today.

“Show us Jesus!” It was with this plea to the Mother of the Lord that we set off on our journey here. This same plea will accompany us as we return to our daily lives. And we know that Mary hears our prayer: yes, whenever we look towards Mary, she shows us Jesus. Thus we can find the right path, we can follow it step by step, filled with joyful confidence that the path leads into the light – into the joy of eternal Love. Amen.

[Pope Benedict, homily, 8 September 2007]

Today we celebrate "with joy the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary: from her arose the sun of justice, Christ, our God!"

This Marian feast is an invitation to joy, precisely because with the birth of Mary Most Holy, God gave the world a concrete guarantee that salvation was now imminent: humanity, which for millennia, in more or less conscious ways, had been waiting for something or someone who could free it from pain, evil, anguish and despair, and which had found in the Chosen People, especially in the Prophets, the spokespeople of the reassuring and consoling Word of God, could finally look, moved and anxious, to Mary "the Child," who was the point of convergence and arrival of a complex of divine promises, mysteriously echoed in the very heart of history.

It is precisely this Child, still small and fragile, who is the 'Woman' of the first announcement of future Redemption, set by God in opposition to the tempting serpent: 'I will put enmity between you and the woman, between your offspring and her offspring: he will crush your head and you will strike his heel!' (Gen 3:15).

It is precisely this Child who is the 'Virgin' who 'will conceive and bear a Son, who will be called Emmanuel, which means: God with us' (cf. Is 7:14; Mt 1:23).

It is precisely this Child who is the "Mother" who will give birth in Bethlehem to "the one who is to be ruler over Israel" (cf. Mt 5:1f).

Today's liturgy applies to Mary the passage from the Letter to the Romans in which St Paul describes God's merciful plan for the elect: Mary is predestined by the Trinity for a very high mission; she is called; she is sanctified; she is glorified.

God predestined her to be intimately associated with the life and work of his only-begotten Son. For this reason, he sanctified her in a wonderful and unique way from the first moment of her conception, making her "full of grace" (cf. Lk 1:28); he made her conform to the image of his Son: a conformity that, we can say, was unique, because Mary was the first and most perfect disciple of the Son.

God's plan for Mary culminated in that glorification which made her mortal body conform to the glorious body of the risen Jesus. Mary's assumption into heaven, body and soul, represents the final stage in the story of this creature, in whom the heavenly Father manifested his divine pleasure in an exalted manner.

The whole Church, therefore, cannot fail to rejoice today in celebrating the Nativity of Mary Most Holy, who - as St John Damascene movingly affirms - is that 'virginal and divine door, from which and through which God, who is above all things, is about to make his bodily entrance into the world... Today a shoot has sprung from the trunk of Jesse, from which a Flower substantially united with the divinity will be born into the world. Today, on earth, from earthly nature, He who once separated the firmament from the waters and raised it high, has created a heaven, and this heaven is far more divinely splendid than the first!" (St John Damascene, Homily on the Nativity of Mary: PG 96,661s).

3. Looking to Mary means mirroring ourselves in a model that God himself has given us for our elevation and sanctification.

And Mary today teaches us first of all to keep intact our faith in God, the faith that was given to us in Baptism and that must continually grow and mature in us throughout the various stages of our Christian life. Commenting on the words of St. Luke (Lk 2:19), St. Ambrose expresses himself thus: "We recognise in everything the modesty of the Holy Virgin, who, unblemished in body as well as in words, meditated in her heart on the matters of faith" (St Ambrose, Expos. Evang. sec. Lucam, II, 54: CCL, XIV, p. 4). We too, dear brothers and sisters, must continually meditate in our hearts on "the things concerning the faith"; that is, we must be open and receptive to the Word of God, so that our daily life - on a personal, family and professional level - may always be in perfect harmony and coherence with the message of Jesus, with the teaching of the Church, and with the examples of the Saints.

Mary, the Virgin Mother, reaffirms to us all today the supreme value of motherhood, the glory and joy of women, and also that of Christian virginity, professed and accepted 'in view of the Kingdom of Heaven' (cf. Mt 19:12), that is, as a testimony, in this transitory world, of that final world, in which the saved will be "like the angels of God" (cf. Mt 22:30).

[Pope John Paul II, homily in Frascati, 8 September 1980]

"Everything is in the small things." God's style of acting in small things but opening up great horizons for us was the focus of Pope Francis' meditation during Mass celebrated at Santa Marta on Tuesday, 8 September, the liturgical memorial of the Nativity of Mary.

Referring to the text of the opening prayer recited shortly before — in which the Lord is asked for "the grace of unity and peace" — the Pontiff focused on two verbs already highlighted in his homilies of "recent days": to reconcile and to pacify. God, he said, "reconciles: he reconciles the world with himself and in Christ." Jesus, brought to us by Mary, the peacemaker, "gives peace to two peoples, and makes two peoples into one: the Jews and the Gentiles. One people. He makes peace. Peace in hearts." But, the Pope asked, "how does God reconcile?" What is his "style"? Perhaps he "holds a large assembly? Do they all agree? Do they sign a document?" No, he replied, "God pacifies in a special way: he reconciles and pacifies in small ways and along the way."

Francis' reflection then began with the concept of "small," that "small" mentioned in the first reading (Micah 5:1-4): "And you, Bethlehem of Ephrathah, so small..." This was the Pope's comment: "So small: but you will be great, because your leader will be born from you and he will be peace. He himself will be peace," because from that "small" "comes peace." This is God's style, who chooses "small things, humble things to do great works." The Lord, the Pope explained, "is the Great One" and we "are the little ones," but the Lord "advises us to make ourselves small like children in order to enter the kingdom of Heaven," where "the great, the powerful, the proud, the arrogant cannot enter." God, therefore, "reconciles and pacifies in the small."

The Pontiff then addressed the second concept, according to which the Lord reconciles "even on the way: walking". And he explained: "The Lord did not want to pacify and reconcile with a magic wand: today — bang! — everything done! No. He set out to walk with his people". An example of this action of God can be found in the Gospel of the day (Matthew 1:1-16, 18-23). This passage, the genealogy of Jesus, may seem a little repetitive: "This begot this, this begot this, this begot this... It is a list," Francis pointed out. Yet, he explained, "it is God's journey: God's journey among men, good and bad, because in this list there are saints and there are criminal sinners."

A list, therefore, where we also encounter "much sin." However, "God is not afraid: he walks. He walks with his people. And on this journey, he increases the hope of his people, the hope in the Messiah." This is the "closeness" of God. Moses said to his people: "But think: what nation has a God as close to them as we do?" So "this walking in small ways, with his people, this walking with the good and the bad, gives us our way of life." To "walk as Christians," to "pacify" and "reconcile" as Jesus did, we have the way: "With the Beatitudes and with that protocol by which we will all be judged. Matthew 25: 'Do this: small things.'" This means "in small things and on the journey."

At this point, the Pope added another element. The people of Israel, he said, 'dreamed of liberation', they had 'this dream because it had been promised to them'. Joseph also 'dreams', and his dream 'is a bit like a summary of the dream of this whole story of God's journey with his people'. But, Francis added, "it is not only Joseph who has dreams: God dreams. Our Father God has dreams, and he dreams beautiful things for his people, for each one of us, because he is a Father and, being a Father, he thinks and dreams the best for his children."

In conclusion: "This almighty and great God teaches us to do the great work of pacification and reconciliation in small ways, on our journey, without losing hope in that ability" to have "great dreams" and "great horizons."

Therefore, the Pontiff invited everyone — in this commemoration of the beginning of a decisive stage in the history of salvation, the birth of Our Lady — to ask for "the grace we have asked for in prayer, for unity, that is, for reconciliation and peace." But "always on the journey, in closeness with others" and "with great dreams." With the style of the "small", that smallness, he recalled, which is found in the Eucharistic celebration: "a small piece of bread, a little wine...". In "this 'smallness' there is everything. There is God's dream, there is his love, there is his peace, there is his reconciliation, there is Jesus".

[Pope Francis, St. Martha, in L'Osservatore Romano 09/09/2015]

I read in the newspaper that some peacocks have invaded a small town.

The news was published some time ago – except that a few days ago the newspaper reported that a man had run some of them over in his car. 

And so here is a starting point for reflection.

The peacock is one of the most fascinating animals; it has long been a symbol of beauty. 

It generally represents self-indulgence. And everything centres on outward appearance.

The female peacock is less showy than the male; she is smaller, and unlike the male, when she displays her tail in a fan-shaped spread, she does not have the colourful feathers. 

There is also the well-known Aesop’s fable in which a crow adorns itself with a peacock’s feathers to look beautiful.

In Greek mythology, the peacock was the symbol of the goddess Juno: the plumage of its tail is said to derive from the giant Argus Panoptes, who had a hundred eyes.

Upon his death, the goddess placed his eyes on the peacock’s tail.

According to more ancient traditions, the peacock, with its eyes and the splendid colours of its tail, evokes the starry sky, and was often associated with the idea of immortality.

Peacock-like behaviour also exists amongst human beings.

Men, too, spread their ‘tail’.

And here, too, it is all a question of degree.

It is one thing to show one’s ‘tail’ now and then or when asked; it is quite another to go through life with one’s tail constantly spread, perpetually on display.

I think it must also be tiring – first of all for oneself, and then for others as well.

Just as the peacock spreads its tail to be noticed and to attract female peacocks, the ‘peacock-like’ individual flaunts all their ‘talents’ to attract admiration and win public approval.

Here too, I should clarify: the normal desire to show one’s best side is not the same as the psychopathological condition characterised by a lack of empathy and an incessant, destructive sense of grandeur. 

Such attitudes do not concern only individuals: often, such behaviours also affect people when they become parents.

They prioritise their own image above all else, even before the child’s needs and emotional requirements, seeking the admiration of their children and craving the approval of those around them.

With parents like this, children do not thrive; they must constantly seek the affection of adults, which should instead be given freely. 

These parents want to appear perfect and expect their children to mirror them: their children, too, must be better than others, through academic success, physical fitness or stylish clothing. 

But this façade, this beautiful ‘peacock’s tail’, conceals some serious issues.

Such parents rarely take responsibility for their own behaviour. When they do something inappropriate, they almost never apologise.

They put on an air of superiority to conceal their own weaknesses.

We sometimes behave inappropriately towards our children – but we must not always give the impression that we have acted correctly.

The child’s reaction may well be justified.

If we insist on always being right, we risk confusing our children about how to perceive reality.

The ‘peacock’ parent then perceives every request from their child for personal growth and autonomy as an offence.

And in adulthood, establishing healthy boundaries or emotional distance becomes a difficult struggle.

Often, this type of parent also demands their children’s constant attention, and every relationship their children form becomes a source of suspicion or jealousy.

These parents become manipulative and often undermine the foundations of independence and autonomy.

Growing up with such individuals or parents can give rise to insecure behaviour, with a likelihood of developing anxious, doubtful attitudes, as the child unconsciously feels compelled to satisfy the demands of others.

I have touched upon the subject of ‘peacock parents’ because, having worked in the field of child development, I have frequently observed such attitudes more prominently in parental figures and only secondarily in children.

I would like to mention or recall a concept from Jung: the child’s unconscious stems from the parental unconscious.

I have also noticed that showing off was more common amongst professional parents – people with a high level of education.

In these cases, due to their behaviour, resolving the situation became complicated.

Very often, these parents decided for themselves when to end psychotherapy, either because they grew tired of accompanying their child to sessions, or because they felt personally implicated – and so they distanced themselves from the process.

Looking back at the last short article – entitled «the histrionic» [«l’istrione»] – it occurs to me that it rhymes with «peacock» [«pavone»].

As always, these reflections are drawn from my specialist training and from my practical experience in my professional work – primarily in the field of child and adolescent psychology. 

Dr Francesco Giovannozzi – psychologist – psychotherapist

Different concerns, and Humanizing Action

(Lk 6:6-11)

Providing good and uplifting the real person - as he or she is, in his or her uniqueness - is the only absolute value; the criterion of the entire Gospel.

Even the Torah in its core and sense wanted to be an important means of human, personal, religious pedagogy - not the end.

The norms accompany us willingly, when they facilitate the way to dialogue with the Lord in us and in our brothers and sisters. But the "letter" is cold and unfounded in itself.

Once the Meeting has taken place, priority must be given to God’s Project, solicitous to realize and make us flourish; not to procedures.

In fact, the prescriptions put everyone and always on alert towards the ‘different need’.

For this reason, solidarity and fraternity are placed above any devotional and identity homage, or doctrinal necessity, as well as external observance of worship (if lived by automatons).

The same norms must be understood so that they lead to life with and in Christ - for the realization and fullness of being.

Otherwise the scrupulous virtue of religion turns into malicious action and vice of faith - which loses the totality of the person [v.9 Greek text].

In this way, on synagogue day, there is no need to celebrate a restoration that stamps the clock.

Rather, we gather in assembly to better restore women and men to their dignity as sublime beings, to be promoted in an unlimited way.

The Sabbath of the Messiah is not a day of custom’s partiality: it is a time of recovered well-being - of Liberation and Creation, of promotion of the vital energies, according to the original and full Plan of the Father.

In fact, in the place of the habitual rite, where the traditional compressed mentality prevails, Jesus does not go to pray, but to teach and cure.

Not even the paralyzed person had asked for healing - so much it seemed normal to him to be there in that way and not to receive attention or any stimulus; not even the good.

Nevertheless, Love is the core and essence of the Law: even in the precept day, help was allowed by same prescriptions, in case of extreme need or repercussion on others.

Jesus is saying that unlocking the person who cannot do anything good [«right hand, arid»: v.6] is a matter of life or death, even for the whole community [heal or «annihilate»: v.9].

Observing the Lord’s day means, even for us: strengthening the expressive possibilities of humanity and reintegrating it into a ‘new order’.

In order to fulfil the redemptive 'precept', deviant attitudes must first also be assumed, and saved - like preparatory energies for new arrangements.

We cannot afford further neglect.

The crisis that affects everyone leaks the difference between... unconscious content, and truth; fossilizations and hidden energies; religiosity and Faith - character of life in Christ and in the Spirit.

In its sides of limitation and Completeness, legalism or Liberation, stasis and Rebirth, return to "as always" or Regeneration, formalism and Joy [so on], today discernment becomes more acute.

[Monday 23rd wk. in O.T.  September 7, 2026]