Argentino Quintavalle è studioso biblico ed esperto in Protestantesimo e Giudaismo. Autore del libro “Apocalisse - commento esegetico” (disponibile su Amazon) e specializzato in catechesi per protestanti che desiderano tornare nella Chiesa Cattolica.
(Jn 8:1-11)
John 8:1 Jesus then set out for the Mount of Olives.
John 8:2 But at dawn he went into the temple again, and all the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them.
John 8:3 Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to him a woman caught in adultery, and placed her in the midst,
John 8:4 they say to him, "Teacher, this woman has been caught in flagrante adultery.
John 8:5 Now Moses, in the Law, commanded us to stone women like this one. What sayest thou?"
John 8:6 This they said to test him and to have something to accuse him of. But Jesus stooped down and began to write with his finger on the ground.
John 8:7 And when they persisted in questioning him, he lifted up his head and said to them, "Whoever of you is without sin, let him cast the stone at her first.
John 8:8 And bowing down again, he wrote on the ground.
John 8:9 But when they heard this, they went away one by one, beginning from the eldest to the last.
Only Jesus remained with the woman there in the midst.
John 8:10 Then rising up, Jesus said to her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"
John 8:11 And she answered, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said to her, "Neither do I condemn you; go, and henceforth sin no more."
Significant is the verb that John uses to indicate that Jesus goes to the temple: "paraginomai". The verb is composed of the preposition "para", meaning "near, towards" and the verb "gignomai", meaning "to become". Jesus' going to the temple therefore is a becoming near and becoming more and more that temple which is not only the house of his Father, but also the figure of his new body, in which a new worship pleasing to God will be celebrated.
The context in which the story is set is that of the temple and more precisely, as v. 20 emphasises with extreme precision, the "place of treasure" which was also called the women's courtyard, because it marked the boundary beyond which women could not enter. So when the scribes and Pharisees lead the woman caught in the act of adultery by Jesus, he was teaching in the women's hall or treasury. The story of the adulteress therefore fits within the teaching activity of Jesus, and in some way is part of it.
The scribes and Pharisees lead a woman to Jesus. She is placed in the middle. It is not said exactly where, but the idea is that she is placed between the two sides, between Jesus and the religious authorities. So we find ourselves between two opposing sides in the middle of which the object of contention is placed, not so much the woman, stripped of all identity and dignity, but what she represents: a case of Torah violation. The issue therefore immediately shifts from the woman to the Mosaic Law, which condemns her to stoning. A comparison that becomes more evident in v. 5 where Moses is opposed to Jesus: 'Moses commanded us... What sayest thou?
"This they said to test him and to have something to accuse him of". On trial, therefore, is not only the woman, but with her also Jesus, who is faced with an aut aut aut: to go against Moses, upholding his critical position towards the way of understanding the Torah; or to agree with Moses, denying his position. But Jesus finds a third way: twice, in v. 6 and v. 8, it is pointed out that Jesus "began to write with his finger on the ground". John, therefore, seems to want to draw attention to Jesus' bizarre behaviour. People have wondered what Jesus was writing on the ground with his finger, and rivers of ink have been spilled in the most disparate hypotheses, which, when all is said and done, have remained so. But here the problem is not the content, that is, what Jesus was writing, but Jesus' writing itself; it is this gesture that the evangelist points out to his reader and not what Jesus wrote: "stooping down, he began to write with his finger on the ground". Moreover, it should not be forgotten, Jesus was writing on the floor of the women's hall, which was made of stone. What he wrote with his finger therefore could not remain imprinted and therefore could not even be read.
In order to understand Jesus' behaviour, it is necessary to read carefully: "bowed down"; it is the attitude of one who approaches from the top down, almost as if to meet something or someone, who is lower than oneself. At this point Jesus "began to write with his finger on the ground". Here is what counts: "writing with his finger" on the earth, which we know, however, to be "stone". Jesus therefore bent down and wrote with his finger on the stone. To reinforce this concept there is the same verb to write which, unlike the one in v. 8, is here rendered with a particular verbal form: "katégraphen", whose primary meaning is not to write, but to engrave, to scratch, emphasising more the action of a stonemason than that of a scribe. And this is exactly what Ex 31:18 says: "When the Lord had finished speaking to Moses on Mount Sinai, he gave him the two tablets of the testimony, TABLES OF STONE, WRITTEN BY GOD'S FINGER". God too therefore went down to Mount Sinai and there with his finger wrote his Law on stone. Jesus' behaviour therefore exactly reproduces that of God at Sinai. Jesus is therefore here rewriting the Mosaic Law with the very authority of God, reproducing its behaviour, thus declaring outdated not so much the Torah, but the way of approaching it and understanding it, according to the logic of the letter, stifling the spirit it carried.
Judaism could not transcend the physicality of the Law expressed in the letter. In fact, his adversaries "persisted in questioning him" (v. 7). Thus, Jesus challenges them, turning the accusation levelled at the adulteress against them: 'Let him who is without sin among you cast the stone at her first'. To their insistence Jesus, therefore, responds by inviting them to reflect on their common condition as sinners, since no one before God can in any way consider himself righteous and holy. The Torah must therefore be reread and recomposed from God's perspective and not man's; this is why Jesus is rewriting the Torah according to God's logic and feeling and has all the authority and power to do so.
V. 9 notes how they all went away, thus denouncing their inability to judge, because one sinner cannot stand as judge towards another sinner. Judaism with its world of the letter that accuses and condemns has disappeared, making way for a new reality, that of the Father's love that has given itself to man in the Son so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. God in Jesus is therefore rewriting his Law according to the logic no longer of the letter, but of the spirit that vivifies it. The judgement therefore is to be carried out in forgiveness and mercy.
The account of the adulteress closes with a statement: no verdict has been passed; no judgement has been accomplished. The trial that had been established against Jesus and the woman has dissolved, for this is the time of mercy and salvation and not of judgement. The Mosaic Law loses its harsh face as a judge that condemns without appeal to flow into the economy of love and grace. That is why the representatives and supporters of the Law have disappeared and only Jesus remains, the new Moses who is rewriting with the finger of God a new law, one founded on the spirit that gives life and does not take it away.
V.11 closes with the exhortation to resume and continue that journey of regeneration that began with the encounter with Jesus expressed with that "from now on" that marks a clear break between the before and the after; a new journey begins: "from now on sin no more". In our normal understanding, not sinning means not committing sins, that is, not committing violations, whereby sinning is a doing or not doing what the divine Law commands us to do. But the expression in question goes far beyond this reductive view. In fact, the verb 'amartánō' (to sin) in the first instance does not mean to sin, but to deviate, to take a wrong turn, to stray from the truth, to fall short of the goal, to fail; hence, in the second instance, also to sin, the meaning of which, however, must be understood within those meanings from which it derives. Consequently, Jesus' invitation "not to sin" is not an invitation not to violate the Mosaic Law any more, but rather to take note of how the woman, from her encounter with Jesus, has been generated to a new life ("from now on") and in this newness of life must beware of deviating and abandoning her, not so much because someone might condemn her again, but because "from now on" abandoning her already contains in itself the sense of failing that ultimate goal towards which one has set out: God, in whose life we have already been made partakers in Christ.
At this point no one, neither the Law nor God, will condemn us any longer, because we would condemn ourselves and God can no longer do anything, because, paraphrasing St Augustine, that God who created us without us, cannot save us without us. In other words, salvation is now a gift that has been placed in our hands; it is up to us to adhere to it existentially or not. And here it is not a matter of observing some commandment or not, a banal as well as deceptive way of feeling right with God, but of keeping our existential orientation towards Him, which only the Word can nourish and sustain, preventing us from sinning, that is, from failing our first and last objective: God! And this goes far beyond the observance or non-observance of some precept.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
The Church and Israel according to St Paul - Romans 9-11
(Buyable on Amazon)
(2Cor 5,17-21)
4th Sunday in Lent (year C)
2Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; old things have passed away, behold new things have come into being.
2Corinthians 5:18 But all this comes from God, who has reconciled us to himself through Christ, and has entrusted to us the ministry of reconciliation.
2Corinthians 5:19 For it was God who reconciled the world to himself in Christ, not imputing their trespasses to men, and entrusting to us the word of reconciliation.
2 Corinthians 5:20 We therefore act as ambassadors for Christ, as if God were exhorting through us. We beseech you in the name of Christ: be reconciled to God.
2 Corinthians 5:21 He who knew no sin, God dealt with him as sin on our behalf, that we might become through him the righteousness of God.
"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature; old things are passed away, behold new things are born." Paul gives an essay of his view according to faith. Literally from the Greek it is: 'If one in Christ a new creation', without a verb. He does not say: 'If one believes in Christ...', but says 'If one in Christ'; he does not use the verb to be. If one is placed in Christ, that is, if there is this identification with Christ, then one is another reality, a new creature. What has come into being with Christ's resurrection is a new reality.
Faith makes us one with Christ, because it makes us one body in Christ. Christ is the newness of God. Christ is the new man who came to make all things new. If we are in Christ, we share in his newness of love and truth. What is the consequence of this newness? The abandonment of old things. Old, for Paul, is all the past lived without Christ or in expectation of him.
Another consequence is this: the old things in Christ no longer exist; if we make them exist, then we are no longer vitally united to Christ; we are in Christ by reason of our baptism, but we are not in Christ as a participation in his grace and truth.
This is another great principle of Pauline anthropology, which is then Christian anthropology. Having become new creatures in Christ obliges us to live as such. It obliges us to live in newness of life, and the newness of life for Paul is only one: to reproduce the life of Christ in our members, because we are his body.
The Church not only has the obligation to proclaim Christ, it also has the obligation to help each member of Christ to develop all the newness that Christ has created in him through his holy Spirit. The Church must be a teacher and guide so that each of her children manifests Christ in deeds and thoughts. That is why, in addition to being missionary, she must also be the formator of those who already believe in Christ. Without this work of formation, the mission itself vanishes. The Christian mission cannot be carried out except by those who live of Christ, in Christ and for Christ. It is the Church's task to commit all her energy so that God's people may grow in truth, grace, holiness and spirituality.
The Church will not be able to do this if it loses sight of being light in the midst of men. A light that fades is no longer seen by anyone; whereas a light that grows and grows ever larger can attract men from far and wide. This is the way of the Church: the spiritual, doctrinal, sapiential formation of her children.
"All this, however, comes from God, who has reconciled us to himself through Christ and has entrusted to us the ministry of reconciliation". Here we come to the great theme of reconciliation. Why is Paul writing this letter? To reconcile with the Corinthians. So he arrives at the summit by emphasising the love of Christ who gave himself; this is the cause that reconciles, that brings back together. Reconciliation is through Christ, but on this the disagreements begin, or rather the falsehoods begin. Everyone affirms redemption through Christ, but not redemption at the creation in us of the newness that is Christ. One cannot affirm that man has been made a new creature in Christ without affirming that he is called to live this new life.
A redemption conceived only as final salvation, without the newness that Christ has produced in us, is a Protestant redemption, it is not biblical redemption, it is not Catholic redemption, because this is not the redemption that Jesus Christ came to work in our midst.
"For it was God who reconciled the world to himself in Christ". Paul now explains what reconciliation consists in. By sin, man has contracted a guilt before Him. This guilt deserves a penalty, which is man's eternal death. God, by Christ's sacrifice offered on the cross, by His obedience unto death and death on a cross, no longer imputes this guilt. So the important action was done by Christ and he entrusted the apostles with the ministry of reconciliation. There is a quarrel, between God and man; it is evident that God is right and man is wrong. At this point, to achieve reconciliation, what is to be done? In the world he who is wrong pays! There is the penalty and there are the costs of the trial: the one who is wrong pays; after that one gets right and is reconciled. Here, on the other hand, reconciliation takes place by not making the wrongdoer pay, and this announcement of reconciliation without payment of the penalty and costs is entrusted to the apostles.
It should be pointed out that Christian reconciliation is not only the non-charging of the sins committed. This is only one part of reconciliation. Christian reconciliation on the one hand confesses the forgiveness of sins, on the other hand it is incorporation into Christ, it is being made new creatures in Christ. All these aspects of reconciliation are essential and must be taught, otherwise reconciliation can also be reduced to a purely legal fact. The Lord does not impute sin to us, but we remain as we are. This is not the Christian truth of reconciliation, but is Calvinist doctrine.
"We therefore act as ambassadors for Christ, as if God were exhorting through us. We beseech you in the name of Christ: be reconciled to God." The teaching now turns into a heartfelt invitation to accept God's gift. It is not enough that God has reconciled the world in Christ: it is urgent that each one of us allow ourselves to be reconciled in Christ by God, and allow ourselves to be reconciled by accepting the word of the gospel, the truth of Christ, into our hearts. Letting oneself be reconciled with God, inviting every man to welcome the word of salvation, is the ever new invitation that the Church must make to every man. This is the way of salvation. Others do not exist.
The missionary action of the Church begins with a strong invitation to conversion. The invitation to conversion, to reconciliation must be explicit, clear, evident. It cannot be assumed, nor made by half sentences or allusions. This is not the method of Jesus Christ, it is not the style of Paul, it is not the way of the saints.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(1Cor 10,1-6.10-12)
3rd Sunday in Lent (year C)
1Corinthians 10:1 For I do not want you to be ignorant, O brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, all crossed the sea,
1Corinthians 10:2 all were baptized in relation to Moses in the cloud and in the sea,
Paul, in this passage, refers us to the history of the past, to the lesson of history. He reminds us of the deeper meaning of history, which is the history of salvation. It is said that history is a teacher of life, but the pupils learn nothing. Paul instead says that from the history of Israel one must learn. The history of Israel is not just any history, but it is a way in which divine revelation was historically manifested. Revelation, in fact, was not manifested through the explanation of concepts, but through certain historical facts that are then also read and interpreted. The history of Israel is an exemplary history, so it is right and proper, if one wants to understand Jesus Christ, to see all the sacred history that prepares him. Among other things, this also accustoms us to reading our own little personal history, which is also salvation history because the Lord walks with us.
"For I do not want you to be ignorant": The Corinthians were supposed to know the facts narrated here, but the apostle wants them to know the typological significance that these facts have, and which is not to be ignored. Jesus Christ is the end result of a long journey, and we must know the journey that preceded it. Paul is very respectful of Israel's history and feels he must tell it. He refers us to these examples from the past that are extraordinary events, but they are also events of sin, and yet always instructive because they show what God's way is.
"Our fathers". Christians can consider the ancient Israelites as their fathers, because the Church succeeded the synagogue, and they are the true heirs and children of Abraham.
"They were all": Three times Paul repeats this expression. As if to say that salvation had been given to all. For all were led by the cloud, that is, by the presence of God, and all crossed the sea. All gained freedom from slavery and all were guided by God on the way to the promised land. Hence, on God's part, no exclusion, no preference towards some at the expense of others. He brought all his people out of Egypt, for all he parted the sea, for all he willed the cloud. All were in the condition of grace and truth that would enable them to conquer the promised land and possess it forever.
This universality of grace and truth for Paul is akin to a baptism. There is an immersion also of the children of Israel, even though their baptism is merely a figure of that instituted by Jesus Christ. However, there is a true immersion of the Israelites in the sea and in the 'cloud' and this immersion for them is true salvation, true deliverance.
Israel lived under the cloud, that mysterious cloud that guided the Israelites through the desert and sheltered them from the sun: signifying the presence of God, the Shekinah. To be under the cloud is to be under God's protection. They crossed the sea and were baptised: the passage from the land of slavery, which is Egypt, to the promised land, takes place through the crossing of the Red Sea, and this is a baptism because it signifies the detachment from the slavery of Egypt, liberation and purification, and the journey to the promised land.
"To be of Moses". Moses, the mediator of the old covenant, was a figure of Jesus Christ, and the Israelites led by him to the promised land were a figure of the Christians led by Jesus Christ to heaven. Now, just as Christians through baptism are incorporated into Jesus Christ and made subject to him as their Lord, whose laws they are bound to observe, so for the Israelites the mysterious cloud and the crossing of the Red Sea were a kind of baptism, whereby they remained subject to Moses and obliged to observe his laws. From that moment on, the people were separated from Egypt forever and belonged to the God who liberated them and to the prophet-mediator whom God gave them as their leader.
The mysterious cloud, a perceptible sign of God's presence, and of the favour He bestowed on His people, was a figure of the Holy Spirit, who is given in the baptism of Jesus Christ, and similarly the dry-foot passage through the Red Sea and the consequent deliverance from the bondage of Pharaoh, were figures of our deliverance from the bondage of sin through the waters of baptism.
Having stated this truth, Paul reminds us that it is not enough to come out of Egypt to have the promised land. The going out is one thing, the conquest and possession of the land is another. Between going out and conquering the land, there is a whole desert to cross. For the Israelites, the desert lasted for forty years; for Christians it lasts their whole life.
With baptism we come out of the slavery of sin, with a life of perseverance striving to conquer the kingdom of heaven we walk towards the glorious resurrection that will take place on the last day.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(Gen 15:5-12.17-18)
Genesis 15:5 Then he led him out and said to him, "Look into the sky and count the stars, if you can count them," and he added, "Such shall be your offspring."
Genesis 15:6 And he believed the LORD, who credited it to him as righteousness.
Genesis 15:7 And he said to him, 'I am the LORD who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldees to give you possession of this land.
"Then he led him out and said to him, Look into the sky and count the stars, if you can count them, and he added, Such shall be your offspring." God leads Abraham out of the human way of seeing. Earthly eyes do not see so much. But when they rise up to contemplate the infinite, God's promise takes on its full value and scope. The foundation is laid for a salvation that concerns man and is infinitely above created reality.
"He believed the Lord, who credited it to him as righteousness". There are three components of Abraham's faith:
(a) Abraham believes (in Hebrew, the verb believe is "'āman" the same one that gives rise to the amen with which we conclude our prayers and means "to lean on...", "to trust in...". The patriarch trusts God and consigns himself and his future to him.
b) God "credited" this to him. The verb "accredit" is "ḥāšav", it is used in the Bible to indicate validly performed sacrifices. The new, true sacrifice to be offered to God is therefore the inner act of faith. It is no longer by grace that the Lord will give Abraham a numerous offspring. He will give it to him out of righteousness. God does not only give out of grace, he also gives out of righteousness.
c) "...as justice": Abraham becomes "righteous", that is, faithful to the covenant commitment that binds him to his God: faithful and righteous.
In what did Abraham believe? Not in a lineage limited and finite in time, but in an eternal lineage. And with that, the promise of a descendants becomes in itself the promise of salvation. In time, the figure of this salvation, which in reality will be a Saviour, will become more and more clearly delineated and manifested.
The act by virtue of which Abraham believed is the emblem and model of faith pleasing to God. Henceforth Abraham will live only by this divine promise, beyond and above all human appearances. It is not enough to come out of a world of perdition to find oneself immediately in a world of salvation. There is a time of patient waiting, of obedience, of perseverance, without which the journey stops halfway.
"And he said unto him, I am the Lord that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee possession of this land". God tells Abraham that he was brought out of Ur of the Chaldees precisely to possess the land of Canaan. The first step of faith, which is that of coming out, seems to be attributable solely to the work of God. Abraham was brought out of Ur. It is not imputed to him in justice that he came out of the old life, but that he entered into the new one, which is faith in God's promise, faith in the future coming of a Saviour.
Some might say: I believe in the existence of God, therefore I have faith in God. Believing that God exists does not necessarily entail a life of faith. Mere belief in the existence of God does not bring one into the life of God. True faith is more than mere mental assent to God's existence, it brings with it a radical change in how one stands before Him. Not to the God of my own thinking, but to the God who has historically manifested Himself. It is not enough to believe in a Creator God, we must believe in a God who is also Saviour.
And here the discourse of faith does not admit plurality of faiths. Faith, while presupposing the historical event of the death and resurrection of Christ, descendant of Abraham, Saviour of the world, necessarily entails the proclamation of this event, what we call by the name of Gospel. There can be no ecumenism unless we place before everyone the need for knowledge of the Gospel. One dialogues by announcing and one announces by dialoguing. Dialogue is not the search for a solution and a compromise that will please everyone, but to pass on the Word of God, the only one that saves, through the forms in which man can make it his own. Ecumenism must only deal with the form of the proclamation, it cannot and must not alter its substance.
There is only one door that leads to Paradise and that is the one opened by Christ and guarded by Peter. It is one thing to reflect on how the Gospel can be proclaimed to all, quite another to discuss salvation outside of Christ. One dialogues with those who do not believe for the purpose of proclaiming, one does not argue for failure to proclaim. There is no such thing as the good faith of those who do not believe; there is, and this is a fact, the bad faith of those who are deceived by Satan. Too many people believe in their own sincerity, goodness, to justify non-belief.
Why do we find the model of true faith in Abraham? Because listening to the Word of God in him overcomes and bypasses the ways of reason and the heart. Those who seek God must turn away and be wary of a faith other than that of Abraham. A precondition of faith is the willingness to come out of the old life (Ur of the Chaldees) and enter the new one (the promised land). He does not enter who has not gone out, and he has not gone out except he who is aware of sin. Having entered the faith in itself does not guarantee remaining in the faith. One can also fail and not be persevering to the end.
For many Catholics, all it takes is Sunday Mass, confession once a year, a few good works, not killing, not stealing... and everything is done. What is missing is the idea that being a Christian means living for Christ and not for oneself. As far as the Protestant church is concerned, the affirmation of a salvation that is given solely and exclusively by faith in Christ, is resolved in the easy psychological type of faith, as the conviction that we are only asked to accept with our hearts and minds the salvation wrought by Jesus. And if we sin we can rest easy, because eternal life is already given by divine election. If salvation is already given and assured, we can also set aside the instruments and gifts of grace bestowed by Christ through his Church and Tradition, the only guarantees of a correct understanding and a true relationship with Revelation.
In Protestantism, it is enough to appeal to one's own conscience, on a path of self-confirmation and self-approval. All by oneself, on one's own, without effort, without being disturbed in one's convictions, in a maximum exaltation of that individualism that is increasingly asserting itself in the world as a sign of the dominion of the devil, prince of this world.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(Rom 10:8-13)
Romans 10:8 What does it say then? Near you is the word, on your lips and in your heart: that is, the word of faith which we preach.
Romans 10:9 For if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe with your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
"What sayest thou then? Near you is the word, on your mouth and in your heart: that is, the word of faith which we preach." As Moses said that the word, that is, the law of God, was easy to know and to keep, so Paul says the same of the gospel. If the law has Christ as its end, if everything from Christ begins and ends in Christ, if all the word of Scripture conceals Christ, all the word of Scripture conceals the gospel, to which every word of the Old Testament leads and guides. "The word of faith which we preach" are the gospel truths necessary to believe in order to attain salvation, which, through the preaching of the apostles, are within the reach of all, so that all can say that they have them in their mouths and in their hearts, and there is no need to make long journeys or to endure great hardship in order to learn them. Christ is present in the word of faith that is proclaimed by the Church.
There are three truths that we must grasp in this sentence of Paul. The first is this: the word of the gospel, which is the word of Christ, is not foreign to man, it is not distant from him, not in a spatial-temporal sense, but in an existential sense. Man's existence yearns for this word, he seeks it. After all, every human search is a search for truth. Because of sin, this search loses its essence, but it is still a search for one's own being. Man seeks himself, but he does not find himself, and he does not find himself because he cannot find himself in Christ. Only by finding Christ does man find himself, but to find Christ one must find the word of Christ.
The second truth is this: the word must be preached, announced, proclaimed, so that every man hears it and by hearing it adheres to it through faith. If preaching is lacking, then the word remains distant from man, and if the word remains distant, Christ also remains distant. When the Church has done this, it will have helped man in his search for Christ, it will have helped man to find himself, to be himself. The Church exists to give Christ. This is the purpose and mandate the Church has received. That is why preaching is the very essence of the Church. Christ gives himself through the word, and without the word, Christ does not give himself, and if he does not give himself, those who seek him seek him in vain. For this the Church is responsible. The true sin of the Church, the only one she must always repent of, is the failure to evangelise, the failure to proclaim, the failure to preach the word of Jesus.
The third truth directs us instead to 'the word of faith'. The word is of faith because it announces a mystery that only by faith can be accepted and only by faith can one adhere to it. Without faith, the word remains a mute word. Faith and word are an inseparable unity. There could be the word without faith, but faith does not reveal the mystery, because the mystery is not revealed by the word, but by the Spirit who reveals himself to the heart and only manifests himself if there is faith in the heart.
What do we see today? One observes that Christ is as if forgotten. Traces of him are being lost. The word of preaching is purged of all content inherent in Christ, his truth and grace. What prevails in many today is the proposition of an entirely human, earthly, sometimes even diabolical justice. If the preaching of faith is omitted, Christ is omitted, righteousness according to faith is omitted, grace and truth are omitted. What remains? Man and his sin remains.
"For if thou shalt confess with thy mouth that Jesus is Lord, and shalt believe with thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." He who is professed in faith is Jesus Lord. Professing with one's mouth that Jesus is Lord and believing in one's heart that God raised him from the dead is the way to salvation. This means not only admitting the historical fact of the resurrection, but also accepting, from the depths of the soul, the whole work of salvation accomplished by Christ.
This confession must be an explicit testimony. Adherence to Christ can never be a private fact, lived intimately in one's own heart, in which it must still be rooted, but it must be publicly witnessed. One cannot be an anonymous Christian, a Christian of silence. The Christian is he who before the world confesses that Jesus is Lord, the Word, the only-begotten of the Father who became flesh in the womb of the Virgin Mary and who in his humanity and not only in his divinity was constituted Lord of every man. The term Kyrios (Lord) was used in the LXX Bible to translate YHWH and what Paul is telling us is that the confession of faith consists in believing that Jesus is the Messiah and that he is 'one' with Yahweh.
This confession must be clear-cut. There can be no gaps. That is why it is necessary for the Christian to confess with his mouth that Jesus is Lord, consubstantial with God by divine nature, consubstantial with man by human nature. If there is no right confession about the person of Jesus, one cannot be saved, because the Jesus we confess would no longer be the Jesus of God, but a Jesus modelled on human thoughts, and therefore an idol. Everything that man constructs with his mind is simply an idol, and the idol does not save. Instead, the Son of God who came in the flesh for the redemption of the world saves, and the Son of God who came in the flesh is the Lord of man.
It is not enough, however, to proclaim righteous faith with the mouth; the heart must also participate in it, and the heart participates in it by making the truth that is professed its own. From the profession of the mouth and the faith of the heart comes salvation for man. The salvation that Paul envisages is not simply deliverance from sin. Salvation is possessing the life of Christ and making this life the guiding principle of our life: actions, words, thoughts. This is why deliverance from sin alone is a very reductive concept of salvation.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books:
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(1Cor 15,54-58)
8th Sunday O.T. (C)
1 Corinthians 15:54 When then this corruptible body is clothed with incorruption and this mortal body with immortality, the word of Scripture will be fulfilled:
Death has been swallowed up for victory.
1 Corinthians 15:55 Where, O death, is thy victory?
Where, O death, is thy sting?
1Corinthians 15:56 The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law.
1Corinthians 15:57 Thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!
1Corinthians 15:58 Therefore, my dearly beloved brethren, remain steadfast and immovable, always labouring in the work of the Lord, knowing that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
Until the day of the final resurrection, death will reign over this earth and submerge every man. When, on the other hand, the Lord completes his last work, then death will be submerged forever in the victory of Christ. After that, death will no longer have power, it will be defeated forever, forever annulled. Man will enter his finality, and only then will we understand what Christ has truly done for us. Death, both physical and spiritual, only Christ has conquered it, only in Him will we conquer it today and on the last day. There are no other Messiahs, no other ways, no other faiths. The only Messiah is Jesus Christ, the only way is the resurrection of Jesus Christ, the only faith is the Word of the Lord, his Holy Gospel. Let those who seek elsewhere know that they will find nothing, for nothing exists.
Death will be ousted, rendered powerless, submerged by the victory of Christ. It that thought it had a deadly sting, finds itself stung by the victorious sting of Jesus Christ. She who thought she was the absolute ruler over man, by the man Jesus was defeated. It was Christ who died that overcame it with his resurrection. This is the mockery of death. Where no man could have succeeded, because he too was a prisoner and slave by birth of death, Christ triumphed. The victory of Christ is the resurrection, the cross is the victory over sin. By becoming in Christ one body and one life, we too on the cross together with Him overcome sin, and by overcoming sin we are led to complete victory over death.
For although the victory is accomplished in Christ, in His body, yet Paul says that the victory is ours: "He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. The victory is ours because it will be manifested in us. We are associated with Him who has made all things.
Now, from the heart of the Christian, our hymn of thanksgiving, praise and blessing must rise up to the Father. Thanksgiving is the highest form of worship. We can only give thanks if Christ's victory has already been made ours; we give thanks for a gift that we already possess, that has already transformed us.
He gives thanks to God for such a great gift whoever commits himself, works, toils, so that Christ's victory transforms his life entirely and he becomes in the world a visible image of Christ crucified and risen, of a spiritual man, who transmits through his life the path of hope to which every man is called. Thanksgiving is thus transformed into an obligation of holiness, to which we are called by the Father who has bestowed the victory of Christ on us and waits for us to live it totally in us.
«Therefore, my beloved brethren, remain steadfast and immovable, always labouring in the work of the Lord, knowing that your labour is not in vain in the Lord». In this concluding verse, Paul reiterates certain truths that must constitute the life of believers. The first is this: remain steadfast and immovable. In what? In the truth of Christ's resurrection and ours on the last day. The resurrection of Christ is the truth that gives consistency to all the other truths of our faith. If Christ's resurrection is not confessed with certainty of heart and mind, everything will ultimately be in vain and useless.
It is not enough, however, to remain firm and unshakable in this truth. One must be dedicated to the Lord's work. What is the work of the Lord? The fulfilment of his death and resurrection in us. Since the work of Christ was his death and resurrection, the work of the Lord for the Christian is also the fulfilment of Christ's death and resurrection in him. Christ's death is accomplished in the Christian through obedience to God's will. The work of the Lord to be done is to transform the word of Christ into life, as Christ transformed the word of the Father into life. Paul wants us to be prodigal in this work. To lavish ourselves means to spare ourselves in nothing, it means to expend all our physical and spiritual energy for the accomplishment of Christ's work in us.The third truth that we must always have in our hearts is this: whoever does the work of the Lord does the only true work, the only just work, the only holy work, the only work that has eternal value. Each of us, in every work we do, must ask ourselves whether what we do is the work of God. Only God's work is not in vain, and in doing it we do not waste our time and expend our energy uselessly. The work that will make our labour precious is only one: the fulfilment of Christ's death in us, so that his glorious resurrection on the last day may be accomplished in us.
If one sees Christianity in this way, one gives it another imprint; one gives it the imprint of seeking God's will so that it may be fulfilled in our lives. If one observes the life of a Christian community according to this vision of faith, then one becomes aware of all the vanities that surround it. Everything is done, except to fulfil each one individually and all together, each according to his part and vocation, the work of Christ, which is our death in Him in the greatest obedience to our Father who is in heaven.
True faith heals, renews existence, changes it, transforms it. Today, this is what is required of Christian communities: to start from the proclamation of true faith so that each one may begin in his or her own body the fulfilment of the Lord's work, which is the work of Christ, begun in us on the day of our baptism.
Knowing that your labour is not in vain in the Lord. This fervour in doing good must be kindled in us by the certainty of the prize. Our labour is not in vain, for it will make us worthy of the future resurrection, provided, however, that everything is done in the Lord, that is, in intimate union with Jesus Christ.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(1Cor 15,45-49)
1Corinthians 15:45 the first man, Adam, became a living being, but the last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
1Corinthians 15:46 There was not the spiritual body first, but the animal body, and then the spiritual.
1Corinthians 15:47 The first man from the earth is of the earth; the second man is from heaven.
1Corinthians 15:48 As the man made of the earth, so are they of the earth; but as the heavenly, so are they of the heavenly.
1Corinthians 15:49 And as we have borne the image of the man of earth, so shall we bear the image of the heavenly man.
In these verses Paul delves into the Adam-Christ parallelism. Adam, the first man, because of his sin was a bringer of death, disease, suffering, pain. He was also the cause of a concupiscent body, a body that was difficult for man himself to govern. Adam instead of a father of life proved to be a father of death, instead of freedom he proved to be a father of slavery, instead of salvation he became a father of perdition.
In his infinite and eternal mercy, God had from eternity foreseen an effective remedy against the death that Adam would bring into the world. Thinking of Jesus Christ, Saviour and Redeemer, He thought of Him as the life-giving spirit in order to work our redemption. How did He work it? Through His dead and resurrected body. That body that was clothed with divine and immortal life, with glory and incorruption, the Lord gives it as our food and drink of eternal life so that we too may become partakers of it, and be clothed with it.
Adam bequeathed a body of sin. This is our condition. Only those who become one with Christ can clothe the spiritual body. If we remain outside the body of Christ, we remain in the bondage of vice and sin; we dwell in our selfishness, we spend our days driven and tossed about by the concupiscence that makes us instinctive, passionate, proud, fanatical, transgressors.
To those who ask why the spiritual state, though more perfect, came after the more imperfect animal state, the apostle answers with a general principle: the natural order dictates that we begin with what is imperfect, and then move on to what is more perfect. God wanted to follow this law, and therefore established that the more perfect spiritual state should be preceded by the imperfect animal state.
We have received an animal body; through this body, in a path of truth we are called to clothe the heavenly body. The death of Christ enables us to set out on the journey, because the Holy Spirit in the waters of baptism clothes us with Christ. It is a journey towards acquiring our true humanity. It is a long journey, not easy, it costs the sacrifice and holocaust of our lives. There is only one way: remain anchored in Christ, become one with him.
Adam came from the earth because according to the Genesis account he was moulded from the dust of the ground. This is his origin. Jesus comes from heaven as the true God. He is not from heaven as a body. He assumed the body from the blessed Virgin Mary. He too therefore has a body that was taken from the flesh of Adam, although this flesh by a singular privilege is most holy, full of grace, from the first moment of its conception. The body of Jesus Christ was born in the greatest holiness, but it is still human flesh and therefore Jesus Christ also has a body that comes from the earth, otherwise he could not have redeemed us.
"What is earthly, such also are earthly; and what is heavenly, such also shall be heavenly." Each one produces according to his nature. Adam, who was taken from the dust of the ground, begat men in his image, also made of a material body. But Christ's gift is different: through his passion, death and resurrection his body has become spiritual, glorious. His body bears within itself the perfection of the divine image. By grace we will be in all things similar to his heavenly body, if we allow ourselves to be generated by God through faith. This is the greatest act of love with which God will clothe us tomorrow, if we allow ourselves to be clothed in our souls today through conversion, faithfulness to the gospel, that is, a life wholly made up of the word of Christ.
For "as we have borne the image of the earthly, so shall we also bear the image of the heavenly. By descent from Adam we bore the image of the earthly man; so by faith we shall bear the image of the heavenly man. Christ is in the glory of his spiritualised body. This is the image with which we shall one day be clothed. Towards the fulfilment of this truth we must walk.
The present moment is the place of the passage, that is, of this gestation in which progressively our animal life, our concrete everyday life, our existence, is lived in spiritual terms. And this is already the harbinger of resurrection. Death then will not be the failure of this life, but the next passage which is all a hymn to life. In baptism we have laid down the image of the earthly man and begun to bear the image of Jesus Christ, an image that will become perfect after the resurrection.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(1Cor 15:12.16-20)
6th Sunday in O.T. (year C)
1Corinthians 15:12 Now if it is preached that Christ rose from the dead, how can some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?
1Corinthians 15:16 For if the dead rise not, neither is Christ risen;
1Corinthians 15:17 But if Christ be not risen, your faith is vain, and ye are yet in your sins.
1Corinthians 15:18 And they also that are dead in Christ are lost.
1Corinthians 15:19 If then we have had hope in Christ only in this life, we are more to be pitied than all men.
Some Corinthians held Greek ideas concerning the immortality of the soul, namely that after death the soul separated from the body to be absorbed into the divine or to continue a tenuous existence in Ades, since for the Greeks physical resurrection was impossible. Paul has already said that Jesus Christ not only rose from the dead, he was also seen risen. There were many people who had the grace to see him. Yet, some in Corinth taught that there is no resurrection of the dead. On the one hand there is the whole gospel that is founded on the resurrection of Jesus, and on the other hand it is stated that the dead do not rise. This is not a contradiction on a marginal point of faith; it is a contradiction on the focal point of faith, indeed on faith itself, since our faith is the resurrection of Jesus Christ; together with his incarnation, passion and death. Either Christ is risen and the dead also rise, or the dead do not rise and Christ is not risen either.
Paul does not start from the resurrection of Jesus to refute the error of the Corinthians: he starts from the error of the Corinthians to draw all the consequences of their assertion and thus confront them with another truth that they would have to confess if their assertion were true: "if Christ has not risen, vain is your faith; you are still in your sins.
If Christ is not risen, besides having a vain faith, there is also a miserable state in which man finds himself: he is still in his sins. If Christ did not rise again for our justification, neither did he die for our sins, he just died. No resurrection implies no atonement. Jesus' unopened tomb would indicate that he too remained in the grip of death and that, consequently, the forgiveness of sins and the justification we sought in him are illusory: we are still in our bondage. We enter here into relativism and religious indifferentism. If sin is not taken away through our justification, there is no difference between the Christian and all other men in the world. The difference would only be one of form, but not of substance. We and others are all in our sins, and in them we live, but also die.
Another consequence: 'Even those who sleep in Christ have therefore perished. Not only we who are alive, are in our sins; also those who died believing and hoping in Christ, perished because Christ, not being the true Messiah, could not obtain remission of sins through faith in Him, and therefore passed into the next world with all their sins, which lead to perdition. From this last deduction, one thing becomes clear: faith in Christ (if he is not resurrected) is of no use to us, either in this life or the next. It does not serve us because it does not deliver us from death, it does not free us from sin, it does not obtain redemption, it does not bring us into the joy of heaven.
"If we have hoped in Christ for this life only, we are the most miserable of all men." A hope in Christ for this life only is not only vain, it is also deleterious; indeed it is an anti-human hope. Because of this faith, we must give up many things, which others enjoy, and endure all manner of travails and persecutions - sometimes even shedding our own blood. What then is the use of hoping in Christ in this life, without the hope of eternal life? What is the use of forcing oneself to sacrifice, to mortify oneself, to carry the cross every day, if all this ends in eternal death, since there would be no hope beyond death for those who have put their trust in Christ?
We are only to be pitied. We have renounced this world in the light of another world, but if Christ is not resurrected we have lost the pleasure of both worlds. Greater foolishness than this could not exist for a man. For this Christians would be to be pitied more than all men, for they are fools more than all men, and they are fools because they go after a faith which at its core is false, since they themselves, that is, those who profess it, would affirm that it is false, founded on a truth that does not exist.
How desirable it would be for Christians today to learn from Paul to draw the consequences of every statement they make concerning our most holy Faith! If they did this, they would understand that certain things cannot be affirmed; but if they are affirmed, it is right to draw conclusions and act accordingly. On many matters of faith today one could make the same argument as Paul. The results would be truly astonishing. But this is not done, and so man continues to live in his delusion. He thinks he has said it all, while in reality he does nothing but live by falsehood, deception and all kinds of other lies about the Lord, not only to his own detriment, but to the detriment of every man, Christian and non-Christian alike.
The strength of faith is in its arguments, in its deductions, in the consequences that must necessarily be drawn from a statement, whether true or false is of little importance, as long as one draws conclusions and knows how to deduce everything. All this ability is wisdom of the Holy Spirit and is given to those who love the truth, seek the truth, desire the truth; it is given to all those who love God and man; who do not want to be false witnesses of God; who do not want to be deceivers of their brothers.
We must always pray to the Lord to give us an open, wise, intelligent mind to immediately perceive the deadly trap that is hidden and concealed behind every statement that is in the guise of faith, while in reality it is pure lie, pure fantasy, pure imagination that has as its point of origin the heart of man and certainly not the heart of God. Reason is a precious asset of man. He must also know how to use it and use it well to discover the true and false of his statements; he must know how to use it to grasp the nuances of true and false that may be hidden in a word; he must know how to use it to arrive through a series of deductions and arguments at the truth itself. Faith needs reason, it needs it; not in order to demonstrate faith, which is based on proclamation alone, but because the truth of faith also possesses a rational path that must be developed.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(1Cor 15:1-11)
1Corinthians 15:1 I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I proclaimed to you and which you received, in which you stand firm,
1Corinthians 15:2 and from which also ye receive salvation, if ye hold it in that form in which I have proclaimed it unto you. Otherwise, you would have believed in vain!
This fifteenth chapter is devoted by Paul entirely to the problem and question of faith concerning the resurrection of Jesus Christ, in which he also sees and contemplates ours. It is the last doctrinal topic of the Epistle to the Corinthians, one of the main points of Christian doctrine, namely the resurrection of the dead. This dogma was denied by the Sadducees, mocked by the pagans, interpreted allegorically by some Christians, judged impossible and absurd by some Corinthians imbued with false philosophical ideas. Along with the resurrection, they probably also denied the immortality of the soul, or at least doubted it. The Apostle refutes these errors, proving the reality of the future resurrection, and then explaining the manner in which this mystery will be fulfilled, with the example of the resurrected Jesus and the lives of the believers and apostles.
In the first verse one can already glimpse the seriousness with which the apostle addresses the subject. The resurrection of Jesus is not one of the many tenets of faith, or one of the many truths that make up the revelation he proclaimed. The resurrection of Jesus is the Gospel he proclaimed to the Corinthians. It, alone, is Gospel. It, alone, is sufficient to firmly ground faith in Christ. From the resurrection of Christ, every other mystery of faith is made comprehensible and receives its proper value.
To produce fruits of eternal life, the Gospel must be composed of three essential moments: the proclamation of the Gospel, the acceptance of the Gospel, and standing firm in the Gospel. If any one of these moments is missing, the gospel is also missing. The gift of Christ to man is essential. If the Church does not give Christ to man, man loses Christ. Those who do not have the Church do not have Christ; the Christ they believe they possess is not the true Christ, it is not the Christ of faith, it is their Christ, made in their image and likeness. This 'Christ' that man gives himself is a pure idol. It is not God's gift to man. God gives Christ to man through his Church, starting with his apostles.
But it is not enough to give and receive the gift, it is necessary that in the gift we remain steadfast, anchored. Paul, in this, is of an unprecedented seriousness. He leaves no room for personal thoughts, for spontaneous reflections. The Gospel is proclaimed by the Church and the apostles, from the Church and the apostles one accepts it, one remains firm and well anchored in it, and through this faith, one comes into possession of salvation ('you are saved'), which will be given to us in all its fullness in the life to come.
Having stated the first principle of faith, another follows immediately. "If you keep it in that form in which I have proclaimed it to you". The necessary condition to obtain this salvation is to keep, that is, to firmly believe the Gospel as it was preached, without taking away or falsifying anything. Salvation is from the Gospel on only one condition: that it is maintained, kept intact, in the form in which the Church and the Apostles proclaimed it. If this does not happen, if the Gospel is changed, altered, it becomes ineffective as far as salvation is concerned. Faith placed in it is a vain faith, because it does not grant salvation.
There is an obligation, and it is an obligation of salvation, to keep the Gospel in its original form, to keep it in the heart and mind as it was proclaimed. He who wants salvation must receive the Gospel from the Church, but he must also keep it as the Church has delivered it to him. He cannot make any changes to it, on pain of losing his soul.
To believe in a personal Gospel and then lose one's soul (this means having 'believed in vain'), what is the use? Better to have no gospel than to have a false one; better to live in the way of the world than to live falsely in the way of God.
Paul's principles cannot be adapted to certain modern theology, which has ousted the gospel from its place, replacing it with human thoughts that have only the appearance of truth and faith. In truth they contain nothing of the liberating and redeeming power of the gospel. Much faith today is in vain; much faith does not lead to salvation, because it is founded on a modified Gospel, reduced to human thoughts.
This too must be said for the sake of truth; the salvation of many souls who have fallen into this trap prepared for them by many men who call themselves men of faith, while they have reduced the Gospel of God, the only word of eternal life, to vanity and foolishness.
Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
(Lk 2:22-40)
Luke 2:29 "Now let your servant, O Lord, be
go in peace according to your word;
Luke 2:30 for my eyes have seen your salvation,
Luke 2:31 prepared by you before all peoples,
Luke 2:32 light to enlighten the Gentiles
and the glory of your people Israel".
Very ancient is the liturgical use of the Nunc dimittis, prayed in the evening before going to sleep. What does it mean to pray the Nunc dimittis? It means first of all to confess that, having believed in God, it is now indifferent for us to die or to live, because by faith we know that we no longer see death. For the believer, true death lies behind us and is in baptism (Rom 6:3-11), so that the death that lies before us should no longer be a cause for anguish or fear. To every believer are addressed the words: "whoever lives and believes in me will not die eternally" (Jn 11:26), which Jesus said to Martha.
Repeating Simeon's words leads us to a confession of faith whereby we can tell God that he can now dismiss us from his service. By going to sleep we prepare ourselves for a moment of powerlessness, a moment in which we are not masters of anything, we prepare ourselves for sleep, which is a figure of death. With this canticle we prepare ourselves to welcome in peace the hour when we will die. To die is a difficult thing, and to die well is a rare grace, but if we practise every night to make sleep a prophecy of death, then we prepare ourselves to go towards death as to an encounter with the Lord.
With the Nunc dimittis we confess the Lord as the Master of our lives, he who by his power can call us to himself every day, and so we learn to make our lives a service from which we can ask to be dismissed.
To pray the Nunc dimittis is to thank God for the miracle of making us come to evening still with faith in him: this alone is a great miracle that must be acknowledged with thanksgiving. Asking each evening to be dismissed from the Lord's service teaches us that it is not for us to finish the work, but that it is for us only to believe and confess that God's work has been accomplished and completed in us. It is we who in our little faith think that we always have something to accomplish.
For the Lord we should always be ready, for he returns as a thief in the night. Before sleep, when night comes, we must be ready to lay down our breath in the Lord's hands, handing our existence back to him.
By praying the Nunc dimittis we also confess that we have seen salvation, that we have seen and recognised God's action. Even at the end of a day of suffering, of weeping, with the Nunc dimittis we acknowledge in faith that God works salvation even through events that make us suffer, that constitute a contradiction for us. But from faith descends the peace that makes us confess: 'we have seen with our own eyes the salvation of God'. And so we bring our whole day before the Lord, and if we have been faithful, then we ourselves will have been 'light of the world'. Even our day, though marked by our weaknesses, will have been light to the heathen, to the unbelievers, to all the people we have encountered.
Even the events that have contradicted us must therefore be considered as something good through which the Lord leads us. After all, Simeon, now old and without a relevant role, is contradicted in his life. Anna, in her condition of old age and widowhood, also experiences events of contradiction. In the first two chapters of Luke we encounter barrenness, poverty, irrelevance, all events of contradiction that run through the lives of all men of God in this part of the gospel. Yet it is precisely these who see themselves superabundantly rewarded by the Lord.
So even amidst the events of contradiction we are called to walk and carry out our mission. According to Luke, the mission was carried out by Simeon, by Anna, not by those who had been commissioned. The one who says: "I am the light of the world" (Jn 8:12) is also the one who says: "You are the light of the world" (Mt 5:14), associating us with his mission, which takes place both in our abasement and in our success.
This opens us up to great freedom in our Christian life and in our calling: whether successful or stoned, we must move forward in obedience to God's promise, not stopping at the contradictions of each day.
If we have lived obedience during the day, we have been light in the world. But in this world we are also the glory of Israel, because Christians, the church, are the missionaries of Israel in the world.
Behold, the Nunc dimittis is truly what seals our day. Simeon sang it at the end, at the sunset of his life; we sing it every evening, at the end of our days, waiting to do it at the end of our existence, at the evening of our lives. Argentino Quintavalle, author of the books
- Revelation - exegetical commentary
- The Apostle Paul and the Judaizers - Law or Gospel?
Jesus Christ true God and true Man in the Trinitarian mystery
The prophetic discourse of Jesus (Matthew 24-25)
All generations will call me blessed
Catholics and Protestants compared - In defence of the faith
(Buyable on Amazon)
Because of this unique understanding, Jesus can present himself as the One who reveals the Father with a knowledge that is the fruit of an intimate and mysterious reciprocity (John Paul II)
In forza di questa singolare intesa, Gesù può presentarsi come il rivelatore del Padre, con una conoscenza che è frutto di un'intima e misteriosa reciprocità (Giovanni Paolo II)
Yes, all the "miracles, wonders and signs" of Christ are in function of the revelation of him as Messiah, of him as the Son of God: of him who alone has the power to free man from sin and death. Of him who is truly the Savior of the world (John Paul II)
Sì, tutti i “miracoli, prodigi e segni” di Cristo sono in funzione della rivelazione di lui come Messia, di lui come Figlio di Dio: di lui che, solo, ha il potere di liberare l’uomo dal peccato e dalla morte. Di lui che veramente è il Salvatore del mondo (Giovanni Paolo II)
It is known that faith is man's response to the word of divine revelation. The miracle takes place in organic connection with this revealing word of God. It is a "sign" of his presence and of his work, a particularly intense sign (John Paul II)
È noto che la fede è una risposta dell’uomo alla parola della rivelazione divina. Il miracolo avviene in legame organico con questa parola di Dio rivelante. È un “segno” della sua presenza e del suo operare, un segno, si può dire, particolarmente intenso (Giovanni Paolo II)
That was not the only time the father ran. His joy would not be complete without the presence of his other son. He then sets out to find him and invites him to join in the festivities (cf. v. 28). But the older son appeared upset by the homecoming celebration. He found his father’s joy hard to take; he did not acknowledge the return of his brother: “that son of yours”, he calls him (v. 30). For him, his brother was still lost, because he had already lost him in his heart (Pope Francis)
Ma quello non è stato l’unico momento in cui il Padre si è messo a correre. La sua gioia sarebbe incompleta senza la presenza dell’altro figlio. Per questo esce anche incontro a lui per invitarlo a partecipare alla festa (cfr v. 28). Però, sembra proprio che al figlio maggiore non piacessero le feste di benvenuto; non riesce a sopportare la gioia del padre e non riconosce il ritorno di suo fratello: «quel tuo figlio», dice (v. 30). Per lui suo fratello continua ad essere perduto, perché lo aveva ormai perduto nel suo cuore (Papa Francesco)
Doing a good deed almost instinctively gives rise to the desire to be esteemed and admired for the good action, in other words to gain a reward. And on the one hand this closes us in on ourselves and on the other, it brings us out of ourselves because we live oriented to what others think of us or admire in us (Pope Benedict)
Quando si compie qualcosa di buono, quasi istintivamente nasce il desiderio di essere stimati e ammirati per la buona azione, di avere cioè una soddisfazione. E questo, da una parte rinchiude in se stessi, dall’altra porta fuori da se stessi, perché si vive proiettati verso quello che gli altri pensano di noi e ammirano in noi (Papa Benedetto)
Since God has first loved us (cf. 1 Jn 4:10), love is now no longer a mere “command”; it is the response to the gift of love with which God draws near to us [Pope Benedict]
Siccome Dio ci ha amati per primo (cfr 1 Gv 4, 10), l'amore adesso non è più solo un « comandamento », ma è la risposta al dono dell'amore, col quale Dio ci viene incontro [Papa Benedetto]
don Giuseppe Nespeca
Tel. 333-1329741
Disclaimer
Questo blog non rappresenta una testata giornalistica in quanto viene aggiornato senza alcuna periodicità. Non può pertanto considerarsi un prodotto editoriale ai sensi della legge N°62 del 07/03/2001.
Le immagini sono tratte da internet, ma se il loro uso violasse diritti d'autore, lo si comunichi all'autore del blog che provvederà alla loro pronta rimozione.
L'autore dichiara di non essere responsabile dei commenti lasciati nei post. Eventuali commenti dei lettori, lesivi dell'immagine o dell'onorabilità di persone terze, il cui contenuto fosse ritenuto non idoneo alla pubblicazione verranno insindacabilmente rimossi.