Fear is one of the most terrible enemies of our Christian life. Jesus exhorts: “have no fear”, “fear not”. And Jesus describes three tangible situations that they will find themselves facing.

First and foremost the hostility of those who would like to stifle the Word of God, by sugar-coating it, watering it down, or by silencing those who proclaim it. In this case, Jesus encourages the Apostles to spread the message of salvation that He has entrusted to them. For the moment, He has transmitted it cautiously, somewhat covertly, among the small group of disciples. But they will utter his Gospel “in the light”, that is, openly; and will proclaim it “upon the housetops” — as Jesus says — that is, publicly.

The second difficulty that Christ’s missionaries will encounter is the physical threat against them, that is, direct persecution of them personally, to the point of being killed. This prophesy by Jesus is realized in every age: it is a painful reality, but it attests to the faithfulness of witnesses. How many Christians are persecuted even today throughout the world! They suffer for the Gospel with love, they are martyrs of our days. And we can say with confidence that they are more numerous than those of the earliest times: so many martyrs, just for the fact of being Christians.

[...] We should not allow ourselves to be frightened by those who seek to extinguish evangelizing power with arrogance and violence. Indeed, they can do nothing against the soul, that is, against communion with God: no one can take this away from disciples, because it is a gift from God. The only fear that a disciple should have is that of losing this divine gift, closeness, friendship with God, giving up living according to the Gospel, thereby acquiring moral death, which is the effect of sin.

Jesus indicates as the third type of test that the Apostles will have to face, the sensation, which some may feel, that God himself has abandoned them, remaining distant and silent. Here too, Jesus exhorts them not to fear, because even while experiencing these and other pitfalls, the life of disciples lies firmly in the hands of God who loves us and looks after us. They are like three temptations: to sugar-coat the Gospel, to water it down; second: persecution; and third: the feeling that God has left us alone. Even Jesus suffered this trial in the Garden of Olives and on the Cross: “Father, why have you forsaken me?”, Jesus asks. At times one feels this spiritual barrenness; we must not fear it. The Father takes care of us, because our value is great in His eyes. What matters is frankness, the courage of our witness, our witness of faith: “recognizing Jesus before men” and going forth doing good.

[Pope Francis, Angelus 21 June 2020]

(Jn 5:31-47)

«But I have a greater testimony than John» (Jn 5:36). «Jesus loved others in the Father, starting from the Father – and thus he loved them in their true being, in their reality» [Pope Benedict].

Jesus does not love the catwalks. The Son remains immersed in the Father: he does not receive support and glory from men nor from “perimeters”, because he is not impregnated with ‘normal’ expectations.

Predictable hopes delay the budding of the Kingdom, of its alternative caliber - in the living experience of further exchanges; in the completeness of being that belongs to us.

The pathology of reputation, of accredited beliefs and practices in accordance with the context, excludes the blow of wings. But every short and rigid perspective rejects God in the name of God.

Only what is not petrified testifies Christ the Lord, the likeness of the Father who doesn’t reject our eccentricities, because he wants to make them grow - recovering the flourishing opposites.

The same "bad moments" that crumble prestige are also a spring to activate ourselves and not to stagnate in the same situations as always; by regenerating, proceeding elsewhere.

In short, our Heaven is intertwined with the flesh that transmutes, with the earth and our dust: It’s inside and below, not behind the clouds or in manners.

In John there is often the aspect of trial (religious) court to which the story of Jesus was subjected.

Sometimes men's aspirations are strangely hinged on the need to recognize one another, whatever it takes. But in this way we always remain “the same as before”.

Our world... centered on the honor that’s received. Theme is: the «Glory» - which however becomes a dialogue between deaf.

«Doxa» in the Greek world means a manifestation of prestige, honor, esteem.

In Hebrew, the term Glory [Kabôd] indicates specific, qualitative ‘weight’ (and manifestation) of the transcendent.

So the ‘glory’ that man gives to God - so to speak - is the opposite of the Hellenist criterion: a humble and grateful recognition, of familiar and humanizing ‘weight’.

No one is called to artificial prestige and strength. The Glory of Jesus himself was only the awareness and confession of being sent by the Father.

Nothing else is due to us.

The failures that put fame in the balance serve to make us realize what we hadn’t noticed, therefore to deviate from a conformist destiny.

The Way in the Spirit is inspired by a dimension of Mystery and Freedom to be discovered: Exodus.

The cages [even "spiritual"] blame everyone who’s different, inculcate tormenting thoughts, curb the most fruitful oddities.

These frames don’t awaken creativity, on the contrary they anesthetize it according to an internal cliché: precisely where one takes «glory from each other» (v.44).

“Prisons” do not teach how to give life momentum in a personal way and at the right time; and even the rhythm does not modulate itself on the different inclinations, on their originality - unique richness, which prepares the unrepeatable and extravagant New.

In fact, the unilateral imprint doesn’t respect nature, so it reinforces what says it wants to drive away. A disaster for a life of meaning and witness in Christ.

The Lord had as his only daily worship - in fact - the void of social support (it did not accept his deviations) and the fullness of the dawning in the Father.

[Thursday 4th wk. in Lent, April 3, 2025]

The greatest Witness

(Jn 5:31-47)

"Christians are a priestly people for the world. Christians should make the living God visible to the world, bear witness to Him and lead it to Him".

"Jesus loved men in the Father, from the Father - and so loved them in their true being, in their reality."

[Pope Benedict].

Jesus does not love catwalks. The Son remains immersed in the Father: he does not receive support and glory from fashionable men or ancient perimeters, because he is not imbued with normal human cultural religious expectations.

They prevent the perception of what we do not know, therefore they conceal the exceptional nature of the particular name; they drench the head and the gaze with current and pedestrian normality, which condition, dissociate, plagiarise, make external.

Predictable expectations delay the germination of the Kingdom of God and its alternative character - in the living experience of further exchanges; of other interpersonal qualities, in the completeness of being that belongs to us.

The specific weight of this unprecedented present and future, which corresponds because it is part of our intimate essence, otherwise remains in the hands of obvious opinions and the usual cheap dragging, which does not expose.

The pathology of reputation, of accredited convictions and the concordant praxis on the side, precludes winging it. But every short, rigid hope rejects God for God's sake.

Only that which is not petrified and conventional bears witness to Christ the Lord, the likeness of the Father who does not reject our eccentricities: he wants to make them grow - recovering their flourishing opposites.

The same 'no moments' that crumble prestige are also a spring to activate us and not stagnate in the same old situations; regenerating, moving forward elsewhere.

Failures that put fame in the balance serve to make us realise what we had not noticed, thus deviating from a conformist destiny.

In short, our Heaven is intertwined with our transmuting flesh, our earth and our dust: it lies within and below, not behind the clouds or in the manners.

In the paradoxical deification of the coming God, the all-worldly mentality of every purist or conformist circle experiences a reversal. Cipher of the great Wisdom of nature.

This is how Master Lü Hui-ch'ing comments on a famous passage from the Tao Tê Ching (LXXVI): "Heaven is on high for ch'ì, Earth is on low for form: ch'ì is soft and weak, form is hard and strong".

The trial-religious aspect to which the story of Jesus [even his intimates] was subjected often appears in John.

The aspirations of the pious men of old are strangely hinged on the need to make a body and recognise one another. Hence always 'those from before'.

Their world, centred on the honour one receives: the theme is Glory - which, however, becomes a dialogue between the deaf. 'Doxa' in the Greek world means manifestation of prestige, honour, esteem.

In Hebrew, the term Glory [Kabôd] means specific, qualitative weight (and manifestation) of the transcendent.

Thus the glory that man gives to God - so to speak - is the opposite of the Hellenist criterion: the principle and evaluation typical of the strutting, 'free', independent and self-confident hero [because of the prestige around].

Conversely, here is 'glory' as humble and grateful recognition, but weighty in the Christian sense: familiar and humanising.

The woman and man called to a particular mission discover in themselves and in reality the conditions of perfection and imperfection.

They lead us to innate fulfilment - not volatile - and the common good, according to specific, personal contribution.

No one is called to artificial prestige and strength, adding something to the honour of what is already in one's vocational essence - sometimes in paradoxical completeness, for a conviviality of differences.

The Glory of Jesus himself was only the awareness and confession of being the Father's Envoy.

That is all that is due to us - also in the sense of growth, of importance in itself, more than "those who become aware".

The devout groups unfortunately not infrequently moved to a level of worldly aspirations - just with a strange mixture of criteria.

So they ended up appreciating each other in circles, patting each other on the back.

Thus - content to be confirmed - they still tend to accentuate the characteristics of what is normally identified as the spiritual dimension, and that easily becomes tainted with the compromise of the artificial external look.

Instead, the inner balance of the Called by Name is re-established through dreams and congenital character - rather than through weighing and the raw influences of conscious life, which distract and level the soul. 

On such a slope, in fact, everyone tends to adopt attitudes that do not fit the very original vocation; on the contrary, they expose the conscience to dissociations and conditioning that distort it.

The Way in the Spirit of Freedom, Love, Newness, is inspired by a dimension of Mystery and spontaneity all to be discovered: Exodus.

Such a character proceeds beyond compartments, denominations filled with established solutions, with conformist thinking hooked on an univocal way of reading the Scriptures and testimonies.

Cages, even 'spiritual' ones, guilt every different, inculcate brooding, curb the most fruitful eccentricities.

In order to ensure 'ecclesial' compactness, the various stigmas everywhere play on the inadequacy of the majority interpretation - and guilt typical of the particular 'container'.

Such frameworks do not awaken creativity, rather they anaesthetise it according to internal clichés: where precisely they take "glory from one another" (v.44).

Frames do not teach one to launch oneself personally and at the right time.

The rhythm, too, does not descend on dissimilar inclinations, on their atypicality - a unique richness that prepares the unrepeatable and extravagant New that we do not already know.

Instruction booklets harass us with other people's progressions and goals to reach, all of which turn out to be yet to be surpassed - and outside our own taste and intimate sense; projected into the future, impersonal.

The 'spiritual' path of the pack reflects the life, judgement or idea of the leader and his 'magic' circle; the forma mentis of a generation or a class.

In this way, established trajectories do not announce changes and authentic encounters, which take place in the propulsive, transversal simplicity of the concrete unpredictable.

Stubborn models do not make us aware of a God Person: He calls to life through impulses that would be new blood for transmutation.

The Eternal One communicates Himself in what He speaks within.

Precisely in the needs - not obsessing energies known only to the soul, of conflicts over useless duties, which neither solve anything nor transmit happiness.

The 'egocentric' religious ideology and all directed thought brand crises as inadequacies to collective purposeful action - thus condemning instincts.

But instincts manifest themselves as escapes of the individual heart that seeks a new hearing, desires to surface and realise; it wants to integrate in its own way, or chart paths that prepare for the future.

Not infrequently, the evocation of the usual delimited rituals - e.g. of 'charisma' - as well as the concatenation of normative constitutions, deaden the character in a levelled atmosphere, which drinks of recollected attunements.

They are not our land.

The barnyard of the 'system' operates according to directives and roles.

But compartments limit the range of action, although they seemingly dilute it.

Trivial inclusions 'teach' us to be content with half-steps already chiselled into the little and not over the top.

This is so as not to allow one to enter the regenerations that count.

The self-referential clan often takes away space from any possibility that moves from there.

This makes one dependent on applause. It slows down, when conversely we could dare....

Lest we continue to perceive healthy restlessness. Differences that would redeem us from subordination.

In fact, the one-sided imprint does not respect nature, so it reinforces what it says it wants to banish.

A disaster for a life of meaning and witness in Christ.

The Lord had as his only daily worship - precisely - the emptiness of social support (which did not accept his deviations) and the fullness of beginnings in the Father.

"But I have a greater witness than John, for the works that the Father has given me to do, the very works that I do, testify of me that the Father has sent me" (John 5:36).

To internalise and live the message:

How do you safeguard community living and your transpositions of Faith in Christ?

What is the point of homologation in satisfaction, and where do you place your Preciousness?

Finger pointing: provisional but sure and strong

The commitment of all Christians is to "be witnesses of Jesus", to fill life with "that gesture" that was typical of John the Baptist: "pointing to Jesus". A common "vocation" on which Pope Francis dwelt in his homily during the Mass celebrated at Santa Marta on Friday morning, 16 December.

Following the liturgical path that over the past three days has made us reflect "on John, the last of the prophets, the greatest man born of a woman", the Pontiff delved into the Gospel passage (John 5, 33-36) in which the forerunner "is presented, is shown as the witness". It is Jesus himself who speaks clearly: "You sent messengers to John and he bore witness". Precisely this, Francis emphasised, "is John's vocation: to be a witness".

A vocation made even more comprehensible by some concrete examples. Jesus in fact, the Pope recalled, said that John 'was the lamp'. However, he explained, "he was the lamp but not the light, the torch that indicated where the light was, a lamp that indicated where the light was, a witness to the light". Likewise, John 'was the voice', so much so that he himself 'says of himself, "I am the voice crying out in the wilderness"'. But he was not the Word, in fact "he was the voice but who bears witness to the Word, he points to the Word, the Word of God. He only voice'. And so the Baptist who "was the preacher of penance" says clearly: "After me comes another who is stronger than I, he is greater than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to lace. And this one will baptise you in fire and the Holy Spirit'. To sum up: 'Lamp pointing to the light, voice pointing to the Word, preacher of penance and baptiser pointing to the true baptiser in the Holy Spirit'. John, the Pope concluded, 'is the provisional and Jesus is the definitive. John is the provisional who points to the definitive'.

But precisely this provisionality, this 'being for', is 'the greatness of John'. A man 'always with his finger there', pointing to another. In fact, in the Gospel we read that "people wondered in their hearts if John was not the Messiah. And he, clear: "I am not"'. And even when the doctors, the leaders of the people asked him: "But are you or must we wait for another?" he always repeated: "I am not. Another comes', again reminding him that one would come to whom he was not worthy to lace his shoes: 'I am not. Another, who will baptise you'.

It is precisely this, according to the Pontiff, the most eloquent image that tells us who John the Baptist was, his "provisional but sure, strong witness", his being "a torch that did not let itself be extinguished by the wind of vanity" and "a voice that did not let itself be diminished by the force of pride". John, the Pope clarified, is "always one who points to the other and opens the door to the other testimony, that of the Father, that which Jesus says today: 'I, however, have a testimony superior to that of John, that of the Father'. And, the Pontiff added, when we read in the Gospel that "the voice of the Father was heard: 'This is my Son'", we must understand that "it was John who opened this door".

Therefore John "is great", because "he always leaves himself aside". He, Francis explained, is great because 'he is humble and takes the path of lowering himself, of annihilating himself, the same path that Jesus will take later'. And also in this 'he offers a great witness: he opens that road of annihilation, of emptying himself' that was also Jesus' later.

A role that the Baptist incarnated, one could say, even physically: "to the disciples, to his own disciples, once Jesus passed by" he would point with his finger: "That is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. That one, not me". And in the face of 'the insistence of the leaders, the people, the doctors' John always repeated: 'It is necessary for Him to grow, for Him to grow, for me to diminish'. In humility, the Pontiff said, "is the greatness of John". So much so that he "diminishes, he annihilates himself, to the end: in the darkness of a cell, in prison, beheaded, for the whim of a dancer, the envy of an adulteress and the weakness of a drunkard".

Several times the Pope, to underline the concept, repeated the expression "Great John!". A great one who, he added, if we were to depict him in a painting, we should simply draw a finger pointing.

At the conclusion of his homily, the Pope brought his meditation, as usual, to the concrete reality of people today. Seeing that there were a number of bishops, priests, religious, and couples celebrating their fiftieth anniversary in the chapel of Santa Marta, he told them: "It is a beautiful day to ask oneself" if "one's Christian life has always opened the way to Jesus, if one's life has always been full of that gesture: pointing to Jesus". It is necessary, he continued, to 'give thanks' for all the times this has been done, but also to 'begin again'. Always begin again, with what the Pontiff called "youthful old age, or youth aged, like good wine!" and always take a "step forward to continue to be witnesses of Jesus". With the help of John "the great witness".

[Pope Francis, S. Marta homily, in L'Osservatore Romano 17/12/2016].

Christians are a priestly people for the world. Christians should make the living God visible to the world, they should bear witness to him and lead people towards him. When we speak of this task in which we share by virtue of our baptism, it is no reason to boast. It poses a question to us that makes us both joyful and anxious: are we truly God’s shrine in and for the world? Do we open up the pathway to God for others or do we rather conceal it? Have not we – the people of God – become to a large extent a people of unbelief and distance from God? Is it perhaps the case that the West, the heartlands of Christianity, are tired of their faith, bored by their history and culture, and no longer wish to know faith in Jesus Christ? We have reason to cry out at this time to God: “Do not allow us to become a ‘non-people’! Make us recognize you again! Truly, you have anointed us with your love, you have poured out your Holy Spirit upon us. Grant that the power of your Spirit may become newly effective in us, so that we may bear joyful witness to your message!

[Pope Benedict, Chrism homily 21 April 2011]

1. This admonition, dear brothers and sisters, is contained in the part of St Paul's Letter to the Romans that is proposed for common reflection this year on the occasion of the "Week of Prayer for Christian Unity".

The perspective in which the "Week" is set is that of a humanity united in praising the Lord, the creator of man and his redeemer: "Praise the Lord, all you peoples" (Ps 117:1; cf. Rom 15:5-13), recites the psalm quoted in St Paul's passage. A fundamental contribution to the implementation of such universal praise will certainly be offered by the rebuilding of the unity of Christ's disciples.

The movement, "born by the grace of the Holy Spirit" and "growing larger by the day" (Unitatis redintegratio, 1), which proposes the re-establishment of the full unity of Christians, is by its very nature very complex. It implies profound spiritual motivation, an attitude of religious obedience to the demands of the Gospel, persevering prayer, fraternal contact with other Christians to overcome, through dialogue of the truth and with respect for the integrity of the faith, existing differences, and finally cooperation in the various fields possible for a common witness.

This search for unity in faith and Christian witness finds in St Paul a realistic and admirably fruitful indication, as well as one that is always timely: mutual acceptance among Christians. The Apostle recommends: "Welcome one another as Christ welcomed you for the glory of God" (Rom 15:7).

The spirit of welcome is an essential and unifying dimension of the entire ecumenical movement; it is a vital expression of the need for communion. St Paul indicates some important elements of this welcome: it must be a welcome in faith in Jesus Christ, it must be reciprocal, and it must be for the glory of God.

2. As Christ welcomed you, St Paul exhorts, so you welcome one another, in sincere forgiveness and brotherly love. It is in faith in Christ that the Christian community gathers. It is in the context of the common baptism that mutual acceptance can count on the agglutinating power of grace, whose efficacy endures despite serious differences. The Second Vatican Council emphasises this when it states that those who "believe in Christ and have duly received baptism are constituted in a certain communion, albeit imperfect, with the Catholic Church" (Unitatis redintegratio, 3). They are therefore "justified in baptism by faith, are incorporated into Christ and are therefore given the name of Christians and by the children of the Catholic Church are rightly recognised as brothers in the Lord" (Unitatis redintegratio, 3).

3. Welcoming among Christians, to generate true communion, must also be reciprocal: "Welcome one another" (Rom 15:7). This presupposes mutual knowledge and readiness to appreciate and accept the authentically Christian values lived and developed by others. This is what the Second Vatican Council recalls: 'Catholics should joyfully recognise and esteem the truly Christian values, coming from the common heritage, found among our separated brethren. To recognise the riches of Christ and the virtuous works in the lives of others, who bear witness to Christ sometimes even to the shedding of blood, is a just and salutary thing: for God is always admirable and sublime in his works" (Unitatis redintegratio, 4). The Council goes even further by adding that "what is done by the grace of the Holy Spirit in separated brethren can contribute to our edification" (Unitatis redintegratio, 4). It is therefore our duty to appreciate what is authentically evangelical among other Christians. In fact, "everything that is truly Christian is never contrary to the benefits of faith; on the contrary, it can make the very mystery of Christ and the Church more perfectly attained" (Unitatis redintegratio, 4).

Hence the "golden rule" of ecumenism, the principle of respect for legitimate variety, as long as it is not detrimental to the integrity of the faith (cf. Unitatis redintegratio, 16-17). Some aspects of the revealed mystery in fact, as the Council notes with regard to the Eastern Churches, can sometimes be perceived more adequately by some than by others (cf. Unitatis redintegratio, 17). Openness to welcoming others with their Christian heritage thus proves to be the way to better draw from the superabundant wealth of God's grace.

4. The consequence of this is that, as St Paul says, everything is accomplished "for the glory of God" (Rom 15:7). In the Christian community, united in the name of Christ and guided by the word of the Gospel, God's action on behalf of humanity is reflected and his glory somehow shines forth. Jesus himself reveals this when, in the priestly prayer, addressed to the Father, for the unity of his disciples, he affirms: "The glory that you have given to me, I have given to them that they may be as we are one" (Jn 17:22).

Mutual acceptance for the glory of God is shown particularly in two moments: in the prayer that Christians raise together in praise of the common Lord, and in the concordant witness of charity, from which Christ's loving concern for the people of our time shines forth.

5. Considering the ecumenical situation today in the light of the demands of mutual acceptance, we must give glory to God for the new conditions of Christian brotherhood that have been consolidated. The slowly resumed and sometimes laboriously pursued contacts, the ever arduous and demanding theological dialogue, the events of pastoral collaboration and practical cooperation, have created a truly new situation among Christians. It has been clearly perceived that division is anti-evangelical, and efforts are being made together to re-establish unity in faithfulness.

The theological dialogue between Christians is reaching important goals in terms of clarifying each other's positions and achieving some convergence on issues that were bitterly disputed in the past. But the dialogue must continue in order to reach the goal: full agreement on the common profession of faith. In this regard, I would like to express my appreciation and gratitude to the Catholic theologians and theologians of other Churches and ecclesial communities who, within the framework of the various joint commissions, devote their attention and efforts to finding the way to overcome the divergences inherited from history, thus facilitating the Magisterium of the Church in fulfilling its duty in the service of revealed truth. Valuable work, therefore, that of theologians, which must be welcomed with gratitude and supported with prayer.

6. The theme of the present "Week of Prayer for Christian Unity" is set in the perspective of the universal doxology, which must rise from all peoples in praise of the one Lord.

Let each one feel committed to contribute to it in the ways that are possible for him. Persistent prayer will not fail to hasten the restoration of the full unity of all Christians in the one Church of Christ. Let us therefore also say with the Psalmist: "Praise the Lord, all you peoples, / All you nations, give him glory; / For strong is his love for us / And the faithfulness of the Lord endures for ever" (Ps 117:1-2). Amen.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 23 January 1991]

Pope Francis [...] returned to one of his mother ideas: the importance for the Christian, and not only, of reading a few lines of the Gospel every day. For a believer the gospel is not a book like any other but, since Jesus is the Incarnate Word of the Father, the collection of his words makes possible a particular efficacy of the action of the Holy Spirit within each one of us.

In reality, however, we often forget this and this happens because we do not know how to combine the words spoken two thousand years ago with our daily lives. The secret to making the gospel a daily presence is to discover that it is already in itself "a daily presence".

The Sunday on which the Pope asked us to return to giving importance to the Gospel was, for example, the Sunday on which the first half of the football championship ended: that is, the first half of a championship that is the first (and hopefully the last) without a public.

There were a lot of goals and surprising results and, according to the experts, this was largely due to the absence of a public: there are players, especially the younger ones,' said Fabio Capello, for example, 'who score more goals without a public, they perform better, because they have more courage.

It is, in a macroscopic way, the problem we all have: giving enormous importance to the judgement of others on us. We all feel the urge to be in the group because being in the group, in the social organisation, makes us feel protected, 'on the right side', we are not alone in facing life. But it is precisely this atmosphere of security that is often the chain that keeps us in prison, that prevents us from being ourselves and that drives us to betray our aspirations.

Each one of us, here is the lesson that comes to us from a championship such as this, has 'an audience' to which we are more or less consciously accountable: and the gospel could help us precisely to rid ourselves of this to a good extent. Jesus Christ, whether we believe he was God or not, was certainly a person who went against the expectations of his 'audience': whether they were the relatives, friends or the powerful of his time.

In a discussion, Christ tells the Pharisees that it is impossible for them to follow him, not because they do not know in their hearts that he is right, but because, by following him, they would have lost the consensus of their group. "How can you believe, you who take glory from one another, and do not seek the glory that comes from God alone?" (John 5:44).

We understand for ourselves that reading a sentence like this in the morning before going to the office or entering into an important relational dynamic would be infinitely liberating: and this regardless of whether one is a believer or a practitioner. That is why Bergoglio's words on the gospel have universal value.

[https://www.agi.it/blog-italia/idee/post/2021-01-28/campionato-senza-pubblico-papa-francesco-vangelo-11184640/]

Today, 25 March, we are in the heart of the Jubilee contemplating the mystery of the Annunciation and Incarnation of the Word. It used to be a predominantly Marian feast, as it still appears in many popular religious traditions. With the liturgical reform, it was highlighted as an important Christological solemnity that immerses us in the heart of the Incarnation of the eternal Word: God becoming man for our salvation. The presence of Mary - The Annunciation - as the one who with her 'yes' made the mystery of our salvation possible, the miracle of the Incarnation, always remains strong; and she invites each one of us to unite our 'yes' to hers, aware that only in humility is the human heart capable of responding to God's call.

IV Sunday in Lent (year C) [30 March 2025] 

*First Reading From the book of Joshua (5, 9a 10- 12)

Moses did not enter the promised land because he died on Mount Nebo, at the Dead Sea, on the side that today corresponds to the Jordanian shore. It was therefore not he who introduced the people of Israel into Palestine, but his servant and successor Joshua. The whole book of Joshua recounts the entry of the people into the promised land, starting with the crossing of the Jordan since the tribes of Israel entered Palestine from the east. The aim of the writer of this book is quite clear: if the author recalls God's work for Israel, it is to exhort the people to faithfulness. Within the few lines of today's text lies a real sermon that is divided into two teachings: firstly, we must never forget that God has delivered the people from Egypt; and secondly, if he has delivered them, it is to give them this land as he promised our fathers. We receive everything from God, but when we forget this, we put ourselves in dead-end situations. This is why the text draws continuous parallels between leaving Egypt, life in the desert and entering Canaan. For example, in chapter 3 of the book of Joshua, the crossing of the Jordan is solemnly recounted as a repetition of the Red Sea miracle. In this Sunday's text, the author insists on the Passover: "they celebrated the Passover, on the fourteenth day of the month, in the evening". Just as the celebration of the Passover had marked the exit from Egypt and the Red Sea miracle, the Passover now follows the entry into the promised land and the Jordan miracle. These are intentional parallels by which the author wants to say that, from the beginning to the end of this incredible adventure, it is the same God who acts to free his people, in view of the promised land. The book of Joshua comes immediately after Deuteronomy. "Joshua" is not his name, but the nickname given to him by Moses: at first, he was simply called "Hoshéa", "Hosea" meaning "He saves" and the new name, "Joshua" ("Yeoshoua") contains the name of God to indicate more explicitly that only God saves. Joshua after all understood that he alone cannot deliver his people. The second part of today's text is surprising because on the surface it speaks only of food, but there is much more: "On the day after the Passover, they ate the produce of that land: unleavened and toasted wheat. And from the next day, as they had eaten, the manna ceased. The Israelites had no more manna: that year they ate the fruits of the land of Canaan." This change of food suggests a weaning: a new page is turned, a new life begins and the desert period with its difficulties, recriminations and even miraculous solutions ends. Now Israel, having arrived in the God-given land, will no longer be nomads, but a sedentary people of farmers feeding on the products of the soil; an adult people responsible for its own subsistence. Having the means to provide for themselves, God does not replace them because he has great respect for their freedom. However, this people will not forget the manna and will retain the lesson: just as the Lord provided in the desert, so Israel must become solicitous towards those who for various reasons are in need. It is clearly stated in the Book of Deuteronomy: God has taught us to feed the poor by sending down bread from heaven for the children of Israel, and now it is up to us to do the same (cf. Deut.34:6). Finally, the crossing of the Jordan and the entry into the promised land, the land of freedom, helps us to better understand Jesus' baptism in the Jordan, which will become the sign of the new entry into the true land of freedom. 

*Responsorial Psalm (33 (34) 2-3, 4-5, 6-7)

In this psalm, as in others, each verse is constructed in two lines in dialogue and ideally it should be sung in two alternating choruses, line by line. It is composed of 22 verses corresponding to the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet, in poetry called an acrostic: each letter of the alphabet is placed vertically in front of each verse, beginning with the corresponding letter in the margin. This procedure, quite frequent in psalms, indicates that we are dealing with a psalm of thanksgiving for the covenant. We could say that it is a response to the first reading from the book of Joshua, where although it tells a story, there is actually an invitation to give thanks for all that God has accomplished for Israel.  The language of thanksgiving is omnipresent, as is evident in the first verses: 'I will bless the Lord at all times ... on my lips always his praise ... magnify the Lord with me ... let us exalt his name together'. The speaker is Israel, witness to the work of God: a God who responds, frees, listens, saves: "I sought the Lord: he answered me; from all fear he delivered me... this poor man cries out and the Lord listens to him: he saves him from all his anguish."  This attention of God emerges in the passage from chapter 3 of Exodus, which was the first reading of last Sunday, the third of Lent i.e. the episode of the burning bush: "I have seen the misery of my people... their cry has reached me... I know their sufferings." Israel is the poor liberated by God's mercy, as we read in this psalm, and has discovered its twofold mission: firstly, to teach all the humble about faith, understood as a dialogue between God and man who cries out his distress and God hears him, liberates him and comes to his aid; secondly, to be willing to collaborate with God's work. Just as Moses and Joshua were God's instruments to deliver his people and bring them into the promised land, so Israel will be the attentive ear to the poor and the instrument of God's concern for them: 'let the poor hear and rejoice'. Israel must echo down the centuries this cry, which is an interwoven polyphony of suffering, praise and hope to alleviate all forms of poverty. It is necessary, however, to be poor in heart with the realism of recognising ourselves as small and to invoke God for help in the certainty that he accompanies us in every circumstance to help us face life's obstacles. 

*Second Reading from the Second Epistle of St Paul to the Corinthians (5:17-21)

This text can be understood in two ways and everything revolves around the central phrase: "not imputing (God) to men their faults" (v.19) which can have two meanings. The first: since the beginning of the world, God has kept count of men's sins, but, in his great mercy, he agreed to wipe them out through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ and this is what is known as 'substitution', i.e. Jesus took on in our place a debt too great for us. Secondly, God has never counted the sins of men, and Christ came into the world to show us that God has always been love and forgiveness, as we read in Psalm 102 (103): "God turns away our sins from us". The whole path of biblical revelation moves us from the first hypothesis to the second, and in order to understand it better, we need to answer these three questions: Does God keep count of our sins? Can we speak of 'substitution' in the death of Christ? If God does not reckon with us and if we cannot speak of 'substitution', how should we interpret this text of Paul?

First: Does God keep count of our sins? At the beginning of the covenant history, Israel was certainly convinced of this and it is clear why. Man cannot discover God unless God himself reveals himself to him. To Abraham God does not speak of sin, but of covenant, of promise, of blessing, of descent, and never does the word 'merit' appear. "Abraham had faith in the Lord and it was credited to him as righteousness" (Gen 15:6), so faith is the only thing that counts. God does not keep track of our actions, which does not mean that we can do anything, because we are responsible for building the Kingdom. To Moses, the Lord reveals himself as merciful and forgiving, slow to anger and rich in love (cf. Ex 34:6). David, precisely on the occasion of his sin, understands that God's forgiveness precedes even our repentance and Isaiah observes that God surprises us because His thoughts are not our thoughts: He is only forgiveness for sinners (cf. Is 55:6-8). In the Old Testament, the chosen people already knew that God is tenderness and forgiveness and called him Father long before we did. The parable of Jonah, for example, was written precisely to show that God cares even for the Ninevites, Israel's historical enemies.

Second: Can one speak of 'substitution' in the death of Christ? If God does not keep count of sins and therefore we do not have a debt to pay, there is no need for Jesus to replace us. Moreover, the New Testament texts speak of solidarity, never substitution, and Jesus does not act in our place, nor is he our representative. He is the 'firstborn' as Paul says, who opens the way and walks before us. Mixed in with sinners he asked for Baptism from John and on the cross he accepted to give his life for us. He drew near to us so that we could draw near to Him.

Thirdly: How then is this text of Paul's to be interpreted? First of all, God has never kept count of the sins of men, and Christ came into the world to make us understand this. When he says to Pilate: "I have come into the world to bear witness to the truth" (Jn 18:37), he affirms that his mission is to reveal the face of God who is always love and forgiveness. And when Paul writes: "...not imputing (God) to men their faults" he means to make it clear that God erases our false ideas about Him, those that portray Him as an accountant.  Jesus came to show the face of God Love, but was rejected and therefore accepted to die. He had become too inconvenient for the religious authorities of the time, who thought they knew better than he did who God was, and so he died on the cross because of human pride that had turned into implacable hatred. To Philip in the Upper Room he said: "He who has seen me has seen the Father" (Jn 14:9) and even in the midst of humiliation and hatred he only uttered words of forgiveness. We understand at this point the sentence with which this passage closes: "He who knew no sin, God made him sin for our sake, that in him we might become the righteousness of God" (v. 21). On the face of Christ crucified, we contemplate to what extent the horror of our sin reaches us, but also to what extent God's forgiveness reaches us, and from this contemplation our conversion can be born: "They shall look upon him whom they have pierced", a text from the prophet Zechariah (12:10), which we find in the Fourth Gospel (Jn 19:37). Hence our vocation as ambassadors of God's love: "We beseech you in the name of Christ: be reconciled to God" (v.20).

*From the Gospel according to Luke (15:1-3. 11-32)

The interpretive key to this text is found in the very first words. St Luke writes that "all publicans and sinners came to Jesus to listen to him" while "the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, 'He welcomes sinners and eats with them'. The former are public sinners to be avoided, while the latter are honest people who seek to do what pleases God. In truth, the Pharisees were generally upright, pious people and faithful to the Law of Moses, shocked however by the behaviour of Jesus who does not seem to understand who he is dealing with if he even eats and mingles with sinners. God is the Holy One and for them there was a total incompatibility between God and sinners and therefore Jesus, if he was truly from God, had to avoid associating with them. This parable is intended to help one discover the true face of God who is Father. In fact, the main character in this story is God himself, the father who has two kinds of sons, both with at least one point in common, namely the way they conceive of their relationship with their father in terms of merits and accounts, even though they behave differently: the younger offends him gravely, unlike the elder, and in the end, however, acknowledges his sin: "I am no longer worthy to be called your son"; the elder, on the other hand, boasts of having always obeyed but complains that he has never even received a kid as he deserves. The Father is out of these calculations and does not want to hear about merits because he loves his children and in this relationship there is no room for calculating accounts. To the prodigal son, who had demanded 'my share of the inheritance that is due to me', he had gone far beyond the demand, as he will eventually say to both of them: all that is mine is yours. To the prodigal son who returns he does not even leave time to express any repentance, he does not demand an explanation; on the contrary, he wants to celebrate immediately, because 'this son of mine was dead and has come back to life; he was lost and has been found'. The lesson is clear: with God it is not a matter of calculations, merits, even if we struggle to eradicate this mentality, and the whole Bible, from the Old Testament onwards, shows the slow and patient pedagogy with which God seeks to make himself known as Father, ready to celebrate every time we return to him.

Two small comments to conclude:

1. In the first reading, taken from the book of Joshua, Israel is nourished by manna during the desert crossing, while here there is no manna for the son who refuses to live with his father and finds himself in an existential desert, because he has cut himself off. 

2. Concerning the connection with the parable of the lost sheep, which is also found in this chapter of Luke, it is observed that the shepherd goes to look for the lost sheep and brings it back by putting it on his shoulders, while the father does not prevent the son from leaving and does not force him to return because he respects his freedom to the full.

+Giovanni D'Ercole

(Jn 5:17-30)

The center of Jewish hope was the return to ancient times, which however moved into an indeterminate future ["last day"].

According to the Master, life as saved persons begins now, and from listening to his specific Word-Person (v.24) which supplants every code.

He attributes to himself a total (also juridical) caliber. It replaces the area once believed to be the prerogative of God alone: ​​«He gave all judgment to the Son» (v.22).

Faced with the resounding of the present Logos and the Father's incisive and life-giving Dream which becomes actual, death loses all destructive efficacy.

The aspect of human and operative reality prevails over what to religions seemed to be reserved for the God of Heaven alone, and projected into a perfect future.

The Memorial is now. To redo the triumph - through Golgotha, here.

Impossible to confuse the scope of incessant life with observances.

Difficult to call God with the term Father [Abba, papa] if He transmitted to us the desire to be and to do, only with detachment.

The healing of the paralytic (vv.1-16) has in fact existential traits that pass in divine character. It is not comparable to the results of a doctor's activity, but to the work of the Spirit in us.

The time of man's diminution before the Most High is over: his plan is not for anguish, but for growth - which authentically manifests the Judgment of the Eternal.

Judgment: not of custody of order, but of love and regeneration. Human imprint in transmitting the divine condition (v.18) in fullness of being and freedom, in the intimate experience of his Heart.

Jesus expresses immanence with the Father by expanding his creative work, which is by no means finished: it continues to vivify us.

God supports the universe and our being, so He’s always active. Here and now; not on the other side of time - therefore He doesn’t incline to the quiet drowsiness of conscience.

The Father always works, the Son - his first and incessant imprint - imitates his quality of action in continuity.

It’s a concrete Pact for the people: His Council all to be implemented, really comes to us.

To this end, He’s not afraid to transgress an approximate and narrow precept, an idol of the sacred, albeit very devout, ancient tradition.

Moreover, even in the sabbath rest [!] the Creator blesses and consecrates (Genesis 2,3).

The whole multiple history is in a sort of unity’s principle: time of intervention for salvation and relationship with the Mystery.

Wherever we proceed, those who reflect God do not stun of prejudices on human reality: instead they are already there and remain indefinitely.

Sons in the «Son of man» (v.27) - to dialogue, open, support, give refreshment, make every situation intense and delicate.

Honoring the Most High is honoring humanity in need of everything, at any time.

Only this ‘manifests’ Him, even in ‘infractions’ - a land rich in new springs that shorten distances.

This is the reciprocal and singular Work of God (Jn 6:29): to love, not «works» (v.28) heavy with law and nomenclature.

[Wednesday 4th wk. in Lent, April 2nd, 2025]

(Jn 5:17-30)

The centre of the Jewish hope was the return to ancient times, which, however, was transferred to an indeterminate future ["last day"].

According to the Master, life as saved begins now, and from listening to his specific Word-Person (v.24) that supersedes every code.

He ascribes to himself a total (even legal) character. It replaces the sphere once believed to be the prerogative of God alone: "He has given all judgment to the Son" (v.22).

Faced with the resounding of the present Logos and the efficacious and life-giving Dream of the Father, death loses all destructive efficacy.

The aspect of human and operative reality prevails over what to religions seemed to be reserved for the God of Heaven alone, and projected into a perfect future.

The Memorial is now. To remake the triumph - through Golgotha, here.

Says the Tao Tê Ching (xxi): "From ancient times until now, his Name does not pass away, and so he consents to all beginnings. From what do I know the manner of all beginnings? From this'.

Jesus expresses the intimate immanence with the Father by expanding his creative work, which is by no means finished: he continues to enliven us. He sustains the universe and our being, so he is always active.

It is impossible to confuse the scope of unceasing life with observances.

It would be difficult to call God by the term Father [Abba, papa] if He conveyed to us a desire to be and to do, only with detachment.

In fact, the healing of the paralytic (vv.1-16) has existential traits that pass in divine character; it is not comparable to the results of a doctor's activity, but to the work of the Spirit in us.

The time of man's diminishment before the Most High is over: his design is not for distress, but for growth - which authentically manifests the Judgement of the Eternal.

A judgement not of the preservation of order, but of love and regeneration: a human imprint in transmitting to us the divine condition [(v.18); cf. commentary on Jn 10:31-42: You make yourself God, you are Gods] in fullness of being and freedom, in the intimate experience of his Heart.

Here and now; not on the other side of time - so there is no inclination to the quiet slumber of conscience.

Indulgent yes, but because of the falls in the risk - of witnessing at least a crumb of his image within, without the lowest denominator.

In the encounter with the Person of Jesus, we become aware of his resurrection power: devoid of partiality, consistent and objective on the terrain of both life and death, remission, and judgement.

Unceasingly we assimilate his thoughts, impulses, words, actions, charged events: everything becomes a young experience of God revealing himself.

The Father always works, the Son - his first and unceasing imprint - imitates his quality of action in continuity.

It is a concrete covenant for the people: his all-embracing Council truly comes to us.

To this end, he is not afraid to transgress an approximate and narrow precept, an idol of the sacred, albeit devout, ancient tradition.

After all, even in the Sabbath rest the Creator blesses and consecrates (Gen 2:3).

Father and Son are not custodians of tranquillitas ordinis, nor do they induce a drowsiness of conscience.

The whole of manifold history is in a kind of unity principle: time of intervention for salvation, and relationship to the Mystery.

Wherever we proceed, he who reflects God does not stun with prejudices about human reality: instead, he is already there and remains to the bitter end.

Sons in the "Son of Man" (v.27) - to dialogue, to open, to support, to give refreshment, to make every situation intense and delicate.

To honour the Most High is to honour humanity in need of everything, at all times.

Only this manifests him, even in the infractions - a land rich in new springs that shorten distances.

This is the reciprocal and singular Work of God (Jn 6:29): to love, not "works" (v.28) burdensome with law and nomenclature.

To internalise and live the message:

How to be the face of the Father, creator of life, friend and brother, who raises up?

How to recognise the new Covenant and correspond to it? What does it mean for you to believe in the victory of life over death?

You make yourself God

(Jn 10:31-42)

In Jn the term Jews indicates not the people, but the spiritual leaders. A blasphemous Jesus claims mutual immanence with the Father, and dares to expand to us the boundaries of the Mystery that envelops and fills him.

But the divine condition manifested in its human fullness is rejected by the religious leaders precisely in the name of adherence to the Eternal.

The authorities reject the Son in the name of the Eternal and fidelity to the traditional idea, to the irreducible image of the victorious God (from which springs a certain type of competitive society, ruthless even in spiritual life).

According to Jesus, the Father is not revealed by reasoning and cerebral arguments, but by the indestructible quality of 'beautiful' works (vv.32-33). 

The Greek term stands for the sense of fullness and wonder - truth, goodness, fascination, amazement - that emanates from the one action required in any work (major or minor): the love that resurrects the needy.

And Scripture recognises in each of us this sacred spark, which gives all happenings and emotions the step of Vertigo that surpasses the things around us, or how they 'should' be done.

Of course, to support us we need a Face, a relationship and a close kinship to identify what moves us, to peer inside what appears or is aroused.

The Unity of natures - He in us and we with the Father - corresponds to us in the Face of Christ, and is made manifest in listening, welcoming, not rushing to condemn, but making the weak strong.

The symbiosis with God in our activities, with our way of proposing or reacting, throughout our lives, unfolds in each Son His Likeness, even in difficult circumstances.

Everything that happens, even persecutions and assassination attempts due to misunderstanding or spiritual envy, can be looked at from a different perspective.

They are events, external happenings that activate overall energies: they become cosmic outside and acutely divine within us.

Rather than dangers and annoyances, they trace an Exodus destiny - like a river that carries, but in Christ escapes us from the hands of a deadly stasis (v.39), and admirably resonates with the forces that lead to the peripheries - where we must go.

From Son of David to Son of Man

The Church is Catholic because Christ embraces the whole of humanity in his mission of salvation. While Jesus' mission in his earthly life was limited to the Jewish people, "to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Mt 15:24), it was nevertheless oriented from the beginning to bring the light of the Gospel to all peoples and to bring all nations into the Kingdom of God. Confronted with the faith of the Centurion in Capernaum, Jesus exclaims: "Now I tell you that many will come from the east and the west and sit down at table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven" (Mt 8:11). This universalistic perspective emerges, among other things, from the presentation Jesus made of himself not only as "Son of David", but as "son of man" (Mk 10:33), as we also heard in the Gospel passage just proclaimed. The title "Son of Man", in the language of the Jewish apocalyptic literature inspired by the vision of history in the Book of the Prophet Daniel (cf. 7:13-14), recalls the person who comes "with the clouds of heaven" (v. 13) and is an image that heralds an entirely new kingdom, a kingdom supported not by human powers, but by the true power that comes from God. Jesus uses this rich and complex expression and refers it to Himself to manifest the true character of His messianism, as a mission destined for the whole man and every man, overcoming all ethnic, national and religious particularism. And it is precisely in following Jesus, in allowing oneself to be drawn into his humanity and thus into communion with God, that one enters into this new kingdom, which the Church announces and anticipates, and which overcomes fragmentation and dispersion.

[Pope Benedict, address to the Consistory 24 November 2012].

44. To protest against God in the name of justice is not helpful. A world without God is a world without hope (cf. Eph 2:12). Only God can create justice. And faith gives us the certainty that he does so. The image of the Last Judgement is not primarily an image of terror, but an image of hope; for us it may even be the decisive image of hope. Is it not also a frightening image? I would say: it is an image that evokes responsibility, an image, therefore, of that fear of which Saint Hilary spoke when he said that all our fear has its place in love. God is justice and creates justice. This is our consolation and our hope. And in his justice there is also grace. This we know by turning our gaze to the crucified and risen Christ. Both these things—justice and grace—must be seen in their correct inner relationship. Grace does not cancel out justice. It does not make wrong into right. It is not a sponge which wipes everything away, so that whatever someone has done on earth ends up being of equal value. Dostoevsky, for example, was right to protest against this kind of Heaven and this kind of grace in his novel The Brothers Karamazov. Evildoers, in the end, do not sit at table at the eternal banquet beside their victims without distinction, as though nothing had happened. Here I would like to quote a passage from Plato which expresses a premonition of just judgement that in many respects remains true and salutary for Christians too. Albeit using mythological images, he expresses the truth with an unambiguous clarity, saying that in the end souls will stand naked before the judge. It no longer matters what they once were in history, but only what they are in truth: “Often, when it is the king or some other monarch or potentate that he (the judge) has to deal with, he finds that there is no soundness in the soul whatever; he finds it scourged and scarred by the various acts of perjury and wrong-doing ...; it is twisted and warped by lies and vanity, and nothing is straight because truth has had no part in its development. Power, luxury, pride, and debauchery have left it so full of disproportion and ugliness that when he has inspected it (he) sends it straight to prison, where on its arrival it will undergo the appropriate punishment ... Sometimes, though, the eye of the judge lights on a different soul which has lived in purity and truth ... then he is struck with admiration and sends him to the isles of the blessed”. In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (cf. Lk 16:19-31), Jesus admonishes us through the image of a soul destroyed by arrogance and opulence, who has created an impassable chasm between himself and the poor man; the chasm of being trapped within material pleasures; the chasm of forgetting the other, of incapacity to love, which then becomes a burning and unquenchable thirst. We must note that in this parable Jesus is not referring to the final destiny after the Last Judgement, but is taking up a notion found, inter alia, in early Judaism, namely that of an intermediate state between death and resurrection, a state in which the final sentence is yet to be pronounced.

47. Some recent theologians are of the opinion that the fire which both burns and saves is Christ himself, the Judge and Saviour. The encounter with him is the decisive act of judgement. Before his gaze all falsehood melts away. This encounter with him, as it burns us, transforms and frees us, allowing us to become truly ourselves. All that we build during our lives can prove to be mere straw, pure bluster, and it collapses. Yet in the pain of this encounter, when the impurity and sickness of our lives become evident to us, there lies salvation. His gaze, the touch of his heart heals us through an undeniably painful transformation “as through fire”. But it is a blessed pain, in which the holy power of his love sears through us like a flame, enabling us to become totally ourselves and thus totally of God. In this way the inter-relation between justice and grace also becomes clear: the way we live our lives is not immaterial, but our defilement does not stain us for ever if we have at least continued to reach out towards Christ, towards truth and towards love. Indeed, it has already been burned away through Christ's Passion. At the moment of judgement we experience and we absorb the overwhelming power of his love over all the evil in the world and in ourselves. The pain of love becomes our salvation and our joy. It is clear that we cannot calculate the “duration” of this transforming burning in terms of the chronological measurements of this world. The transforming “moment” of this encounter eludes earthly time-reckoning—it is the heart's time, it is the time of “passage” to communion with God in the Body of Christ. The judgement of God is hope, both because it is justice and because it is grace. If it were merely grace, making all earthly things cease to matter, God would still owe us an answer to the question about justice—the crucial question that we ask of history and of God. If it were merely justice, in the end it could bring only fear to us all. The incarnation of God in Christ has so closely linked the two together—judgement and grace—that justice is firmly established: we all work out our salvation “with fear and trembling” (Phil 2:12). Nevertheless grace allows us all to hope, and to go trustfully to meet the Judge whom we know as our “advocate”, or parakletos (cf. 1 Jn 2:1).

[Spe salvi]