Third Easter Sunday (year A) [19 April 2026] 

*First Reading from the Acts of the Apostles (2:4, 22b–33)

The same Peter who, out of fear, had denied Jesus during his trial and who, after his death, had been holed up with the other disciples in a locked room, we find today, just fifty days later, standing and delivering an impromptu speech before thousands of people; and if Luke notes that he is standing, it is because the posture is symbolic: in a sense, Peter is awakening, coming back to life, rising up. Before going any further, it should be noted that up to this point Peter had not been a model of boldness, and yet it is precisely to him that Jesus now entrusts the boldest of missions: to continue the work of evangelisation, a mission that cost the Son of God himself his life, and the man who not long before had denied the Master will soon rejoice in being persecuted.  This entirely new strength, this boldness, Peter does not draw from himself, but is a gift from God. Let us return to that Pentecost morning in the year of Jesus’ death, when Jerusalem was teeming with people: they were pilgrims who had come from all over for the festival because, just like Peter and the other apostles of Jesus, they shared the hope of Israel, and it is on this hope that Peter relies to proclaim that the long-awaited Messiah has come and that we have had the privilege of knowing him. Peter emphasises in his speech the continuity of God’s work, which for him is a crucial point, and invokes the testimony of Psalm 15/16. His listeners are the least prepared to accept his words precisely because, having always awaited the Messiah, they have had time to form their own ideas about him—human ideas—and God cannot help but surprise our human ideas. One of the most unacceptable aspects of the mystery of Jesus for his contemporaries is his death on the cross: on Good Friday, Jesus, abandoned by all, truly seemed cursed by God himself, and so how could he be the Messiah? On Easter evening, the apostles realised that he was indeed the Messiah because they had witnessed his Resurrection.  Peter concludes by appealing to his listeners, telling them that if they have not been direct witnesses of the Resurrection, the only possible experience is that of seeing and hearing the twelve apostles transformed by the Holy Spirit

*Responsorial Psalm (15/16)

In the verses of Psalm 15/16, which are set before us today, some phrases seem to convey perfect happiness and everything appears so simple. The psalmist declares: ‘Lord, you are my God; I have made you my refuge; I have no good apart from you.’ In other verses, however, one senses the echo of danger, and Israel pleads, asking not to be abandoned to death nor to be allowed to see corruption. Here lies all the joy of Israel when the heart rejoices, the soul is in celebration because the Lord is ‘my portion and my cup, and I have no good apart from you’. Here Israel is likened to a Levite, to a priest who dwells ceaselessly in the temple of God and lives in intimacy with Him. The expression “Lord, my portion and my cup; upon You my lot depends” is an allusion to when the division of the land of Israel among the tribes of Jacob’s descendants was made by lot. At that time, the members of the tribe of Levi had not received a portion of land: their portion was the House of God, that is, service in the Temple, service to God, and their entire lives were consecrated to worship. They therefore had no territory, and their livelihood was secured by tithes and a portion of the harvests and meat offered in sacrifice. This also helps us understand the other verse of this psalm, which we do not hear today, where the psalmist says, ‘My portion makes me glad; I truly have the finest inheritance’. The Levites guarded the Temple day and night, and this is alluded to when the psalm notes, ‘even at night my heart instructs me’. In this psalm, one also senses the echo of danger, and the plea, ‘you cannot abandon me to death, nor let your holy one see corruption’, conveys the often-suffered tribulations of the chosen people.  The opening plea for help, ‘Preserve me, O God, for in you I take refuge’, and the repeated expressions of trust suggest a period when, indeed, trust was hard to come by, and this cry for help is at the same time a profession of faith, for it reflects the struggle against idolatry to remain faithful to the one God. In another verse of the psalm we read that all the idols of the land never cease to spread their harm, and people rush to follow them. This shows that Israel sometimes succumbed to idolatry but made a commitment not to fall back into it, and the statement ‘I have made you, my God, my only refuge’ conveys this resolve. We can then appreciate how eloquent the image of the Levite is, for it is a way of saying that by choosing to remain faithful to the true God, the people of Israel made the true choice that brings them into intimacy with God, and Israel’s trust inspires such striking phrases as ‘eternity of delights’ or ‘you cannot abandon me to death, nor let your friend see corruption’. One might wonder whether, when the psalm was written, there was already, albeit in a confused form, a first glimmer of faith in the Resurrection, even though we know that belief in individual resurrection appeared very late in Israel. Here it seems rather that the focus is on the people whose survival is in danger because of their succumbing to idolatry. But they are convinced that God will not abandon them, and that is why they affirm: ‘You cannot abandon me to death, nor let your friend see corruption’. Around the second century BC, when belief in the resurrection of each of us began to take hold, the phrase ‘you will not abandon me to death, nor let your friend see decay’ was understood in this sense, and later Christians reinterpreted this psalm in their own way, as we heard in the first reading. On the morning of Pentecost, Peter quoted this psalm to the Jewish pilgrims who had come in great numbers to Jerusalem for the feast, to show them that Jesus was truly the Messiah. He recalled that when David composed this psalm, without realising it, he was already announcing the Resurrection of the Messiah. Here we have an example of the first Christian preaching addressed to Jews, that is, how the first apostles reinterpreted Jewish tradition, discovering within it a new dimension: the proclamation of Jesus Christ. Over the centuries, this psalm has carried the prayer of Israel in its expectation of the Messiah, becoming enriched with new meanings; yet it was the first Christian generation that discovered and demonstrated that the Scriptures find their full meaning in Jesus Christ.

*Second Reading from the First Letter of the Apostle Peter (1:17–21)

In the first reading from the Acts of the Apostles, we read Peter’s speech on the morning of Pentecost, a model of the first Christian preaching addressed to Jews. Here, however, in Peter’s letter, we see a sermon addressed to pagans—non-Jews who had become Christians—and it is obvious that the discourse is not the same, for it is the ABC of communication to adapt one’s language to the audience. And even though we do not know exactly to whom the letter is addressed—since in the opening lines Peter merely states that he is writing to the elect living as strangers in the five provinces of present-day Turkey, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, what suggests they were not of Jewish origin is the phrase ‘you have been redeemed from the futile ways inherited from your fathers’. Peter, being Jewish himself, would not say such a thing to Jews, knowing all too well what hope runs through the Scriptures and how the whole life of his people is directed towards God. What strikes the eye in this simple passage is the striking number of allusions to the Bible, with expressions such as the blood of the Lamb without blemish or spot, the Father who judges impartially, and the fear of God; and if Peter uses them without explaining them, it is because his audience is familiar with them. But this is only possible if they are non-Jews. The most likely hypothesis is that many sympathisers gathered around the synagogues, and among them a significant number of those called ‘God-fearing’, who were so close to Judaism that they observed the Sabbath; they listened to all the synagogue readings on Saturday mornings, and consequently knew the Hebrew Scriptures well but had never gone so far as to ask for circumcision. It is thought that the early Christians were recruited mainly from among them, and it is worth returning to two expressions in Peter’s letter that may strike us as odd if we do not place them in their biblical context.  First of all, the expression ‘fear of God’ has a particular meaning precisely because God revealed himself to his people as Father. The fear of God, therefore, is not fear but a filial attitude made up of tenderness, respect, veneration and total trust, and Peter says that since you call upon God as your Father, you live in the fear of God by behaving as children. If you call upon as Father the One who judges everyone impartially according to their deeds, you therefore live in the fear of God. From Peter’s emphasis on the One who judges everyone impartially according to their deeds, we can surmise that some of these new Christians, coming from paganism, felt inferior to Christians of Jewish origin, and Peter therefore wishes to reassure them by saying, in essence: you are children just like the others; simply behave as children. The second phrase that might cause offence is: ‘you have been redeemed by the precious blood of Christ’. The risk is of seeing this as a horrendous bartering, without being able to say clearly between whom and whom. But reading Peter’s sentence in full – “not with perishable things such as silver or gold were you redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your forefathers, but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect” – two things become clear: firstly, this is not a matter of bartering; our liberation is free, and Peter takes care to say ‘not with gold or silver’, a way of saying it is free. Secondly, Peter does not place the emphasis where we do, because the blood of a lamb without blemish or defect is the blood that was shed every year at Passover and which marked Israel’s liberation from all forms of slavery.  This blood that was shed heralded God’s ongoing work to free his people and, for a reader familiar with the Old Testament, is a reference to the feast of freedom—a freedom on the journey towards the Promised Land. But now, Peter notes, definitive liberation has been accomplished in Jesus Christ. We have now entered   a new life better than the Promised Land, and this liberation consists precisely in calling upon God as Father. We can then better understand  the phrase: you have been redeemed, that is, freed from the superficial way of life inherited from your fathers; ‘superficial’ here means that it leads nowhere, as opposed to eternal life. Since the Son lived as a man in trust until the end, it is all of humanity that has rediscovered the path of a filial attitude. Ultimately, it is a matter of having rediscovered the path to the tree of life, to use the image from Genesis. Paul would say: you have passed from the slave’s attitude of fear and mistrust to the filial reverence proper to children.

*From the Gospel according to Luke (24:13–35)

Note the parallel between these two phrases: their eyes were prevented from recognising him, and then their eyes were opened; this means that the two disciples of Emmaus passed from the deepest discouragement to enthusiasm simply because their eyes were opened. Why were they opened? Because Jesus explained the Scriptures to them, and beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted in all the Scriptures what concerned him. This means that Jesus Christ is at the centre of God’s plan revealed in Scripture. The Old Testament must not, however, be reduced to a mere backdrop for the New, because to read the prophets as if they were announcing only the historical coming of Jesus Christ is to betray the Old Testament and strip it of all its historical depth, given that the Old Testament is the testimony of God’s long-suffering patience in revealing himself to his people and enabling them to live in his Covenant. The words of the prophets, for example, apply first and foremost to the era in which they were spoken, and we must not forget that reading Jesus Christ as the centre of human history and therefore also of Scripture is a Christian interpretation. The Jews have a different one, and we Jews and Christians agree in invoking God the Father of all mankind and in reading in the Old Testament the long wait for the Messiah, but let us not forget that recognising Jesus as the Messiah is not self-evident; it becomes so for those whose eyes are somehow opened and whose hearts consequently burn within them, just as those of the disciples of Emmaus did. It would be wonderful to know all the biblical texts that Jesus went through with the two disciples of Emmaus. We do know, however, that at the end of this biblical journey Jesus concludes by asking: ‘Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and enter into his glory?’ This phrase presents a real difficulty for us because it lends itself to two possible interpretations. The first possible interpretation is “it was necessary for the Christ to suffer in order to deserve to enter into his glory”, as if there were a requirement on the part of the Father; but this interpretation betrays the Scriptures because it presents Jesus’ relationship with the Father in terms of merit, which is not at all in keeping with the Old Testament revelation that Jesus developed. God is nothing but Love, Gift and Forgiveness, and with Him it is not a matter of balance, merit, arithmetic or calculation. It is also true that the New Testament often speaks of the fulfilment of the Scriptures, but not in this sense. There is, however, a second way of reading this phrase: ‘it was necessary for the Christ to suffer in order to enter into his glory’: the glory of God is his presence manifested to us. Now we know that God is Love. One could rephrase the sentence thus: ‘it was necessary for the Christ to suffer’ so that God’s love might be manifested and revealed. Jesus himself gave a foreshadowing of his death when he said to his disciples, ‘There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for those one loves’. It was therefore necessary for love to go that far, to the point of facing hatred, abandonment and death, so that we might discover that God’s love is the greatest love, so that we might discover how far God’s love goes—so far beyond our own way of loving and so unimaginable in the true sense of the word. It was necessary for it to be revealed to us, and for it to be revealed, it had to go that far. “It was necessary” does not therefore mean a requirement on God’s part, but a necessity for us; and to say that the events of Jesus’ life fulfil the Scriptures is to say that his entire life is a revelation in action of this love of the Father, whatever the circumstances, including persecution, hatred, condemnation and death. The Resurrection of Jesus authenticates this revelation: this love is stronger than death.

+Giovanni D’Ercole

Thoughts on food

Several things prompted me to reflect on this.

One was a film broadcast by Rai 1 on 2 April 2026 (Maundy Thursday) on the subject of eating disorders. The film was called “Something Lilac.”

It is the story of a teenager who struggles with eating disorders, although the film focuses mainly on bulimia. The main eating disorders are anorexia and bulimia.

Another inspiration was seeing someone again at the centre who had suffered from these problems in the past and whom I had supported psychologically.

Finally, about a month ago, a lady I had known for years and who had long been troubled by these issues passed away. She wouldn’t listen to anyone; she ‘wasted away to the bone’.

And so, as with all my short articles, I ‘dredged up’ the theoretical knowledge I’d acquired over the years, combined with my observations of cases at work.

The issue of food is important for all living beings. If we do not eat, we do not live.

But here too, as in all situations in life, striking the right balance is not always easy.

The ideal approach is to eat without excesses that could cause metabolic disorders, and in such a way that our body functions well.

Sometimes, for various reasons, human beings alter their relationship with food. Think of the periods when people suffered from food shortages due to wars, epidemics, or other causes.

Cases of self-imposed fasting are also described in the Bible, but it was around 1600 that cases of significant weight loss due to diet began to be observed.

In contrast to the time of the ancient Romans, when they would indulge in huge feasts followed by self-induced vomiting – if I recall correctly, they would tickle their palates with a feather to induce vomiting and then start eating again.

The history of eating disorders is not a modern phenomenon, but has its roots in distant times.

In the Middle Ages, fasting was often associated with demonic possession, or conversely with mystical behaviour.

‘Mystics’ would fast to purify the body, draw as close as possible to God, and sometimes to withdraw from earthly life. Unlike the disorder seen today, the motivation was not beauty, but the aspiration to holiness.

Nowadays, distorted relationships with food are recognised as complex disorders, influenced by cultural and psychological factors.                                  

These are serious disorders, often interlinked, and requiring treatment by various specialists.  In short, anorexia involves a profound fear of gaining weight, stemming from a distorted perception of one’s own body.

Bulimia involves overeating followed by vomiting or self-induced purging – to prevent weight gain.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Such issues are more prevalent in industrialised cultures, where there is a higher standard of living and the idea of being attractive is associated with thinness.

Through the media, the idea of physical perfection has also reached less developed cultures, fostering a desire for physical attractiveness; which would not be a bad thing, were it not for the harm it causes to the body.

Nor should we overlook the influence of cultural role models; such as extremely thin models who trigger a desire to be like them – sometimes at any cost.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             And here I recall that years ago, there was a proposal to make figures such as the Barbie doll ‘put on weight’, to correct the image she unconsciously conveyed. 

Until recently, it was mostly young people and women who were affected by such eating disorders. Lately, however, the issue has also come to affect men.

In my professional practice, I have encountered such issues. I have carried out various psychodiagnostic assessments where the main problems were eating disorders, even in very young individuals. 

These were mostly female subjects, but I have also encountered a few male adolescents.

In psychotherapeutic treatment, working alongside other professionals, I have dealt with a few cases of anorexia in young girls, whilst the few cases of bulimia I have encountered were in older women.

This is in line with the theoretical principles that situate anorexia in early adolescence and bulimia in late adolescence or early adulthood.

I recall that the thin girls were always restless, worried and tormented, whilst the more ‘full-figured’ women were cheerful, sometimes even friendly. One of them was even able to joke about her considerable weight. 

The progression of these conditions can vary; some are severe and can compromise general health – and there is a risk of mortality. 

People with anorexia generally tend to be somewhat more stubborn; they may refuse not only food but also new experiences, and adopt a closed-off attitude; people with bulimia mainly exhibit ‘emotional volatility’, moments of anger and emptiness that they unconsciously try to fill with food.

Emotionally, these people may feel anxious, may be impulsive, and may experience shame. Anorexics are ashamed of their bodies, which they always perceive as enormous; bulimics are distressed by their lack of control, which sometimes extends beyond eating habits.

The characteristics of these issues are kept hidden for a long time. In doing so, they make it difficult to form a genuine relationship with others, with sufferers usually appearing more immature and superficial.

These people are united  in an exaggerated way by a hunger for care and affection. They have an immense fear of being abandoned, and that other people might stop loving them.

But it is a question of  ‘how strong this feeling is’, because everyone  wants to be loved; they want to have a healthy relationship based on trust and mutual respect.

Intellectually, those with eating disorders may exhibit rigid thinking and a distorted perception of their body’s condition; in less severe cases, there remains a dissatisfaction with their physical appearance or certain parts of it.

In more severe cases, body image and how it is experienced often impairs their ability to assess reality.

Dr Francesco Giovannozzi  Psychologist – Psychotherapist

(Jn 6:22-29)

Not a few seek Jesus not for the amazement of the Person and his Way, but because He guarantees more satiety than others (v.26).

Then we must get out of the superficiality of short thoughts. To the Master, the "correct" relationship already seems a "finished" Love.

Christ's proposal points to other goals; it is not matched by momentary enthusiasm for a sensational event, nor by quiet selfishness.

In the Sign that nourishes the new Way [the Exodus of «little boats» (vv.22-24) that follow Christ] lies a Vocation and a Mission.

Beyond where one assumes.

A Mysticism of the donated Seed opens up the meaning of personal existence - to finally set us off  without guardians (v.22).

The «Son of man» is the person endowed with full humanity, depicting man in the divine condition.

He is always surprisingly on the other side (v.25) to make himself that "I do not know what": ‘Perfume’ of the outgoing Church.

Eros-beyond, which overcomes attachments, habits, consolidated equilibriums.

The Lord does not identify spiritual well-being with the extinguishing of the soul’s flame, in the manias even of activism.

Therefore, the required Work is not at all about fulfilling the many prescriptions.

It does not resemble the usual staging, set-up and composition works [the «doing»: v.28], for it is rather singular Action of God [Subject] in us.

Observances must be tediously piled on top of each other.

The divine Initiative that is accomplished in our every gesture is instead a precious Virtue, an unexpected Energy.

A new opportunity to meet ourselves, our brothers, another shore - and to detach ourselves from exteriority.

Jesus reveals himself in the sign of the breaking of Bread.

«Food that endures for the Life of the Eternal» (v. 27), that is, that flows into an experience that already here and now possesses the indestructible quality of God's own intimacy.

In order to receive the well-chopped Food that sustains and becomes a source of complete life in us, the "work" to be done does not belong to the kind that we can ‘prepare’ - not even according to law and devotions.

It can only be a response to the work that the Father himself carries out within each of us; even if it does not immediately appear brilliant and finalized.

And here is the reversal guaranteed by the adventure of Faith:

Religious submission is swept away by Acceptance, which has a far less mortifying (and reductionist) sense; conversely, respectful of attempts. And creative.

The relationship with God changes.

It becomes one of pure welcoming; yet inventive, by Name: unrepeatable and personal.

No more of passive renunciation, reproach, purification, obedience [“yes-sir” appearances].

The founding Eros does not scold us: it is solely Gift. For a healthy Reciprocity, respectful of our character and ascendant.

In this way, the Attraction will not be extinguished. It wants its peaks every day; it is not enough for it to become normal symbiosis, then habit.

Rather, it dreams of a broad Path.

The rest unfortunately remains ineffective or ambiguous sequels; leading the soul always at war with itself and others.

Binary that here and there can only manifest blind, one-sided, forced caricatures of the Eternal’s Image - despite the claims of excellence.

Mechanisms that hurt.

[Monday 3rd wk. in Easter, April 20, 2026]

(Jn 6:22-29)

The crowd must be directed, because in the face of the "sign of the loaves" the reaction seems disappointing. Sensationalism that directs towards an earthly kingdom is not worthwhile (v.15).

Not a few seek Jesus not for the wonder of the Person and his Way, but because he guarantees more satiety than others (v.26).

Then one must get out of the superficiality of short thoughts. To the Master, the "correct" relationship already seems a "finished" love.

Christ's proposal points to other destinations; it does not go together with momentary enthusiasm for a sensational event, nor with quiet selfishness.

In the Sign that nourishes the new Way [the Exodus of "little boats" (vv.22-24) that follow the Christ] lies a Vocation and a Mission. Beyond where one assumes.

A Mysticism of the Seed given to finally set us off without guardians (v.22) opens up the meaning of personal existence.

Otherwise, the struggle for 'bread' does not reach the Source, nor the roots of being and relationship. Nor does it expand the horizon of total living.

In the wilderness, Moses had ensured sustenance for the people: admittedly, a feeble sustenance, always identical to the point of boredom - but reassuring. 

Like ancient religion: good for all seasons; that is also good on the surface.

The 'Son of Man' is the person endowed with full humanity, depicting man in the divine condition.

He does not repeat the past: he is always surprisingly on the other side (v.25) to make himself that "I don't know what": 'perfume' of the outgoing Church.

Eros beyond, which overcomes attachments, habit, established balances.

In short, Christ does not want passive friends, those who do not want the discomfort of listening and dialogue; who shun suffering, affronts, or the consequences of new initiatives.

The Lord does not equate spiritual well-being with the extinguishing (toxic) of the flame of the soul that does not measure itself, that does not like questioning, and comparisons.

In our journey, the very apprehension of situations that worry and manifest vulnerabilities are precious intimate signals.

The same applies to failures, which force us to rework the 'no events', look inside, shift our gaze.

Assemblies of Faith' are the Fraternities that in the unfolding of relationships, horizons and even insecurities do not leave us conditioned and 'regulated', shaped by epidermic gazes, by others.

Peers who do not keep food and treasures for themselves, experiencing together a special aptitude for appreciation and wholeness - without secret, hysterical, lacerating dissociations.

The Work required is not at all about the fulfilments of the law, the pile of 'works', or the fulfilment of the many prescriptions... to 'merit'.

It does not resemble the usual set-up work [the "doing": v.28], for it is rather singular Action of God [Subject] in us.

Observances must be tediously piled on top of one another. Instead, the divine Work that is accomplished in our every gesture is precious Virtue.

Unexpected energy; a new opportunity to meet ourselves, our brothers, another shore - and to detach ourselves from externality.

Jesus self-reveals himself in the sign of the breaking of the Bread, "food that endures for the Life of the Eternal One" (v.27), that is, that results in an experience that already here and now possesses the indestructible quality of God's own intimacy.

In order to receive the well-diminished Food that sustains and becomes in us the source of complete life, the "work" to be done does not belong to the kind of work that we can do - not even according to law and devotion.

It can only be a response to the work that the Father Himself performs within each of us, even if it does not immediately appear brilliant and purposeful.

And here is the reversal guaranteed by the adventure of Faith:

Religious submission is undermined by acceptance, which has a far less mortifying (or reductionist) sense; on the contrary, respectful of attempts, and creative.

It does not merely present a kind of elitist and normalised depersonalisation: e.g. 'eyes open', pleasures not to be experienced, 'bills to be paid'; and so on.

The relationship with God changes.

It becomes purely 'welcoming'. Yet inventive, by Name: unrepeatable and personal.

No longer passive renunciation, rebuke, purification, obedience [lordly appearances].

Foundational Eros does not scold us: it is uniquely Gift.

But only His work is reliable, albeit whimsical, unaligned, changeable, totally unpredictable.

And Us? Spontaneous, transparent, unbothered correspondence; not covered by tame activism.

Only thus will the 'giving in' not somatise into acts of protest. For a healthy Reciprocity, respectful of our character and ascendant.

Thus the attraction will not fade. It wants its peaks every day; it is not enough for it to turn into a normal symbiosis, then a habit.

Rather, dream of a broad Path; in depth. Of regeneration and similarity - involving and projecting, but not absorbing.The rest unfortunately remains ineffective or ambiguous sequelae; leading the soul always at war with itself and others.

Binary that here and there can only manifest blind, one-sided, forced caricatures of His Image - despite the pretensions of excellence.

Mechanisms that hurt.

To internalise and live the message:

How do you discern the qualitative difference between Works of Law and Works of Faith?

Food of the Eternal and Faith [by Teresa Girolami].

In today's passage, after the multiplication of the loaves, the crowd chases Jesus to the other shore, towards Capernaum.

And immediately the Lord puts his finger on the sore spot by emphasising that people seek Him not because of the signs seen, but because they are satiated.

A quest driven not by faith, but perhaps by need.

And, to those who ask what to fulfil in order to do the works of God, the Lord urges the work par excellence: believing.

Jesus dismounts and shifts his gaze from the law to Faith.

Wonderful context that in the time of Francis and Clare induced the poor people of Assisi to evolve their path of trust and abandonment in God.

In the extraordinary Franciscan Sources we find Francis himself called by the Lord to a leap of faith.

"The Saint found great consolation in the Lord's visits and was assured by them that the foundations of his Order would always remain stable [...].

Being troubled by bad examples, and having resorted one day, so bitterly, to prayer, he felt himself addressed in this way by the Lord:

"Why are you, little man, troubled? Perhaps I made you pastor of my Order in such a way that you would forget that I remain its principal patron?

That is why I have chosen you, simple man, so that those who will, may follow the works that I will do in you and that must be imitated by all others.

I have called you: I will preserve and shepherd you, I will make up with new religious the void left by the others, to the point of giving birth to them if they were not already born.

'Do not therefore be troubled, but wait for your salvation, for if the Order should be reduced even to only three brothers, my help will always be stable'.

From that day it was customary to say that the virtue of a single holy friar overcomes a quantity, however great, of imperfects, as a single ray of light dispels the thickest darkness" (FF 742).

To him who believes in Him who makes us righteous, it is his faith that is reckoned to him for righteousness (cf. Rom 4:4-5).

S. Clare, then, lived literally what Jesus suggests in this Gospel passage: be concerned about food that lasts forever.

In fact, Pope Gregory, with the Bull "Quo elongati" [Up to what point] of 28 September 1230, forbade the Friars Minor from entering monasteries without a special licence from the Holy See - and that only those brothers deputed to do so could take care of the Poor Clares.

In this context, here is what the Sources attest:

"Once, when the Lord Pope Gregory had forbidden any monk to go to the monasteries of the Women without his permission, the pious Mother regretted that the sisters would more rarely have the food of sacred doctrine and groaning said:

"Take them all away from us now, the brothers, after you have taken away those who gave us the nourishment of life!"

And she immediately sent all the brothers back to the minister, not wanting to have beggars to provide the material bread, when they no longer had those who provided them with the bread of the spirit.

But when Pope Gregory learned of this, he immediately put the prohibition back into the power of the general minister" (FF 3232).

Solicitude of a soul in love with the eternal food and willing to renounce everything for It.

"Work not for the food that perishes, but for the food that remains for the life of the LORD [...]" (Jn 6:27).

"This is the Work of God: that you believe in him whom he has sent" (Jn 6:29).

[Teresa Girolami].

Opening the horizon

We are in the synagogue of Capernaum where Jesus is giving his well-known discourse after the multiplication of the loaves. People had tried to make him king, but Jesus had withdrawn, first to the mountain with God, with the Father, and then to Capernaum. Not seeing him, she had set out to look for him, had boarded the boats to reach the other side of the lake and had finally found him. But Jesus knew well the reason for so much enthusiasm in following him and he also says it clearly: you "seek me not because you have seen signs [because your heart has been moved], but because you have eaten of those loaves and been satisfied" (v. 26). Jesus wants to help people go beyond the immediate satisfaction of their material needs, important though they are. He wants to open up to a horizon of existence that is not simply that of the daily concerns of eating, dressing, a career. Jesus speaks of a food that does not perish, that it is important to seek and receive. He says: "Give yourselves not for the food that does not last, but for the food that remains for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you" (v. 27).The crowd does not understand, they believe that Jesus is asking for the observance of precepts in order to obtain the continuation of that miracle, and they ask: "What must we do to do the works of God?" (v. 28). Jesus' response is clear: "This is the work of God: that you believe in him whom he has sent" (v. 29). The centre of existence, what gives meaning and firm hope to the often difficult journey of life is faith in Jesus, the encounter with Christ. We too ask, "what must we do to have eternal life?" And Jesus says: "believe in me". Faith is the fundamental thing. It is not a question here of following an idea, a project, but of encountering Jesus as a living Person, of letting oneself be totally involved by Him and His Gospel. Jesus invites us not to stop at the purely human horizon and to open up to the horizon of God, the horizon of faith. He demands only one thing: to accept God's plan, that is, "to believe in him whom he has sent" (v. 29). Moses had given Israel the manna, the bread from heaven, with which God himself had fed his people. Jesus does not give something, He gives Himself: He is the 'true bread, come down from heaven', He, the living Word of the Father; in the encounter with Him we encounter the living God.

"What must we do to do the works of God?" (v. 28) asks the crowd, ready to act, so that the miracle of the bread may continue. But Jesus, the true bread of life that satiates our hunger for meaning, for truth, cannot be "earned" by human labour; he comes to us only as a gift of God's love, as God's work to be asked for and accepted.

Dear friends, in the days laden with occupation and problems, but also in those of rest and relaxation, the Lord invites us not to forget that if it is necessary to worry about material bread and replenish our strength, it is even more fundamental to grow in our relationship with Him, to strengthen our faith in Him who is the "bread of life", who fills our desire for truth and love.

[Pope Benedict, Angelus 5 August 2012].

Verb "Believe", noun "Faith

1. The first and fundamental point of reference of this catechesis are the universally known professions of the Christian faith. They are also called "symbols of faith". The Greek word 'symbolon' meant the half of a broken object (e.g. of a seal) that was presented as the sign of recognition. The broken parts were put together to verify the identity of the bearer. Hence the further meanings of the 'symbol': proof of identity, letters of credence and even a treaty or contract of which the 'symbolon' was the proof. The transition from this meaning to that of a collection or summary of the things referred to and documented was quite natural. In our case 'symbols' mean the collection of the main truths of faith, i.e. what the Church believes in. Systematic catechesis contains instructions on what the Church believes in, i.e. the contents of the Christian faith. Hence also the fact that 'symbols of faith' are the first and fundamental point of reference for catechesis.

2. Among the various ancient 'symbols of faith', the most authoritative is the 'apostolic symbol', of very ancient origin and commonly recited in the 'prayers of the Christian'. It contains the main truths of the faith transmitted by the apostles of Jesus Christ. Another famous ancient symbol is the 'Nicene-Constantinopolitan' symbol: it contains the same truths of the apostolic faith authoritatively elucidated in the first two ecumenical councils of the universal Church: Nicaea (325) and Constantinople (381). The custom of the 'symbols of faith' proclaimed as the fruit of the Church's Councils has also been renewed in our century: in fact, after the Second Vatican Council, Pope Paul VI pronounced the 'profession of faith' known as the Creed of the People of God (1968), which contains the entirety of the truths of the Church's faith with special consideration of those contents to which the last Council had given expression, or those points around which doubts had been raised in recent years.

The symbols of faith are the main point of reference for the present catechesis. They, however, refer to the whole of the 'deposit of the word of God', constituted by Holy Scripture and the apostolic tradition, being only a concise synthesis of it. Through the professions of faith, therefore, we too aim to go back to that immutable "deposit", on the basis of the interpretation that the Church, assisted by the Spirit, has given it over the centuries.

3. Each of the aforementioned 'symbols' begins with the word 'creed'. Each of them in fact serves not so much as instruction but as profession. The contents of this profession are the truths of the Christian faith: all are rooted in this first word 'I believe'. And it is precisely on this expression 'I believe' that we wish to focus in this first catechesis.The expression is present in everyday language, even independently of any religious content, and especially of Christian content. 'I believe you' means: I trust you, I am convinced that you speak the truth. "I believe in what you say" means: I am convinced that the content of your words corresponds to objective reality.

In this common use of the word 'I believe', certain essential elements are emphasised. "To believe" means to accept and recognise as true and corresponding to reality the content of what is said, i.e. the words of another person (or even of several persons), because of his (or their) credibility. This credibility decides in a given case the particular authority of the person: the authority of truth. Thus by saying 'I believe', we are simultaneously expressing a twofold reference: to the person and to the truth; to the truth, in view of the person who enjoys particular credibility.

4. The word 'I believe' appears very often in the pages of the Gospel and throughout Holy Scripture. It would be very useful to compare and analyse all the points in the Old and New Testaments that enable us to grasp the biblical meaning of 'believing'. Alongside the verb 'to believe' we also find the noun 'faith' as one of the central expressions throughout the Bible. We even find a certain type of "definitions" of faith, such as for example: "faith is the foundation of things hoped for and proof of things not seen" from the Letter to the Hebrews (Heb 11:1).

These biblical data have been studied, explained, developed by the Fathers and theologians over two thousand years of Christianity, as the enormous exegetical and dogmatic literature we have at our disposal attests. As in 'symbols', so in all theology, 'believing', 'faith' is a fundamental category. It is also the starting point of catechesis, as the first act with which we respond to God's revelation.

5. In the present discussion we will limit ourselves to just one source, which however sums up all the others. It is the conciliar constitution Dei Verbum of Vatican II. We read the following: "It pleased God in his goodness and wisdom to reveal himself and to manifest the mystery of his will (cf. Eph 1:9), through which men, through Christ, the Word made flesh in the Holy Spirit, have access to the Father and are made sharers in the divine nature . . . (cf. Eph 2:18; 2 Pet 1:4)" (Dei Verbum, 2).

"To the God who reveals is due the obedience of faith (cf. Rom 16:26; 1:5; 2 Cor 10:5-6), by which man freely surrenders himself to God in his entirety, lending him 'the full obedience of intellect and will' (Vatican Council I, Dei Filius, 3) and voluntarily consenting to the revelation given by him" (Dei Verbum, 5).

In these words of the conciliar document is contained the answer to the question: what does it mean to "believe". The explanation is concise, but condenses a great wealth of content. We will have to penetrate more extensively into this explanation of the Council later on, which has a scope equivalent to that of a technical definition, so to speak.

One thing is first of all obvious: there is a genetic and organic link between our Christian 'creed' and that particular 'initiative' of God himself, which is called 'revelation'.

Therefore, catechesis on the 'creed' (faith) must be carried out together with catechesis on divine revelation. Logically and historically, revelation precedes faith. Faith is conditioned by revelation. It is man's response to divine revelation.

Let us say right now that it is possible and right to give this answer, because God is credible. No one is like him. No one possesses the authority of truth like it. In no case is the conceptual and semantic value of the word so usual in human language: 'I believe', 'I believe you', realised as in faith in God.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 13 March 1985].

Faith in Christ

1. Looking at the primary objective of the Jubilee, which is "the reinvigoration of the faith and witness of Christians" (Tertio millennio adveniente, 42), after having outlined in the previous catecheses the fundamental traits of the salvation offered by Christ, we pause today to reflect on the faith that he expects from us.

To God who reveals himself - teaches Dei Verbum - is due "the obedience of faith" (n. 5). God revealed himself in the Old Covenant, demanding from his chosen people a fundamental adherence of faith. In the fullness of time, this faith is called to be renewed and developed in response to the revelation of the incarnate Son of God. Jesus expressly requests it, addressing his disciples at the Last Supper: "You have faith in God; have faith also in me" (Jn 14:1).

2. Jesus had already asked the group of twelve Apostles for a profession of faith in his person. At Caesarea Philippi, after questioning the disciples about the opinions expressed by the people concerning his identity, he asks: "Who do you say that I am?" (Mt 16:15). The answer comes from Simon: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (16:16).

Immediately Jesus confirms the value of this profession of faith, emphasising that it does not proceed simply from a human thought, but from a heavenly inspiration: "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for neither flesh nor blood has revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven" (Mt 16:17). These expressions of a strong Semitic colour designate the total, absolute and supreme revelation: that which refers to the person of Christ the Son of God.

The profession of faith made by Peter will remain the definitive expression of Christ's identity. Mark takes up the terms to introduce his Gospel (cf. Mk 1:1), John refers to it at the conclusion of his, stating that he wrote it so that people might believe "that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God", and so that, believing, they might have life in his name (cf. Jn 20:31).

3. In what does faith consist? The Constitution Dei Verbum explains that with it "man freely surrenders himself to God in his entirety, lending him 'the full obedience of intellect and will' and voluntarily consenting to the revelation given by Him" (n. 5). Faith is, therefore, not only adherence of the intellect to revealed truth, but also obedience of the will and self-giving to God who reveals himself. It is an attitude that commits one's entire existence.

The Council goes on to recall that faith requires "the grace of God, which anticipates and assists, and the interior help of the Holy Spirit, who moves the heart and turns it to God, opens the eyes of the mind, and gives everyone gentleness in consenting to and believing the truth" (ibid.). One can see how faith, on the one hand, makes one accept the truth contained in Revelation and proposed by the Magisterium of those who, as Pastors of the People of God, have received a "certain charism of truth" (Dei Verbum, 8). On the other hand, faith also urges true and profound consistency, which must be expressed in all aspects of a life modelled on that of Christ.

4. Fruit as it is of grace, faith exerts an influence on events. This is admirably seen in the exemplary case of the Blessed Virgin. At the Annunciation, her adherence of faith to the angel's message is decisive for the very coming of Jesus into the world. Mary is the Mother of Christ because she first believed in Him.

At the wedding feast of Cana, Mary by her faith obtains the miracle. Faced with a response from Jesus that seemed less than favourable, she maintained a confident attitude, thus becoming a model of the bold and constant faith that overcomes obstacles.

Bold and insistent was also the faith of the Canaanite woman. To this woman, who had come to ask for the healing of her daughter, Jesus had opposed the Father's plan, which limited his mission to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The Canaanite woman responded with all the strength of her faith and obtained the miracle: 'Woman, truly great is your faith! May it be done to you as you wish" (Mt 15:28).

5. In many other instances, the Gospel testifies to the power of faith. Jesus expresses his admiration for the centurion's faith: 'Truly I tell you, in Israel I have found no one with such great faith' (Mt 8:10). And to Bartimaeus he says: "Go, your faith has saved you" (Mk 10:52). He repeats the same thing to the haemorrhagic woman (cf. Mk 5:34).

The words addressed to the father of the epileptic, who desired the healing of his son, are no less impressive: 'All things are possible for him who believes' (Mk 9:23).

The role of faith is to cooperate with this omnipotence. Jesus demands such cooperation to the extent that, on his return to Nazareth, he performs almost no miracles for the reason that the inhabitants of his village did not believe in him (cf. Mk 6:5-6). For the purpose of salvation, faith has a decisive importance for Jesus.

St Paul will develop Christ's teaching when, in contrast to those who wanted to base the hope of salvation on the observance of the Jewish law, he forcefully affirms that faith in Christ is the only source of salvation: "For we hold that man is justified by faith, regardless of the works of the law" (Rom 3:28). We must not, however, forget that St Paul was thinking of that authentic and full faith "which works through charity" (Gal 5:6). True faith is animated by love of God, which is inseparable from love of one's brothers and sisters.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 18 March 1998].

We are in the synagogue of Capharnaum where Jesus was giving his well-known discourse after the multiplication of the loaves. The people had sought to make him king but Jesus had withdrawn, first, to the mountain with God, with the Father, and then to Capharnaum. Since they could not see him, they began to look for him, they boarded the boats in order to cross the lake to the other shore and had found him at last. However, Jesus was well aware of the reason for this great enthusiasm in following him and he says so, even clearly: “you seek me, not because you saw signs, [because you were deeply impressed] but because you ate your fill of the loaves” (v. 26). 

Jesus wants to help the people go beyond the immediate satisfaction — albeit important — of their own material needs. He wants to open them to a horizon of existence that does not consist merely of the daily concerns of eating, of being clothed, of a career. Jesus speaks of a food that does not perish, which it is important to seek and to receive. He says: “do not labour for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life, which the Son of man will give to you” (v. 27). 

The crowd does not understand, it believes that Jesus is asking for the observance of precepts in order to obtain the continuation of that miracle, and asks: “what must we do, to be dong the works of God?” (v. 28). Jesus’ answer is unequivocal: “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent” (v. 29). The centre of existence — which is what gives meaning and certain hope in the all too often difficult journey of life — is faith in Jesus, it is the encounter with Christ. 

We too ask: “what must we do to have eternal life?”. And Jesus says: “believe in me”. Faith is the fundamental thing. It is not a matter here of following an idea or a project, but of encountering Jesus as a living Person, of letting ourselves be totally involved by him and by his Gospel. Jesus invites us not to stop at the purely human horizon and to open ourselves to the horizon of God, to the horizon of faith. He demands a single act: to accept God’s plan, namely, to “believe in him whom he has sent” (v. 29).

Moses had given Israel manna, the bread from heaven with which God himself had nourished his people. Jesus does not give some thing, he gives himself: he is the “true bread that which comes down from heaven”. He is the living Word of the Father; in the encounter with him we meet the living God. 

“What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” (v. 28), the crowd asks, ready to act in order to perpetuate the miracle of the loaves. But Jesus, the true bread of life that satisfies our hunger for meaning and for truth, cannot be “earned” with human work; he comes to us only as a gift of God’s love, as a work of God to be asked for and received. 

Dear friends, on days that are busy and full of problems, but also on days of rest and relaxation, the Lord asks us not to forget that if it is necessary to be concerned about material bread and to replenish our strength, it is even more fundamental to develop our relationship with him, to reinforce our faith in the One who is the “bread of life” which satisfies our desire for truth and love.

[Pope Benedict, Angelus 5 August 2012]

1. The first and fundamental point of reference of the present catechesis are the universally known professions of the Christian faith. They are also called 'symbols of faith'. The Greek word 'symbolon' meant the half of a broken object (e.g. of a seal) that was presented as the sign of recognition. The broken parts were put together to verify the identity of the bearer. Hence the further meanings of the 'symbol': proof of identity, letters of credence and even a treaty or contract of which the 'symbolon' was the proof. The transition from this meaning to that of a collection or summary of the things referred to and documented was quite natural. In our case 'symbols' mean the collection of the main truths of faith, i.e. what the Church believes in. Systematic catechesis contains instructions on what the Church believes in, i.e. the contents of the Christian faith. Hence also the fact that 'symbols of faith' are the first and fundamental point of reference for catechesis.

2. Among the various ancient 'symbols of faith', the most authoritative is the 'apostolic symbol', of very ancient origin and commonly recited in the 'prayers of the Christian'. It contains the main truths of the faith transmitted by the apostles of Jesus Christ. Another famous ancient symbol is the 'Nicene-Constantinopolitan' symbol: it contains the same truths of the apostolic faith authoritatively elucidated in the first two ecumenical councils of the universal Church: Nicaea (325) and Constantinople (381). The custom of the 'symbols of faith' proclaimed as the fruit of the Church's Councils has also been renewed in our century: in fact, after the Second Vatican Council, Pope Paul VI pronounced the 'profession of faith' known as the Creed of the People of God (1968), which contains the entirety of the truths of the Church's faith with special consideration of those contents to which the last Council had given expression, or those points around which doubts had been raised in recent years.

The symbols of faith are the main point of reference for the present catechesis. They, however, refer to the whole of the 'deposit of the word of God', constituted by Holy Scripture and the apostolic tradition, being only a concise synthesis of it. Through the professions of faith, therefore, we too aim to go back to that immutable "deposit", on the basis of the interpretation that the Church, assisted by the Spirit, has given it over the centuries.

3. Each of the aforementioned 'symbols' begins with the word 'creed'. Each of them in fact serves not so much as instruction but as profession. The contents of this profession are the truths of the Christian faith: all are rooted in this first word 'I believe'. And it is precisely on this expression 'I believe' that we wish to focus in this first catechesis.

The expression is present in everyday language, even independently of any religious content, and especially of Christian content. 'I believe you' means: I trust you, I am convinced that you speak the truth. "I believe in what you say" means: I am convinced that the content of your words corresponds to objective reality.

In this common use of the word 'I believe', certain essential elements are emphasised. "To believe" means to accept and recognise as true and corresponding to reality the content of what is said, i.e. the words of another person (or even of several persons), because of his (or their) credibility. This credibility decides in a given case the particular authority of the person: the authority of truth. Thus by saying 'I believe', we are simultaneously expressing a twofold reference: to the person and to the truth; to the truth, in view of the person who enjoys particular credibility.

4. The word 'I believe' appears very often in the pages of the Gospel and throughout Holy Scripture. It would be very useful to compare and analyse all the points in the Old and New Testaments that enable us to grasp the biblical meaning of 'believing'. Alongside the verb 'to believe' we also find the noun 'faith' as one of the central expressions throughout the Bible. We even find a certain type of "definitions" of faith, such as for example: "faith is the foundation of things hoped for and proof of things not seen" from the Letter to the Hebrews (Heb 11:1).

These biblical data have been studied, explained, developed by the Fathers and theologians over two thousand years of Christianity, as the enormous exegetical and dogmatic literature we have at our disposal attests. As in 'symbols', so in all theology, 'believing', 'faith' is a fundamental category. It is also the starting point of catechesis, as the first act with which we respond to God's revelation.

5. In the present meeting we will limit ourselves to one source, which however summarises all the others. It is the conciliar constitution Dei Verbum of Vatican II. We read the following: "It pleased God in his goodness and wisdom to reveal himself and to manifest the mystery of his will (cf. Eph 1:9), through which men, through Christ, the Word made flesh in the Holy Spirit, have access to the Father and are made sharers in the divine nature . . . (cf. Eph 2:18; 2 Pet 1:4)" (Dei Verbum, 2).

"To the God who reveals is due the obedience of faith (cf. Rom 16:26; 1:5; 2 Cor 10:5-6), by which man freely surrenders himself to God in his entirety by lending him 'the full obedience of intellect and will' (Vatican Council I, Dei Filius, 3) and voluntarily consenting to the revelation given by him" (Dei Verbum, 5).

In these words of the conciliar document is contained the answer to the question: what does it mean to "believe". The explanation is concise, but condenses a great wealth of content. We will have to penetrate more extensively into this explanation of the Council later on, which has a scope equivalent to that of a technical definition, so to speak.

One thing is first of all obvious: there is a genetic and organic link between our Christian 'creed' and that particular 'initiative' of God himself, which is called 'revelation'.

Therefore, catechesis on the 'creed' (faith) must be carried out together with catechesis on divine revelation. Logically and historically, revelation precedes faith. Faith is conditioned by revelation. It is man's response to divine revelation.

Let us say right now that it is possible and right to give this answer, because God is credible. No one is like him. No one possesses the authority of truth like it. In no case is the conceptual and semantic value of the word so usual in human language: 'I believe', 'I believe you', realised as in faith in God.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 13 March 1985]

Faith in Christ

1. Looking at the primary objective of the Jubilee, which is the "strengthening of faith and of the witness of Christians" (Tertio millennio adveniente, n. 42), after outlining in previous catecheses the basic characteristics of the salvation offered by Christ, today we pause to reflect on the faith he expects of us.

"The obedience of faith", Dei Verbum teaches, "must be given to God as he reveals himself" (n. 5). God revealed himself in the Old Covenant, asking of the people he had chosen a fundamental response of faith. In the fullness of time, this faith is called to be renewed and increased, to respond to the revelation of the incarnate Son of God. Jesus expressly asks for it when he speaks to his disciples at the Last Supper: "Believe in God, believe also in me" (Jn 14:1).

2. Jesus had already asked the group of the 12 Apostles to profess their faith in his person. At Caesarea Philippi, after questioning his disciples about the people's opinion of his identity, he asks: "But who do you say that I am?" (Mt 16:15). The reply comes from Simon Peter: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (16:16).

Jesus immediately confirms the value of this profession of faith, stressing that it stems not only from human thought idea but from heavenly inspiration: "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven" (Mt 16:17). These statements, in strongly Semitic tones, indicate the total, absolute and supreme revelation: the one that concerns the person of Christ, Son of God.

Peter's profession of faith will remain the definitive expression of Christ's identity. Mark uses this same expression to begin his Gospel (cf. Mk 1:1) and John refers to it at the end of his, saying that he has written his Gospel so that you may believe "that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God", and that in believing you may have life in his name (cf. Jn 20:31).

3. In what does faith consist? The Constitution Dei Verbum explains that by faith, "man freely commits his entire self to God, making 'the full submission of his intellect and will to God who reveals'" (n. 5). Thus faith is not only the intellect's adherence to the truth revealed, but also a submission of the will and a gift of self to God revealing himself. It is a stance that involves one's entire existence.

The Council also recalls that this faith requires "the grace of God to move [man] and assist him; he must have the interior helps of the Holy Spirit, who moves the heart and converts it to God, who opens the eyes of the mind and 'makes it easy for all to accept and believe the truth'" (ibid.). In this way we can see how, on the one hand, faith enables us to welcome the truth contained in Revelation and proposed by the Magisterium of those who, as Pastors of God's People, have received a "sure charism of truth" (Dei Verbum, n. 8). On the other hand, faith also spurs us to true and deep consistency, which must be expressed in all aspects of a life modeled on that of Christ.

4. As a fruit of grace, faith exercises an influence on events. This is wonderfully seen in the exemplary case of the Blessed Virgin. Her faith-filled acceptance of the angel's message at the Annunciation is decisive for Jesus' very coming into the world. Mary is the Mother of Christ because she first believed in him.

At the wedding feast in Cana, Mary, obtains the miracle through her faith. Despite Jesus' reply, which does not seem very favourable, she keeps her trustful attitude, thus becoming a model of the bold and constant faith which overcomes obstacles.

The faith of the Caananite woman was also bold and insistent. Jesus countered this woman, who had come to seek the cure of her daughter, with the Father's plan which restricted his mission to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The Caananite replied with the full force of her faith and obtained the miracle: "O woman! Great is your faith! Be it done for you as you desire" (Mt 15:28).

5. In many other cases the Gospel witnesses to the power of faith. Jesus expresses his admiration for the centurion's faith: "Truly, I say to you, not even in Israel have I found such faith" (Mt 8:10). And to Bartimaeus: "Go your way your faith has made you well" (Mk 10:52). He says the same thing to the woman with a haemorrhage (cf. Mk 5:34). 

His words to the father of the epileptic who wanted his son to be cured are no less striking: "All things are possible to him who believes" (Mk 9:23).

The role of faith is to co-operate with this omnipotence. Jesus asks for this co-operation to the point that upon returning to Nazareth, he works almost no miracles because the inhabitants of his village did not believe in him (cf. Mk 6:5-6). For Jesus, faith has a decisive importance for the purposes of salvation.

St Paul will develop Christ's teaching when, in conflict with those who wished to base the hope of salvation on observance of the Jewish law, he forcefully affirms that faith in Christ is the only source of salvation: "We hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law" (Rom 3:28). However, it must not be forgotten that St Paul was thinking of that authentic and full faith which "works through love" (Gal 5:6). True faith is animated by love of God, which is inseparable from love for our brothers and sisters.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 18 March 1998]

The initial scene of the Gospel in today’s liturgy (see Jn 6,24-35) shows us some boats moving towards Capernaum: the crowd is going to look for Jesus. We might think that this is a very good thing, yet the Gospel teaches us that it is not enough to seek God; we must also ask why we are seeking him. Indeed, Jesus says: “You seek me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves” (v. 26). The people, in fact, had witnessed the miracle of the multiplication of the loaves, but they had not grasped the meaning of that gesture: they stopped at the external miracle, they stopped at the material bread: there only, without going beyond, to the meaning of this.

Here then is a first question we can ask ourselves: why do we seek the Lord? Why do I seek the Lord? What are the motivations  for my faith, for our faith? We need to discern this, because among the many temptations we encounter in life, among the many temptations there is one that we might call idolatrous temptation. It is the one that drives us to seek God for our own use, to solve problems, to have thanks to Him what we cannot obtain on our own, for our interests. But in this way faith remains superficial and even, if I may say so, faith remains miraculous: we look for God to feed us and then forget about Him when we are satiated. At the centre of this immature faith is not God, but our own needs. I think of our interests, many things … It is right to present our needs to God's heart, but the Lord, who acts far beyond our expectations, wishes to live with us first of all in a relationship of love. And true love is disinterested, it is free: one does not love to receive a favour in return! This is self-interest; and very often in life we are motivated by self-interest.

A second question that the crowd asks Jesus can help us: “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” (v. 28). It is as if the people, provoked by Jesus, were saying: “How can we purify our search for God? How do we go from a magical faith, which thinks only of our own needs, to a faith that pleases God?” And Jesus shows the way: He answers that the work of God is to welcome the One whom the Father has sent, that is, welcoming Himself, Jesus. It is not adding religious practices or observing special precepts; it is welcoming Jesus, it is welcoming Him into our lives, living a story of love with Jesus. It is He who will purify our faith. We are not able to do this on our own. But the Lord wants a loving relationship with us: before the things we receive and do, there is Him to love. There is a relationship with Him that goes beyond the logic of interest and calculation.

This applies to God, but it also applies to our human and social relationships: when we seek first and foremost the satisfaction of our needs, we risk using people and exploiting situations for our own ends. How many times have we heard it said of someone; “But he uses people and then forgets about them”? Using people for one’s own gain: this is bad. And a society that puts interests instead of people at its centre is a society that does not generate life. The Gospel’s invitation is this: rather than being concerned only with the material bread that feeds us, let us welcome Jesus as the bread of life and, starting out from our friendship with Him, learn to love each other. Freely and without calculation. Love given freely and without calculation, without using people, freely, with generosity, with magnanimity.

Let us now pray to the Holy Virgin, She who lived the most beautiful story of love with God, that she may give us the grace to open ourselves to the encounter with her Son.

[Pope Francis, Angelus 1 August 2021]

(Lk 24:13-35)

After first persecutions (64), the bloody civil war in Rome (68-69) and the destruction of Jerusalem’s Temple (70), the empire rebels tended to decrease - together with the second generation Christians, direct witnesses of the Apostolic teaching.

In this reality, completely new and threatened by the danger of routine, perhaps more than a dozen years after the fall of Masada (73), Lk draws up a Gospel for converted Hellenists - but educated to the ideal of a ‘Greek man’.

Its purpose was to put a stop to defections, encourage new faithful, allow those who were culturally distant to have a living experience of the Lord.

The Risen One has a Life that is no longer subject to the senses, because Full.

Now it is the community that manifests Him Present [or - unfortunately - useless and absent].

Conditioned by a false vision inoculated by bad teachers and pagan values, the disciples still felt bewildered in the face of “failure”.

The expectations of religion, of philosophies, of life in the empire, made them gloomy and disoriented during the tests of Faith.

Everyone was waiting for the «divine man»: ruler, possessor, revered, avenger, titled and super-affirmed. Able to drag his associates to the same “fortune”.

Lk overturns the banal perspective, because within each of us there is an innate wisdom, sometimes suffocated by external ideas, but different.

Only another intelligence of the Holy Scriptures that still resound full of critical prophecy - warms our hearts and makes us recognizable in Christ.

Wisdom that is combined with the quality of life experienced in a multifaceted and indigent fraternity, but which does not abandon anyone.

In fact, in the authentic church, the synergy of differences and opposite sides configures a ‘new covenant’; opens the eyes to all, intensely manifesting the Son.

And the Risen One does not cling to the latest arrivals in a paternalistic way (vv.28.31) but calls with confidence to reinterpret Him in love, without borders and identified roles.

His Presence in spirit and deed allows anyone a coined-broken life caliber without prior conditions of completion.

Hence the Return (v.33) and personal Announcement (v.35), instead of indifference or flight.

The passage from Lk is one of the most profound testimonies of the Passover of Jesus.

The tragedy of the Cross frightens, so does failure. But we do not frankly meet the Lord as an executioner, or in the fervor of a victorious war.

Christ is not a colonel. Liberator yes.

The new dreamed order will not be artificial, procedural, external; nor achieved with military triumph: it would disown Him.

We meet the Risen One outside the tomb, we grasp Him on a journey and in the authentic meaning of the «living Scriptures»; in the «Bread breaking» that illuminates the sense of ecclesial life.

We personally «see» the ‘Son raised’, building up the new community of disciples that blossom because of the reverses - so that the sisters and brothers can also meet with Easter.

Apostles not lost in history.

In their «incessant beginning» there is a ‘discovery’ and something special, abnormal, irrepressible; that lays continuous foundations.

To internalize and live the message:

When have you experienced a Jesus who gently approaches and takes your step? Is the Cross a catastrophe for you?

[3rd Easter Sunday (year A), April 19, 2026]

Lk 24:13-35 (13-48)

The disciples question, they are confused; they bounce anxieties and accusations off each other, disillusioned and frustrated - but what seems to concern them most is not so much the mocking death of the Master, but (paradoxically) his very divine condition.

What they fear is precisely the crumbling of their hopes for glory.

They are simply afraid of not feeling supported by someone who has achieved notoriety, in order to obtain the longed-for dominance.

What disappoints them is precisely that Jesus could be the Risen One: that is, the one who has grasped and incorporated into himself taken up by the Father into his own full Life because he recognised himself in the humble Son.

Enthroned at the right hand of the heavenly throne, because he is true, and a servant of others.

Such apostles have their eyes fixed on dreams of principality, wealth, and supremacy.

On this basis, it is impossible to recognise the Presence of Christ - who wants us to stay in the present and see the future.

Just as before, they are heading to Emmaus, a place of ancient nationalist military victories.

The very name Cleopas was an abbreviation of Cleopas, which means 'of the illustrious, prestigious father'.

The disciples are still filled with the ambition for success: this is their god.

It is still triumph - not authenticity and self-sacrifice to the point of death - that would change the world.

For these followers, the son of the carpenter Galileo was still the Nazarene - which meant subversive, rebellious: one of the many messiahs who were supposed to take revenge on Roman oppression and seize power.

Quietly, sick with ambition, they return to considering as their "authority" (v. 20) the very bandits disguised as men of God who had killed the Master.

So Jesus must once again take our place and insist on interpreting the Scriptures correctly.

From them it emerges that the concrete good of real, multifaceted women and men, who even seem contradictory, is a non-negotiable principle.

The Greek text of Luke says that Jesus 'does hermeneutics' (v. 27).

In short: the passages of the Holy Scriptures, from Moses to the Prophets and beyond, should not be recounted and perceived by ear, but interpreted.

They are teachings, not stories or narratives of anecdotes.

We too, in love with our ideas, find it difficult to engage in the work of digging up stories of failure in order to extract pearls of wisdom from them.

But conflicts are valuable mirrors of internal struggles.

The Word of God, untamed by clichés, helps us to perceive events and the world, even that of the soul, in the authenticity of providential signs.

They are there for a journey of evolution, where some of the most precious surprises await us.

This is not in order to become cunning or strong, nor even good in the usual sense.

Even negative events and emotions happen in order to develop the ability to look within and respond to the inner call.

Vocation-character, in bad times: wonders for great joy, like a sun inside, fiery and luminous (without judgement).

A protagonist who brings out unexpected qualities; a worker who tills the soil and waits.

By changing our way of perceiving, the new energy of the Word takes our considerations to a different dimension.

Confusions are no longer looked at to be resolved, but to understand their meaning.

We learn to intuit that our disturbances, sufferings and problems are often like clothes - even coats that we willingly do not discard.

Throw away these external rags, and we will intuit in the same disappointments a Presence that has come to visit us.

An alternative consciousness that wants to live and flow within us.

It will bring a Gift that brings another Relationship, to drive away banality and its thousand forms of slavery.

Over time, it will have the strength to settle within us.

And when personal anxieties, conditioned intentions and conformist expectations lead us into a territory where everything enters into another game, into a completely different reality that Voice will increasingly become the fertiliser and substrate of our ability to correspond, to grow and to depart; to detach ourselves from common ideas and find new positions.

A new kingdom, another founding memory; unprecedented calls, different hopes, convictions, trusts.

Little by little, we realise: it is in the same sense as the dramatic story of the authentic Son that our life as saved people passes.

Thus, instead of always looking back or only forward, we begin to perceive the prophetic; and we bring it to consciousness.

While the disciples of the glorious 'messiah' continue to be directed to the old 'village' - a place of narrow-mindedness, misunderstanding, even hostility to God's Call - the Risen One goes further.

Then he enters, but not into the village [the common village of dogmas, of even glossy ways, or of traditions, of conformism] because he is already Present. And in any case, he is not a Shepherd who loses his flock.

In filigree, we grasp the rhythm of our worship: entrance, homily, Eucharistic liturgy, final choir, missionary announcement... whose essential meaning is the proposal: 'to break life'.

It is sharing that makes the being of Jesus perceptible - in the Church that becomes wisdom and fraternal nourishment for the completeness of all.

'This is my Body' means 'This is Me'.

God expresses himself in a gesture, the breaking of bread - not in a sacred object.

It alludes to the Community that transcends differences and comes together to become shared Food for the benefit of others.

Such is the essential, truly sacred Call.

No preventive sterilisation: only the all-encompassing experience makes the divine Presence perceptible.

'He made himself invisible' because the Risen One has a life that is not subject to the banal perception of the ordinary senses.

But He comes to the Church, which freely offers itself for the life of the voiceless, the distant, the different; not for good manners and bad habits.

'Take and eat': make my story your own, the choice of conviviality of differences and contrasting sides. These convey dignity to any path.

The news is too good: the barley harvest is abandoned [end of the first ten days of April: in Palestine it was the right time to start harvesting] and they set off immediately to proclaim the Good News.

The affairs of the earth are put aside, so that they are not the only ones to go well - becoming explicit heralds, advocates and sustenance for those who seek life.

Broken: different Perfection

After the first persecutions (64), the bloody civil war in Rome (68-69) and the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem (70), the rebels of the empire tended to diminish - along with the second generation of Christians, direct witnesses of the Apostolic teaching.

In this completely new reality, threatened by the danger of routine, perhaps more than a dozen years after the fall of Masada (73), Luke wrote a Gospel for Hellenistic converts - but educated in the ideal of the Greek man.

His aim was to stem the tide of defections, encourage new believers, and allow those who were culturally distant to have a living experience of the Lord.

The Risen One no longer has a life subject to the senses, because it is full. Now it is the community that manifests his presence [or - unfortunately - his uselessness and absence].

Conditioned by a false view instilled by bad teachers and pagan values, the disciples still felt bewildered in the face of failure.

The expectations of religion, philosophies, and life in the empire made them gloomy and lost during the trials of faith.

Everyone was waiting for the divine man: a ruler, a landowner, revered, avenging, titled and super-successful. Capable of leading his people to the same fortune.

Luke overturns the banal perspective, because within each of us there is an innate wisdom, sometimes suffocated by external ideas, but different.

Only a different understanding of the sacred Scriptures, which still resonate with critical prophecy, warms the heart and makes everyone recognisable in Christ.

Wisdom that goes hand in hand with the quality of life experienced in a multifaceted and yet destitute fraternity, but one that abandons no one.

In the authentic church, in fact, the synergy of differences or different and shadowed sides configures a New Covenant; it opens the eyes of all, intensely manifesting the Son.

And the Risen One does not cling to the newcomers in a paternalistic way (vv. 28.31) but calls with confidence to reinterpret him in love, without boundaries and identified roles.

His Presence in spirit and actions allows anyone a calibre of life that is minted and broken without prior conditions of completeness.

Hence the return (v. 33) and the personal proclamation (v. 35), instead of indifference or flight.

The passage from Luke is one of the most profound testimonies of Jesus' Easter.

The tragedy of the Cross still frightens us, as does failure.

But we do not encounter the Lord frankly as an avenger, or in the fervour of a 'victorious' holy war.

Christ is not a leader. He is a liberator, yes, but not of an idea or of a single chosen people.

In short, the new order he dreamed of will not be artificial, procedural, foreign; nor will it be achieved through military triumph: he would disown it.

We encounter the Risen One outside the tomb.

We encounter Jesus on a journey, and in the authentic sense of the 'living scriptures'; in the breaking of bread that illuminates coexistence and the richer meaning of ecclesial life.

We see personally the Son exalted, building the new community of disciples who are not lost in history - indeed, they flourish because of setbacks.

Ensuring that our brothers and sisters can also encounter Easter.

In their incessant beginning, there is a discovery and something special, abnormal, disruptive; which lays continuous foundations.

To internalise and live the message:

When have you experienced a Jesus who gently approaches and takes your pace? Is the Cross a catastrophe for you?

Which side of your personality captures that of the Eucharistic Christ and in between? Perhaps something one-sided, or obvious?

What distracts you from the blindness of the present Life?

It does not create a hierarchy: in the middle and wounded, or a ghost

(Lk 24:35-48)

We do not recognise a person by their hands and feet (v. 39).

The Risen One has a life that escapes the perception of the senses, yet the Resurrection does not annul the person, but rather expands them.

The identity and being that distinguishes him is of another nature, but the heart is the same, characterising. Love to the end: action [hands] and journey [feet] without reserve, which non-faith marginalises, humiliates, kills.

Christ cannot be understood outside the experience of sharing, witness, Mission - the point of the text - which extends to all men.

Evangelisation starting from direct heralds and enthusiastic town criers. Centred on the core of the Proclamation, which moves everything and gives access (vv.35-).

Finally, thanks to the intelligence of the Scriptures, which brings us out of clichés and vague interpretative automatisms.

In specific listening and in forgiveness that makes us participants; in commitment that risks, walks, and speaks.

The Creator's human project took on a pedagogical configuration in the Law. It was taken up, actualised, and purified by the prophets, and sung in the psalms (v. 44) .

But the conversion proposed by Christ is not a return to religiosity, but 'a change [of mind] in remission' (v. 47).

The change of convictions and mentality is 'for the forgiveness of sins': that is, in overcoming the sense of inadequacy preached by the manipulative religious centre.

Its formal and empty directives prevent women and men from corresponding to their roots, character, vocation - to joy, to the fullness of personal fulfilment, to the great Desire that pulsates within each one.

In Jesus, the history of salvation takes on and redeems the totality of humanity: it becomes the privileged place of the true seal of the eternal Covenant between the Father and his children. Only in Him does our life go in the right direction.

This awareness was at the heart of all the early liturgical signs, which in words and gestures expressed the attitude of gratuitousness and welcome that animated belief.

In this way, even the multifaceted encounter; and the risk of the mission of Peace-Shalôm (v. 36): the presence of the Messiah himself, actualised in the Spirit.

The Lord's Passover gave meaning to the people's past and was the foundation of freedom in love, in coexistence - for personal and ecclesial work.

The beginning of new configurations. 'Done' par excellence [in this sense, Luke in vv. 41-43 insists on the reality of the resurrection].

Here is the beginning, source and culmination of authentic history - in the very figure of the Eucharist as the Table of the 'Fish' [acrostic, in Greek, of the divine condition of the Son of Man].

In short, we are eyewitnesses, not gullible or victims of collective hallucinations.

In the Risen One, we do not see projections of anxieties and frustrations converging; we do not seek him for compensation.

In the early years after the Master's death, some disciples effectively defended themselves against sceptics by recounting apparitions.

The most convincing and genuine manifestation of the Living One was in fact the wisdom and quality of life expressed by the early communities.

Those who 'see and touch' are those disciples who become so involved that their soul movements, their exodus to the peripheries, and their passionate gestures finally coincide with the Master's own wounds of love: "Touch me and see" (v. 39).

This points to an event and story of admirable light for all, which becomes extended history, from brother to brother.

A weighty testimony of the divine (v. 48) - in the Yes of being, even if affected or destroyed by the archaic sacred society of the outside world.

In the early days, believers - here and there - managed to do so thanks to the help of fraternities in which the Person of the authentic Messiah manifested himself persuasively, because he was 'in the midst' (v. 36).

Not 'above' or 'in front' - nor with ethics and dogmas.

Therefore, in the assemblies, there should never have been anyone (for life) who claimed to represent Him and had a title and a prominent position, while others were destined to be in the background or subordinate (equally permanent).

Everyone should have been equidistant from God: no one privileged, no one installed.

No one leading the ranks - or closer to the Lord, while others were far away.

The Lord revealed Himself as Living in conviviality - the key word, the pinnacle of the entire Bible.

Sharing also in the summary, which found the ways of intimacy and sensitive, personal confidence: 'They gave him a portion' (v. 42).

The concrete and global perspective of the Cross as the source of Life was a transmutation of the sense of haughty and distant 'glory'.

Whether naturally talented or not, those who represented the Risen One were always within reach: no chosen ones - no one sent to the rear.

Even the first community tasks reflected the character of a Jesus who was shareable, spontaneous, accessible to anyone - at the centre and in a position of reciprocity.

No one born perfect, predestined, at the top.

For this reason, the Announcement had to begin in the Holy City (v. 47), configured to the opposite of life - compromised, inert, secretive; pyramidal, co-opted, and murderer of prophets.

That of the Eternal City... remained the first of the 'pagan peoples' [v. 47 Greek text] to be evangelised!

Only a strong identity of compelling Faith, Hope Elsewhere and real Communion could convert it from sin and establish a code for understanding the Scriptures.

And not make Christ a ghost (v. 37).

In the early communities, listening to the personal and common inner world was particularly emphasised, because the direction proposed by the Master seemed completely counterintuitive.

Despite the chaos of external certainties, the transition from fear to Freedom came from a tolerant perception - starting from visceral experiences.

It was precisely the bottlenecks that accentuated change and internalisation, and tore the disciples away from their habit of creating conformist harmonies.

People then relied more willingly on the paths of the soul. Thus encountering one's own deep nature - a new axis of life, starting from the roots.

The search for a new compass for one's own paths, the loss of predictable references, and social discomfort brought one into contact with oneself and others in an authentic way.

Feeling anxiety, discomfort, and wounds allowed them to recognise their Calling - even though the external way in which they saw and faced normal or spiritual existence suited them.

Having to move away from their habits, they no longer shied away from the precious revelation: the primordial and humanising intimacy deposited in the fraternal communion of the new crucified Way.

Educated by the paradox of hardship, the uncertain apostles gradually became seekers of a trace, of a more pertinent route; pilgrims of unexpected codes.

'Witnesses' (v. 48): fathers and mothers of a new humanity.

To internalise and live the message:

How do you experience the identity of the Crucified and Risen One? And his Glory? What makes your heart burn, and Who do you radiate?

Are you someone who puts himself at the head of the group? Or, 'with Jesus in the midst', do you contribute to the happiness of all?

Real Presence

Transformed, he does not erase the signs of the crucifixion

Today [...] we encounter – in the Gospel according to Luke – the risen Jesus who appears in the midst of his disciples (cf. Lk 24:36), who, incredulous and afraid, think they are seeing a ghost (cf. Lk 24:37). Romano Guardini writes: "The Lord is changed. He no longer lives as before. His existence... is not comprehensible. Yet it is corporeal, it encompasses... his entire life, his destiny, his passion and his death. Everything is reality. It may be changed, but it is still tangible reality" (Il Signore. Meditazioni sulla persona e la vita di N.S. Gesù Cristo [The Lord: Meditations on the Person and Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ], Milan 1949, 433). Since the resurrection does not erase the signs of the crucifixion, Jesus shows the Apostles his hands and feet. And to convince them, he even asks for something to eat. So the disciples "offered him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate it in front of them" (Lk 24:42-43). St Gregory the Great comments that "the fish broiled on the fire signifies nothing other than the passion of Jesus, Mediator between God and men. For he deigned to hide himself in the waters of the human race, accepted to be caught in the snare of our death, and was as if placed in the fire because of the sufferings he endured at the time of his passion" (Hom. in Evang. XXIV, 5: CCL 141, Turnhout 1999, 201).

Thanks to these very realistic signs, the disciples overcome their initial doubt and open themselves to the gift of faith; and this faith allows them to understand the things written about Christ 'in the Law of Moses, in the Prophets and in the Psalms' (Lk 24:44). We read, in fact, that Jesus 'opened their minds to understand the Scriptures and said to them, " Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all nations, for you are witnesses of these things' (Lk 24:45-48). The Saviour assures us of his real presence among us, through the Word and the Eucharist. Just as the disciples of Emmaus recognised Jesus in the breaking of bread (cf. Lk 24:35), so too do we encounter the Lord in the Eucharistic celebration. In this regard, St Thomas Aquinas explains that "it is necessary to recognise, according to Catholic faith, that the whole Christ is present in this Sacrament... because the divinity never left the body that he assumed" (S.Th. III, q. 76, a. 1).

[Pope Benedict, Regina Coeli, 22 April 2012]

As with a living

1. May the light of your face shine upon us, Lord! (cf. Ps 4:7)

With these words, the Church prays in today's liturgy. She asks for divine light. She asks for the gift of knowing the Truth. She asks for faith.

Faith is the knowledge of the Truth, which comes from the testimony of God himself.

At the heart of our faith is the resurrection of Christ, through which God himself bore witness to the Crucified One. The testimony of the Living God confirmed in the resurrection the truth of the Gospel that Jesus of Nazareth proclaimed. It confirmed the truth of all his works and all his words. It confirmed the truth of his mission. The resurrection gave the definitive and most complete expression of that messianic power that was in Jesus Christ. Truly, he is the one sent by God. And divine is the word that comes from his lips.

When, today, on the third Sunday of Easter, we invoke: "Let the light of your face shine upon us, Lord" (cf. Ps 4:7), we ask that through the resurrection of Christ our faith may be renewed, illuminating the paths of our lives and directing them towards the Living God.

2. At the same time, today's Sunday liturgy shows us how this faith was built – and continues to be built – which, being a true gift from God, has at the same time its human dimension and form.

The resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is the main source of this light, from which the knowledge of the Truth revealed by God develops in us. The knowledge and acceptance of it as divine truth.

To form the human dimension of faith, Christ himself chose witnesses to the resurrection from among men. These witnesses were to become those who, from the beginning, were bound to him as disciples, among whom he alone chose the Twelve, making them his apostles.

Jesus of Nazareth also appeared alive after his resurrection to them, who were witnesses of his death on the cross. He spoke with them and in various ways convinced them of his identity, of the reality of his human body.

"Why are you troubled, and why do doubts arise in your hearts? Look at my hands and my feet: it is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see I have" (Lk 24:38-39).

He spoke to them in this way when "they were amazed and frightened, thinking they were seeing a ghost" (Lk 24:37).

"But because of their great joy and amazement, they still did not believe it and were astonished. He said to them, 'Do you have anything here to eat?' They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate it in front of them" (Lk 24:41-43).

Thus was formed the group of witnesses to the resurrection. They were the men who personally knew Christ, heard his words, saw his works, experienced his death on the cross and, afterwards, saw him alive and conversed with him as with a living person after the resurrection.

3. When these men, the apostles and disciples of the Lord, after receiving the Holy Spirit, began to speak publicly about Christ, when they began to proclaim him to men (first in Jerusalem), they first of all referred to the commonly known facts.

'You handed him over and denied him before Pilate, when he had decided to release him,' Peter said to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, 'but you denied the Holy and Righteous One and asked for a murderer to be granted to you' (i.e. Barabbas)! (Acts 3:13-14).

From the events surrounding Christ's death, the speaker moves on to the Resurrection: "... you killed the author of life. But God raised him from the dead, and we are witnesses to this" (Acts 3:15).

Peter speaks alone, but at the same time he speaks on behalf of the entire apostolic college: "we are witnesses" (Acts 3:15). And he adds: "Now, brothers, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did your leaders" (Acts 3:17).

4. From the description of events, from the testimony of the Resurrection, the apostle moves on to prophetic exegesis.

Christ himself had prepared his disciples for this exegesis of death and Resurrection.

We have proof of this in the encounter described in today's Gospel (according to Luke). The Risen One says to his disciples: "These are the words I spoke to you while I was still with you: everything written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled" (Lk 24:44).

". And he said, 'Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. You are witnesses of these things' (Lk 24:46-48).

And the evangelist adds: “Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures” (Lk 24:45).

From Peter’s speech in the Acts of the Apostles, which we read in today’s liturgy, we can see how effective this “opening of their minds” was.

After presenting the events connected with the death and resurrection of Christ, Peter continues: “But God has thus fulfilled what he had foretold through the mouth of all the prophets, that his Christ would die. Repent, then, and change your ways, so that your sins may be blotted out...” (Acts 3:18-20).

In these words of the apostle, we find a clear echo of Christ's words: of the enlightenment that the disciples experienced in their encounter with the Risen Lord.

Thus, the faith of the first generation of confessors of Christ, the generation of the apostles' disciples, was built up. It sprang directly from the testimony of eyewitnesses of the Cross and the Resurrection.

5. What does it mean to be a Christian?

It means continuing to accept the testimony of the Apostles, the eyewitnesses. It means believing with the same faith that was born in them from the works and words of the Risen Lord.

The Apostle John writes (this is the second reading of today's liturgy): 'By this we know that we have known him (that is, Christ) if we keep his commandments. Whoever says, 'I know him,' but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him; but whoever keeps his word, in him the love of God is truly perfect" (1 Jn 2:3-5).

The apostle speaks of living faith. Faith is alive through the works that are in accordance with it. These are the works of charity. Faith is alive through the love of God. Love is expressed in the observance of the commandments. There can be no contradiction between knowledge ("I know him") and the action of a confessor of Christ. Only those who complete their faith with works remain in the truth.

Thus, the apostle John addresses the recipients of his first letter with the affectionate word 'little children' and invites them 'not to sin' (cf. 1 Jn 2:1). At the same time, however, he writes: 'But if anyone has sinned, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 Jn 2:1f).

John, apostle and evangelist, proclaims in the words of his letter, written towards the end of the first century, the same truth that Peter proclaimed shortly after the Lord's ascension. This is the truth about conversion and the forgiveness of sins through the power of Christ's death and resurrection.

6. What does it mean to be a Christian?

To be a Christian – today as then, in the first generation of confessors of Christ – means to continue to accept the testimony of the apostles, eyewitnesses. It means believing with the same faith that was born in them from the works and words of Christ, confirmed by his death and resurrection.

We too, belonging to the present generation of confessors of Christ, must ask to have the same experience as the two disciples of Emmaus: "Lord Jesus, make us understand the Scriptures; may our hearts burn within us when you speak to us" (cf. Lk 24:32).

May our hearts burn within us! For faith cannot be merely a cold calculation of the intellect. It must be enlivened by love. It lives through works in which the truth revealed by God is expressed as the inner truth of man.

Then we too – even if we have not been eyewitnesses of the works and words, of the death and resurrection – inherit the testimony of the Apostles. And we ourselves also become witnesses of Christ.

To be a Christian is also to be a witness of Christ.

7. Then faith – living faith – is formed as a dialogue between the Living God and living man; we find some expressions of this dialogue in today's liturgical psalm: 'When I call upon you, answer me, O God, my righteousness: you have delivered me from distress; have mercy on me, hear my prayer' (Ps 4:2). '... The Lord hears me when I call to him. / Tremble and do not sin; / reflect on your bed and be still. / Offer sacrifices of righteousness / and trust in the Lord. / Many say, 'Who will show us any good?' / Let the light of your face shine upon us, O Lord. / You have put more joy in my heart / than when their grain and wine abound. / I lie down in peace and sleep comes at once: / you alone, Lord, make me dwell in safety" (Ps 4:4-9).

And the psalmist himself adds: "Know that the Lord does wonders for his faithful ones" (Ps 4:4).

[Pope John Paul II, homily to Sts. Marcellinus and Peter, 25 April 1982]