Dedication of the Basilica of St. John Lateran [9 November 2025]

May God bless us and may the Virgin protect us! Let us be moved by Jesus' zeal for his Church, which he loves and wants to remain whole and faithful.

First Reading from the Book of Ezekiel (47:1-12)

Before rereading Ezekiel's vision, it is useful to recall the plan of the Temple that he knew, that of Solomon. Unlike our churches, the Temple was a large esplanade divided into courtyards: those of the pagans, of women and of men. The Temple itself had three parts: the open air with the altar of burnt offerings, the Vestibule, the Holy Place and the Holy of Holies. For Israel, the Temple was the centre of religious life: the only place of pilgrimage and sacrifice. Its destruction in 587 BC represented a total collapse, not only physical but also spiritual. The question was: would faith collapse with it? How could they survive after the destruction? Ezekiel, deported to Babylon in 597 BC, found himself on the banks of the Kebar River in Tel Aviv. During the twenty years of exile (ten before and ten after the destruction), he devoted all his energies to keeping the people's hope alive. He had to act on two fronts: to survive and to keep alive the hope of return. As a priest, he spoke mainly in terms of worship and visions, many of which concerned the Temple. Surviving meant understanding that the Temple was not the place of God's presence, but its sign. God was not among the ruins, but with his people on the Kebar. As Solomon said: 'The heavens themselves and the heavens of heavens cannot contain you! How much less this House that I have built!' (1 Kings 8:27). God is always in the midst of his people and does not abandon Israel: before, during and after the Temple, he is always in the midst of his people. Even in misfortune, faith deepens. The hope of return is firm because God is faithful and his promises remain valid. Ezekiel imagines the Temple of the future and describes abundant water flowing from the Temple towards the east, bringing life everywhere: the Dead Sea will no longer be dead, like the Paradise of Genesis (Genesis 1). This message tells his contemporaries: paradise is not behind us, but ahead of us; dreams of abundance and harmony will be realised. The reconstruction of the Temple, a few decades later, was perhaps the result of Ezekiel's stubborn hope. Perhaps in memory of Ezekiel and the hope he embodied, the capital of Israel is now called Tel Aviv, 'hill of spring'.

Responsorial Psalm 45/46

The liturgy of the Feast of Dedication offers only a division of Psalm 45/46, but it is useful to read it in its entirety. It is presented as a canticle of three stanzas separated by two refrains (vv. 8 and 12): 'The Lord of hosts is with us; our bulwark is the God of Jacob'. God, king of the world. First stanza: God's dominion over the cosmic elements (earth, sea, mountains). Second stanza: Jerusalem, "the city of God, the most holy dwelling place of the Most High" (v. 5). Third stanza: God's dominion over the nations and over the whole earth: "I rule the nations, I rule the earth". The refrain has a tone of victory and war: the Lord of the universe is with us.... The name 'Sabaoth' means 'Lord of hosts', a warrior title that at the beginning of biblical history referred to God as the head of the Israelite armies. Today it is interpreted as God of the universe, referring to the heavenly armies. The second verse is about the River. The evocation of a river in Jerusalem, which in reality does not exist, is surprising. The water supply was guaranteed by springs such as Gihon and Ain Roghel. The river is not real, but symbolic: it anticipates Ezekiel's prophecy of a miraculous river that will irrigate the entire region as far as the Dead Sea. Similarities can be found in Joel and Zechariah, where living waters flow from Jerusalem and bring life everywhere, showing God as king of all the earth. All the hyperbole in the Psalm anticipates the Day of God, the final victory over all the forces of evil. The warlike tone in the refrains and in the last verse ("Exalted among the nations, exalted on earth") means that God fights against war itself. The Kingdom of God will be established over the whole earth, over all peoples, and all wars will end. Jerusalem, the "City of Peace," symbolises this dream of harmony and prosperity. For some commentators, the River also represents the crowds that pass through Jerusalem during the great processions.

Second Reading from the First Letter of Saint Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians (3:9...17)

The deepest desire of the Old Testament was that God would be forever present among his people, establishing a kingdom of peace and justice. Ezekiel expresses this with the prophetic name of Jerusalem: 'The Lord is there'. However, the fulfilment of this promise exceeds all expectations: God himself becomes man in Jesus of Nazareth, 'the Word who became flesh and dwelt among us'. St Paul, rereading the Old Testament, recognises that the whole history of salvation converges towards Christ, the eternal centre of God's plan. When the time is fulfilled, God manifests his presence no longer in a place (the Temple of Jerusalem), but in a person: Jesus Christ, and in those who, through Baptism, are united to him. The Gospels show this mystery of God's new presence in various ways: the Presentation in the Temple, the tearing of the veil at the moment of Jesus' death, the water flowing from his side (the new Temple from which life flows), and the purification of the Temple. All these signs indicate that in Christ, God dwells definitively among men. After the Resurrection, God's presence continues in his people: the Holy Spirit dwells in believers. Paul affirms this forcefully: "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you." This reality has a twofold dimension: Ecclesial: the community of believers is the new temple of God, built on Christ, the cornerstone. Everything must be done for the common good and to be a living sign of God's presence in the world. Personal: every baptised person is a "temple of the Holy Spirit." The human body is a holy place where God dwells, and for this reason it must be respected and cared for. The new Temple is not a material building, but a living reality, constantly growing, 'a temple that expands without end', as Cardinal Daniélou said: humanity transformed by the Spirit. Finally, Paul warns: 'If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him'. The dignity of the believer as the dwelling place of God is sacred and inviolable. Christ's promise to Peter is the guarantee: 'The powers of evil will not prevail against my Church'. In summary: God, who in the Old Testament dwelt in a temple of stone, in the New Testament dwells in Christ and, through the Spirit, in the hearts and community of believers. The Church and every Christian are today the living sign of God's presence in the world.

From the Gospel according to John (2:13-22)

Trade on the Temple esplanade. In the Gospel of John (chapter 2), Jesus performs one of his most powerful and symbolic acts: he drives the merchants out of the Temple in Jerusalem. The episode takes place at the beginning of his public mission and reveals the profound meaning of his presence in the world: Jesus is the new Temple of God. In Jesus' time, the presence of animal sellers and money changers around the Temple was a normal and necessary practice: pilgrims had to buy animals for sacrifices and exchange Roman money, which bore the emperor's image, for Jewish coins. The problem was not the activity itself, but the fact that the merchants had invaded the Temple esplanade, transforming the first courtyard – intended for prayer and reading the Word – into a place of commerce. Jesus reacted with prophetic force: 'Do not make the house of the Father a market'. He thus denounced the transformation of worship into economic interest and reaffirmed that one cannot serve two masters, God and money. His words echo those of the prophets: Jeremiah had denounced the Temple as a 'den of thieves' (Jer 7:11), and Zechariah had announced that, on the day of the Lord, 'there shall be no more merchants in the house of the Lord' (Zech 14:21). Jesus follows in this prophetic line and brings their words to fulfilment. Two attitudes emerge in response to Jesus' gesture: the disciples, who know him and have already seen his signs (as at Cana), understand the prophetic meaning of the gesture and recall Psalm 68(69): "Zeal for your house consumes me." John changes the tense of the verb ("will consume me") to announce Jesus' future passion, a sign of his total love for God and for humanity. His opponents ("the Jews" in John) react with mistrust and irony: they ask Jesus to justify his authority and refuse to be admonished by him. To their request for a sign, Jesus responds with mysterious words: "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." They think of the stone Temple, restored by Herod in forty-six years, a symbol of God's presence among the people. But Jesus is speaking of another temple: his body. Only after the resurrection do the disciples understand the meaning of his words: the true Temple, the sign of God's presence, is no longer a building, but the person of the risen Jesus himself, 'the stone rejected by the builders, which has become the cornerstone'. This episode, placed by John at the beginning of his Gospel, already announces the whole Christian mystery: Jesus is the new place of encounter with God, the living Temple where man finds salvation. The ancient cult is outdated: it is no longer a matter of offering material sacrifices, but of welcoming and following Christ, who offers himself for humanity. Faith divides: some (the disciples) welcome this newness and become children of God; others (the opponents) reject it and close themselves off to revelation. Jesus, by driving the merchants out of the Temple, reveals that the true house of God is not made of stones but of people united with Him. His risen body is the new Temple, the definitive sign of God's presence among men. The episode thus becomes a prophecy of Easter and an invitation to purify the heart, so that God's dwelling place may never become a place of interest, but remain a space of faith, communion and love.

+ Giovanni D'Ercole

Mammon in the small and in the big

(Lk 16:9-15)

The opportunist who was taking advantage of the goods of the community (vv.1-8) knew how to make great speeches - perhaps instrumental - on the necessary solidarity, but he did not live concrete fraternity.

Here, then, is a catechesis of Lk on fidelity in the small and in the great: very topical teaching.

«He who is faithful in a minimal thing, is faithful even in a great thing, and he who is unjust in a minimal thing, is unjust even in a great thing» (Lk 16:10).

To give concrete support and to risk one’s life - putting one hand on one’s conscience and one in wallet - is unfortunately still tiring and rare.

Well, the fairest world is laborious, «craftsmanship» work (FT n.217).

In the evangelist’s intention, the particular story alluded to in the previous vv. was to serve to concretely form his small communities on the use of material goods.

Originally all the communities arose among the destitute. Little by little they began to appear even wealthy.

The entry of the rich - initially well seen - brought many problems over time, including internal management of collective resources.

The commons sometimes became the exclusive preserve of leaders who no longer seemed to have clear ideas about the social role of money.

Obviously, to introduce this model of sharing, the choice had to start from closely: one could not oppress sisters and brothers of faith, and preach justice to the world.

Emancipation begins in the small of one’s family, acquaintances and friends; in the change of internal and daily relationships.

The fact is that God and Mammon give opposite orders. One distorts the other.

Well, sooner or later even those motivated by excellent intentions can come to despise the Father, Communion, the ideals lived even in day-to-day events - and get attached to banal shortcuts.

The official religious leaders, all congregated in the defense of the lavish gains secured by the ancient world (world supported with drawn sword) were indeed honouring the Eternal in the signs, but... they yielded to temptation.

Now devoid of both basic and detailed choices, the directors laughed behind Jesus' back, scheming secretly and in concert. Still today, unfortunately, treating Him as a naive dreamer  (vv.14-15).

Yet the Master continues to educate us, so that we too may enter into his new «proactive» economy [as the bishops of South Africa, and the recent social encyclical, would perhaps define it].

Economy of gratuitousness that doesn’t impoverish - rather, it’s for a greatest «wealth as possible» that extinguishes the «desire to dominate», but makes stand «together as human beings» (FT n.229).

Here the small one becomes relevant. The challenge is open.

To internalize and live the message:

Are you generically supportive or? fraternal in conquibus?

Have you experienced the gift that does not impoverish but enriches?

[Saturday 31st wk. in O.T.  November 8, 2025]

Honest administrators – at various levels – and our everyone’s Home

(Lk 16:9-15)

'Ultimately,' says Jesus, 'you must decide: "You cannot serve both God and mammon" (Lk 16:13). Mammon is a term of Phoenician origin that evokes economic security and success in business; we could say that wealth is the idol to which everything is sacrificed in order to achieve material success, and thus this economic success becomes a person's true god. A fundamental decision is therefore necessary" [Pope Benedict, homily in Velletri, 23 September 2007].

"Whoever is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and whoever is unjust in a very little thing is unjust also in much" (Lk 16:10).

The church leader who was "caught" taking advantage of the community's assets (vv. 1-8) knew how to make grand speeches - perhaps instrumental ones - about the need for solidarity, but he did not live out concrete fraternity.

Here, then, is a catechesis from Luke on faithfulness in small and great things: a very timely teaching. Even today, in fact, there is no shortage of leaders who make grand proclamations... which are widely heard, but only to give themselves an air of importance.

Providing concrete help and risking one's life - putting one hand on one's conscience and the other in one's wallet - remains, unfortunately, a difficult and rare thing.

Many find nothing better than to turn their heads away and dodge the issue, delegating blame and responsibility to 'the system', to the current crisis, etc. - not without concrete reasons or grounds.

Instead, as Pope Francis' social encyclical emphasises, a more just world is a 'laborious, artisanal' work (FT n.217).

'And I say to you, make friends for yourselves with the unrighteous mammon, so that when it fails, they may receive you into the eternal tents.

Whoever is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and whoever is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much.

If then you have not been faithful with the unjust mammon, who will entrust you with the true [wealth]?

And if you have not been faithful with the [wealth] of others, who will give you your own?" (Lk 16:9-12).

In the evangelist's intention, the particular story alluded to in the preceding verses was intended to serve as a concrete example for his small communities on the use of material goods.

After a mistake that even leaders can make, even unrighteous wealth can be put to good use for the benefit of all - to create on earth that climate of serene vitality that is indestructible, which is a trait and attribute of the divine condition.

In the authentic Church, the poor—oppressed, degraded, impoverished and made destitute by a competitive society—find esteem, hope and a will to live, with the simple help of brothers and sisters who are equally needy.

In fact, all communities originally arose among the destitute. Little by little, the wealthy also began to appear.

It seemed like a great opening to God's future; instead, as time passed, there was a growing insensitivity and closed-heartedness among the new wealthy classes and in the churches.

The entry of the rich – initially well regarded – brought many problems over time, including the internal management of collective resources.

Common goods sometimes became the exclusive preserve of leaders who seemed to no longer have clear ideas about the social role of money.

The early Christians understood that faith in the resurrection is incompatible with attachment to the ephemeral. But it was a risky condition.

In this regard, the indirect testimony of Lucian of Samosata (125-192), author of satires against superstition and credulity, which also included Christianity, is significant.

In light-hearted language, he describes in 'The Death of Peregrine' [De morte Peregrini, 13] the impact that faith had on the lives of Christians of his time, and with unconventional firmness:

'Their first lawgiver persuades them that they are all brothers to one another, and as they convert, renouncing the Greek gods, they worship that wise crucified man and live according to his laws. For this reason, they despise all possessions equally and believe them to be common, and they do not care for them when they have them. Therefore, if a shrewd impostor arose among them who knew how to manipulate them, he would immediately become rich, mocking these gullible and foolish people."

The liberation from the idols of private property that Jesus proposed stimulated even the most agile and established souls to appreciate the transformation of property in relation to the lives and possibilities of others.

Obviously, in order to introduce this model of sharing and encounter the outside world, the choice had to start close to home: one could not oppress sisters and brothers of faith and preach justice to the world.

Emancipation begins in the small sphere of one's own family, acquaintances and friends; in the small change of internal and daily relationships.

The fact is that God and money give opposite orders. One distracts the other.

So sooner or later, even those motivated by good intentions can come to despise the Father, the Communion, the ideals lived even in summary - and become attached to trivial shortcuts.

The official religious leaders, all united in defending the lavish earnings secured by the ancient world - which they (greedily) upheld with drawn swords - honoured the Eternal One in signs, but... gave in to temptation.

Now deprived of both fundamental and detailed choices, the leaders laughed behind Jesus' back, plotting secretly and in concert. Even today, unfortunately, they treat him as a naive dreamer (vv. 14-15).

Yet the Master continues to shout himself hoarse, so that we too may enter into his new 'proactive' economy [as the bishops of South Africa and the recent social encyclical might define it].

An economy of gratuitousness that does not impoverish - for the 'greatest possible wealth' that extinguishes the 'desire to dominate' but makes us 'be together as human beings' (FT n.229).

Here the small becomes significant. The challenge is open.

To internalise and live the message:

Are you generically supportive or... fraternal in conquibus?

Have you experienced the gift that does not impoverish but enriches?

In the ecclesial sphere, have you felt deprived or, on the contrary, humanised?

The Evangelist follows the parable of the dishonest steward with a short series of sayings and recommendations on the relationship we must have with money and the goods of this earth. These short sentences are an invitation to a choice that presupposes a radical decision, a constant inner tension. Life is truly always a choice: between honesty and dishonesty, between fidelity and infidelity, between selfishness and altruism, between good and evil. The conclusion of this Gospel passage is incisive and peremptory: "No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other". Ultimately, Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon" (Lk 16: 13). Mammon is a term of Phoenician origin that calls to mind economic security and success in business; we might say that riches are shown as the idol to which everything is sacrificed in order to attain one's own material success; hence, this economic success becomes a person's true god. As a result, it is necessary to make a fundamental decision between God and mammon, it is necessary to choose between the logic of profit as the ultimate criterion for our action, and the logic of sharing and solidarity. If the logic of profit prevails, it widens the gap between the poor and the rich, as well as increasing the ruinous exploitation of the planet. On the other hand, when the logic of sharing and solidarity prevails, it is possible to correct the course and direct it to a fair development for the common good of all. Basically, it is a matter of choosing between selfishness and love, between justice and dishonesty and ultimately, between God and Satan. If loving Christ and one's brethren is not to be considered as something incidental and superficial but, rather, the true and ultimate purpose of our whole existence, it will be necessary to know how to make basic choices, to be prepared to make radical renouncements, if necessary even to the point of martyrdom. Today, as yesterday, Christian life demands the courage to go against the tide, to love like Jesus, who even went so far as to sacrifice himself on the Cross. 

We could then say, paraphrasing one of St Augustine's thoughts, that through earthly riches we must procure for ourselves those true and eternal riches: indeed, if people exist who are prepared to resort to every type of dishonesty to assure themselves an always unpredictable material well-being, how much more concerned we Christians must be to provide for our eternal happiness with the goods of this earth (cf. Discourses, 359, 10). Now, the only way of bringing our personal talents and abilities and the riches we possess to fruition for eternity is to share them with our brethren, thereby showing that we are good stewards of what God entrusts to us. Jesus said: "He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and he who is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much" (Lk 16: 10).

[Pope Benedict, homily in Velletri, 23 September 2007]

5. All the just of the earth, including those who do not know Christ and his Church, who, under the influence of grace, seek God with a sincere heart (cf. Lumen gentium, n. 16), are thus called to build the kingdom of God by working with the Lord, who is its first and decisive builder. Therefore, we must entrust ourselves to his hands, to his Word, to his guidance, like inexperienced children who find security only in the Father:  "Whoever does not accept the kingdom of God like a child", Jesus said, "shall not enter it" (Lk 18: 17).

With this thought we must make our own the petition:  "Thy kingdom come!". A petition which has risen to heaven many times in human history like a great breath of hope:  "May the peace of your kingdom come to us", Dante exclaimed in his paraphrase of the Our Father (Purgatorio, XI, 7). A petition which turns our gaze to Christ's return and nourishes the desire for the final coming of God's kingdom. This desire however does not distract the Church from her mission in this world, but commits her to it more strongly (cf. CCC, n. 2818), in waiting to be able to cross the threshold of the kingdom, whose seed and beginning is the Church (cf. Lumen gentium, n. 5), when it comes to the world in its fullness. Then, Peter assures us in his Second Letter, "there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" (2 Pt 1: 11).

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience, 6 December 2000]

This, Francis emphasised, is how 'real change is made in the Church, with people who know how to fight in small and large ways'. In this regard, the Pope addressed the 'tension' that is sometimes felt 'between small and large ways', whereby some say: ' No, I don't do these small things, I was born for great things." You are wrong," and, on the contrary, those who say: "Ah, I can't do great things, I do small things." You are a coward." The small and the great, on the other hand, "go together" and "a Christian must have this charism, of the small and the great." As we read, he recalled, "on the tomb of a great saint" where it is written: "Do not be afraid to do great things and at the same time take small things into account."
[Pope Francis, St. Martha's, 10 May 2019, in L'Osservatore Romano]

Christian shrewdness: sense of duty and of the fair 'Master'

(Lk 16:1-8)

In «The death of Peregrinus» [De morte Peregrini, 13] the irreverent Lucian of Samosata, polemist of second century - expresses himself as follows towards Christians:

«Their first Legislator persuades them that they are all brothers among themselves, and, as they convert, denying the Greek Gods, they adore that “wise” Crucifix, and live according to his laws. For wich they despise all goods equally and believe them as common and do not care when they have them. Therefore if among them arose a shrewd impostor who knew how to handle them well, immediately he would become rich, mocking these gullible and silly people».

Even more so than private individuals, ecclesial society manages goods for itself that are common, sacred and not exclusive.

But a responsible, community leader [cf. v.14], is accused of taking advantage of his position as administrator of the goods of God and the church.

The Torah, the specific regulations and all the official customs of the ancient East prohibited asking for interest on supplies (or loans) of foodstuffs.

However, under the counter the landowners relied on blackmail. Withholding undue and lavish compensation, on transactions.

Then the "opportunist" puts the right evaluation into play: he recalculates and aligns accountings - renouncing the illicit income he had hoped to enjoy firsthand.

Although used to going head-on in society, the old man finally chooses not to continue stubbornly in scaming of the percentages in addition, which were not due to him.

He seizes the opportunity that presents itself on his way. This is the point that Lk emphasizes. And he promptly decides not to continue to corrupt himself and others: valid option.

He’s therefore praised (v.8) because he realizes another possibility. And he does it with fair ‘cunning’, this time not random.

Spiritual Way has a raw crossroads: to ask oneself whether to start again in the style of accumulation-and-withhold, or to focus on the quality of relationships.

Excellent work of the Faith in ecclesial experience - and threshold of joy - is to transform resources into Life and Relationship.

In short, a spiritualism of sentimental character is not enough. We must heal the budgets and avoid the internal business groups [cf. v.14].

Justice and the universal destination of goods are not mere additions, the meaning of which can be blurred.

Once the truth has been restored, here is a beautiful method to «purify» even the unfair wealth: to use it for the recipients.

Despite mistakes that can be made - we may always impose on ourself a decisive turn.

In short, the fullness of the God’s Kingdom is realized through Encounter, and goods make sense as a possibility of human development (vv.9-13).

Therefore, spiritual guides must be the first witnesses of this social, humanizing and divine function.

They are called upon to dispose of common resources in a way that’s neither cheerful nor carefree, but with a strong sense of responsibility - without any shadow.

[Friday 31st wk. in O.T.  November 7, 2025]

Christian shrewdness: sense of duty and of the fair 'Master'

(Lk 16:1-8)

We ask ourselves: is there another way of life, beyond the habit of asserting oneself in all circumstances? What is it that generates so much friction without rest or criterion, even in times of submission? What is the solution for building a common house? And the first concrete step for the future?

Luke speaks very clearly, chiselling a catechesis probably taken from a living experience that has marked the environment of believers.

In "The Death of Peregrinus" [De morte Peregrini, 13] the irreverent Lucian of Samosata - a polemicist of the 2nd century - expresses himself with regard to Christians as follows:

"Their first Lawgiver persuades them that they are all brothers among themselves, and as they convert, denying the Greek gods, they worship that wise Crucified One, and live according to his laws. For something they despise all goods equally and believe them to be common and do not care when they have them. Therefore if a shrewd impostor arose among them who knew how to handle them well, he would immediately become rich, mocking these gullible and foolish people".

Let us hypothesise the situation, probably referring to a veteran of the Judeo-Christian circle [considered in the Gospels to be that of the "Pharisees" returning to the assemblies of the early times] (cf. Lk 16:14).

A manager, a community leader [cf. v.14], is accused of profiting from the position of steward of God's and the church's property.

The Torah, specific regulations, and all the official customs of the ancient East forbade charging interest on supplies (or loans) of foodstuffs.

But in fact and under the table, landlords used blackmail. By withholding undue and lavish fees, on transactions.

The skimming rate depended on the ability to scrutinise needs and raise the interest rate - even on wheat, oil and staple food.

Even the church coordinator had allowed himself to be seduced by the current malpractice, for easy profit (on people's hunger).

Having turned a deaf ear for a long time, the scandal emerges (among leaders and groups bearing the Christian name!).

The leading man is cornered for a transparent accounting.

Then the 'pinched' man chooses to recalculate and align the accounts - renouncing the illicit income that he had fondly enjoyed himself.

Everything should have been put at the disposal of the faithful and the common good, without (uncontrolled - usual) scheming.

Although accustomed to going head over heels in society, the guy finally chooses not to stubbornly continue in the stubborn imbroglio of additional dues he was not entitled to.

The (God's) treasures are to be shared, without private mark-up - so he avoids grasping at straws, pirouetting, seeking the support of accomplices or gangs [cf. v.14] and groups of sharers.

He seizes the opportunity that comes his way. This is the point that Lk emphasises. And he promptly decides not to continue corrupting himself and others: a valid option.

Things are obvious and he does not advance the kind of explanations - as unfortunately happens - that chronicle and degenerate the situation.

He is therefore praised (v.8) because instead of going back to feeding himself and his tail... he notices another possibility.

There is an Elsewhere to be perceived, here; with foresighted inner tension and equitable 'shrewdness', this time not aleatory.

The Spiritual Path has a stark crossroads: to ask oneself whether to start again in the accumulation-and-retreat style, or to focus on the quality of relationships.

No more intimidation such as: "You don't know who I am"; "You don't know who and how many of us there are" - and attempts tacked on to the bottom line.

No more shenanigans to conceal and destructive subterfuges for the sake of cheerful administration: better to disfigure personally than to be an active and omerto accomplice of another 'god' (the one who gives orders opposite to the Father's advice).

The excellent work of Faith in Church experience - and the threshold of joy - is to transform resources into Life and Relationship.

This is our Guide for tomorrow and happiness, always.

Justice and the universal destination of goods are not mere additions to the devout goings-on, the meaning of which may be blurred - even where community appurtenances are the prerogative of those who have their hands and feet all over the place: cliques with good manners and bad habits.

There is another utility and functionality of the old uninhibited profits: not those of the liberal economy and private property, but of free friendship, which does not hold back - the ability to recreate balances where they are not; to cultivate equality and transparency, happiness and widespread life.

Sentimental spiritualism is not enough. Balances must be healed.Having re-established the truth, and without looking into the face of any primate, or 'fellow travellers' or pressure groups, here is a beautiful method to 'purify' even unequal wealth: use it for the recipients.

It is the only fair valuation, which annihilates malpractice and the strange competitions between dowry-less and upside-down poor who seem destined only to fry.

We are called upon to use 'our' energies and resources to expand everyone's existence, instead of continuing to peck and paw at each other to show who is in charge.

This is - despite the mistakes we may make - giving the decisive breakthrough, for a beautiful life.

In short, the fullness of the Kingdom of God is realised through encounter, and goods have meaning as a possibility for human development (cf. vv.9-13).

In the encyclical Fratelli Tutti we read in n.120:

"the Christian tradition has never recognised the right to private property as absolute or untouchable, and has emphasised the social function of any form of private property. The principle of the common use of goods created for all is the first principle of the whole social-ethical order, it is a natural right, original and overriding. All other rights to the goods necessary for the integral realisation of persons, including that of private property and any others, must therefore not stand in the way, but, on the contrary, facilitate its realisation [...] The right to private property can only be considered as a secondary natural right derived from the principle of the universal destination of created goods, and this has very concrete consequences, which must be reflected in the functioning of society. It frequently happens, however, that secondary rights are placed above primary and original rights, depriving them of practical relevance'.

This right-base is without frontiers, and the same applies to the functioning of church society - neither co-opted nor concealed.

Even more so than private individuals, it is accountable without tricks: it manages goods that are in themselves common, varied, sacred and not exclusive.

Church leaders are the first to overcome the one-sidedness of the role and resources, let alone manage them as if they were selective property or reserved clubs.

Therefore, spiritual leaders must be the first witnesses of this social, humanising and divine function.

They are called upon to dispose of the resources to be 'broken' in a way that is not cheerful and carefree, but with a strong sense of responsibility - without any shadow.

"Renzo gladly embraced this opinion; Lucia approved it; and Agnes, proud of having given it, took the poor beasts out of the room one by one, put their eight legs together as if she were making a bunch of flowers, wrapped them up and tied them with a string, and handed them into Renzo's hand; who, having given and received words of hope, went out into the garden, so as not to be seen by the boys, who ran after him, shouting: the bridegroom! the bridegroom! So, crossing the fields or, as they say there, the places, he went off down the lanes, trembling, thinking over his misfortune, and ruminating over the speech to be made to Doctor Azzecca-garbugli. I leave it to the reader to think how those poor beasts must have been travelling, so tied up and held by the legs, head downwards, in the hand of a man who, agitated by so many passions, accompanied with gestures the thoughts that passed through his mind in turmoil. Now he stretched out his arm in anger, now he raised it in despair, now he thrust it in the air, as if to threaten, and, in every way, he shook them fiercely, and made those four heads jump; which in the meantime were endeavouring to peck at each other, as happens all too often among companions in misfortune" [I Promessi Sposi, ch.3].

To internalise and live the message:

In your community, is the administration of goods public, regular and transparent or the chronic prerogative of individuals and groups without control?