The double address of worship, but the Axis is to be with Him
(Lk 6:12-19)
"He went out to the mountain to pray and spent the night in prayer to God" (v.12).
"And the whole crowd sought to touch Him, for a Power went out from Him and healed all" (v.19).
Lk reflects the double direction of worship in the primitive communities.
First, the Prayer as a significant opening to the Father and internal celebration among disciples (vv.13-17). Then the public proclamation (with works) to the people.
The community is close: God is in our history.
The idea of a distant Kingdom produces separations, (pastorally) inconsistent pyramidal hierarchies. Sometimes, dispersive cultivation of internal interests passed off as great sensitivity and altruism.
In short, to walk seriously alongside oneself and others, it is essential to first mature, wherever we live.
This applies to taking different initiatives; even possibly to rebelling against the stagnant landscape that likes to return to old-fashioned securities.
In this way, there may be less than noble motives for wanting to get everywhere at once, to run everywhere to make proselytes, and to do so out of opposition, without a "dream of friendship" [cf. encyclical Fratelli Tutti, passim].
For he who cultivates many lusts, projects them; he procures his own murky influences.
That is why prayer and reflection are necessary - indispensable also to Jesus (v.12) - which give us the sense of our being in the world, the Father's vision, and a right disposition.
Deep meditations and spontaneous prayers annihilate infidelities that do not offer genuine life, authentic motives, or values of the spirit.
Prayers undermine and demolish the dehumanisations, the emotions that alienate us and alienate us from our brothers, the pitfalls that tend to build other temples and shrines.
The same charge of universality and 'sense of urgency' are contained in the rootedness to values conveyed by dialogue with God. And his Mystery (for us), in relationships, in intimate self-knowledge.
Indeed... stimuli, virtuous principles, gaps and hidden sides are complementary energetic aspects.
It seems a paradox, but the interest in the needs of the multitudes is an issue exquisitely rooted in the intimate, not at all external.
It is from oneself and from the community that one looks at the world with empathy, knowing how to recover its opposites.
It is the Way of the Interior that interpenetrates and activates the Way of the Exterior.
This is how we willingly pray: to immerse ourselves in the vibrant Source of being, and to shift our hasty gaze.
By contrast and hindrance, the habitual partiality that "gets in the way" does not grasp the value of the social and cultural polyhedron.
On the other hand, unfortunately, it is only by loving strength that one prefers to start from the too distant.
One must first heal what is intimate and close. He who is not free cannot emancipate anyone.
Thus, the only way to peer into the distance is to stick to the reason of things - the principle that one actively knows, if not misled by superficialities and reductions [individualistic or monovalent, one-sided and club-like].
By understanding the nature of creatures and increasingly conforming to it, all are inspired to transmute and complete themselves.
A non-alienating process that also enriches possible cultural sclerosis, without hysterical or external forcing.
All this, practising goodness even with oneself.
The Tao (XLVII) says: "Without going out the door, you know the world; without looking out the window, you glimpse the Way to Heaven. The farther you go, the less you know. That is why the saint does not go around and yet knows, does not see and yet discerns, does not act and yet completes".
It is only from the Source of being - the common home - that an undissociated, all-saved life springs forth, one that effectively endures and can expand.
Are we a sign of dedication and striving people? We do not do this for 'merit' or to gain sympathy.
Without being a cult, after a good training - which also imparts to us a wise tolerance, from the world within.
No extrinsic purpose, which would lose its soul and bring no change.
Not to distinguish the moment of Vocation from the moment of ministerial sending.
The way to Heaven is intertwined with the way of the Person and with the way of Nature ["like a sister, with whom we share existence, and like a beautiful mother who welcomes us into her arms": Laudato Si', no.1] or we will be busybodies.
None of the Apostles - ordinary people - were worthy of the Call (vv.13-15).
To understand this, and approach the meaning of their missional uniqueness, Jesus must spend an entire night in prayer (v.12).
Most of the first followers have names typical of Judaism, even of the time of the Patriarchs - indicating a mental and spiritual background rooted more in the ancient religion than in the new Faith; baggage not easy to handle.But even for the undecided, the Lord unleashes his power of full Life, precisely because he is an absolutely ordinary person full of limitations; not infrequently perplexed, even open opponents.
Peter was eager to come forward, though often backtracking - backtracking - to the point of becoming for Jesus a 'satan' [(Mt 16:23; Mk 8:33): in the culture of the ancient East, an official of the great ruler, sent to act as a controller and delator - practically an accuser].
James of Zebedee and John were brothers, ardent fundamentalists, and in a wrathful manner wanted the Master for themselves alone, as well as the first places.
Philip [conditioned perhaps by a Hellenistic extraction, as his name indicates] at first sight did not seem a very practical fellow, nor quick to grasp the things of God.
Andrew, on the other hand, seemed to do well: an inclusive person.
According to well-known traditional identifications, Bartholomew was perhaps open but perplexed, because the Messiah did not correspond to him much.
Thomas always a little in and a little out.
Matthew - a collaborator, greedy accomplice of the oppressive system, and willingly extorting money from his people [the people ruthlessly condemned him].
Simon - the zealot, the Canaanite - a hothead.
Judas Iscariot a tormented, self-destructive for trusting old spiritual leaders - imbued with nationalist ideology, self-interest, opportunism and power.
Two others (James the younger son of Alphaeus, and Judas Thaddeus) mere disciples perhaps of no great prominence or capacity for initiative.
But the Kingdom is "local and universal" [Fratelli Tutti, nn.142-153], Near and by Name - as the Gospel passage from Lk.
This is the manifold, grasping, incomparable, close and precisely personal power that overcomes any possibility of ideal sabotage (due to adverse circumstances).
Power drawn both from prayer directed to the Father in Christ - in his nightly Listening (v.12) - as well as from works of love (vv.17-19).
Power in personal, sensitive, shared symbiosis.
Not for the excellent alone... or even in the time of global emergency there will be no healing work (v.19) but only external, accusatory and aimed at propaganda, proselytism.
Announcement and Mission of new Light received in Gift: where precisely not a single form or colour appears.
And the Axis is "being" with Him.
"This is what tradition has then formulated with the well-known expression: 'Contemplata aliis tradere' (cf. St Thomas, Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae, q. 188, art. 6)". [Pope Benedict].
For a contagion that is neither alarmist nor one-sided, monochromatic, but flourishing, multifaceted, sometimes 'hidden', and restless.
To internalise and live the message:
In your experience, what chain has united heaven and earth?
The (accusatory) list and effort of transgressions to be neurotically corrected?
Or a personal Calling, inclusive of your many faces in the soul - a Vocation supported by a Church that became an echo and a free Source of all-round understanding?