«Whom shall we go to?». Faith, a critical sign (not attenuated)

(Jn 6:60-69)

A God on our level? "This Logos is sclerotic" (v.60) - as if to say: to imagine that the Most High joins with the least in everything is an incomprehensible and offensive position.

Can the Eternal recognise Himself in a simple son of man - even subversive and out of the loop - alienated from established circuits?

As in his ministry in Judea, Jesus' last activity in Galilee ends in failure (v.66).

The official pious experience proceeded on the surface - centred on the visibility of events and elite judgement, then on a succubus reality.

Even the disciples who taste the new Word are disappointed by the Master, who substitutes the Father for the tradition of the 'fathers'.

Many of the people sought him as a miracle-worker - continuing to be content with the religious structure, the dominant reference points, the same material bread as always (and so on).

Christ is not for continuing to conform, but for consistent nourishment. Here is the crisis: it does not fail when one is faced with serious choices.

For their own use, the leaders propagated dead idols, which blandished petty ideas (and immediate interests) - and frightened no one who deserved it.

Instead, the Lord went beyond the demands and horizons of normality. He had a different key.

The nuptial drama could not be resolved in convenient parentheses, as in conformist devotions: which ultimately compromise nothing [as in the later bigoted idea of 'angel food'].

Proposals such as the communion of goods, the choice of the last place, the welcome given not only to clan neighbours and so on, overturn the idea of greatness and failure.

To get involved, the disciples would have to be ready to embrace Life in the Spirit.

Impassable territory... but you can't agree with everything: bargaining, negotiation, calculations and apparatuses have had their day. In today's global crisis, the aut aut aut is pressing.

The question troubles: "But do you also want to leave?" (v.67).

Peter responds in the plural, expressing the Faith of the small group that ventures out - and that can be ours, when we remain untethered by dissociations of life, or verifications and paroxysms of 'worldviews'.

The crisis in Galilee is not a pale historical memory, but a watershed at the centre of which we are all - every day. A persistent event, which separates us from easy enthusiasms - but leads the authentic journey.

Accepting this final challenge changes the boundaries of the narrow world that entangles the soul, thus the course of existence... even the ambitious one of the disciples who perhaps did not want the discomforts of another kingdom.

Especially in the (even sacred) world of externality and shouting, the dilemma is alive: that of the fulfilled, perfect personal way; which goes in the direction of intimate energy, not of circumstantial keys.

Deaf opposition from the leaders, interested murmuring from many followers: the choice to draw on another Life must be peremptory.

The ranks are thinning, the choices are no longer obvious, the voices are many (and so are the half-measures). The once safe place is undermined.

Is it better to be consistent? Is it not better to conform to power relationships or fashions?

Faith unites with the Lord, listening gives the right position, and in the Eucharist the intertwining of natures, human and divine, is produced.

Deep aspirations drive beyond calculations and the natural order.

In us, the incarnation and action of the only Guide we can trust continues.

The purity of truth does not shatter, rather it spills over.

Before the hardships in the desert, the people had doubted the divine presence ("in our midst").

The same happened in the Johannine communities of the late first century, which questioned the Presence of the Risen One in the breaking of bread.

Some had left the church to return to the "onions of Egypt". On the other hand, in the area of Ephesus there was no lack of wealth and attraction - guaranteed and sacralised by pagan religiosity.

The same devout life polarised around the inducement of the Temple of Artemis - transformed into one of the major banks of the ancient East - guaranteed a carefree and much more 'solid' and conspicuous quality of life than the humble Eucharistic sign.

What could those crumbs be worth compared to one of the seven wonders of the ancient world?

And then enjoy being surrounded by so many "proper" people around, therefore well inserted in public and private relations - as well as adhering to attractive proposals from every point of view, not least of which was profit [or discredit: cf. the Ephesian silversmiths of trinkets; goldsmiths and craftsmen outraged with Paul: Acts 19:23ff].With Jesus, only a small group remained, but they were more intimate - and asked the right question:

Is it also dignified not to be first in the class, and 'successful'?

Who knows how to value history, and every path, even defections?

What Person does not force us to be one-sided?

The epilogue of John 6 does not call for a discipline of extrinsic spiritual proposals.

Nor does he tell (as typical in the ancient East) of talismans or mythical plants 'that make the old man young', nor of a 'sacred fire of the gods'.

For Jesus does not advocate the arduous climbing of religions, but humanisation... that brings us closer. Concrete adherence.

A saved existence glosses over any idea of naturalistic sequels expressible by ancient symbols or metaphors.

Thus e.g. the outward icons of "Plant" or "Fire", which alluded to immortal life and the divine, are discarded altogether and even replaced by "flesh" and "blood".

Their opposite, but: the character of lambs.

The experience of divinisation cannot ignore the Paschal faith-relationship dimension, which elevates us only in the freedom to 'descend'.

In times of leisure and harmony, we are always surprised to notice that our innermost core demands a different Rest.

We understand that the longed-for Peace is not a matter of place, exclusive beaches or panoramas; nor of ingenious calculations, hypotheses, sophisticated worldviews or ideal situations, but of a just Person.

But if today we feel poised in every decision and at every moment, "Who can we trust" always?

Every day we need a You that encourages and refreshes, making us feel like protagonists and collaborators, not reserves or benchwarriors.  

Never will the Dharma convince us in earnest, nor a Book... the engine of a conversion (unless it is opened with a spear).

It is only an experience that does not trap us in solitude that changes us from lukewarm believers to critical witnesses.

We feel the urgency of a loving purpose, otherwise nothing makes sense; not even success.

In me, I distinctly perceive an inclination to only grant trust to Whom I feel in need, or in at least a slightly reciprocal relationship; in a feeling that at least inwardly qualifies.

A Person who helps me first of all to reconcile with my limitations; not to feel accepted in general, but understood and welcomed within a configured affair, of real forgiveness or redemption. Or at least relationship.

Something good is not enough for me: I need Someone to free me from narrow horizons, from conditioning that takes my breath away, from internal powers that demand, from external social idols that suffocate identity, making the reason I was born diminish.

I need encouragement when I become despondent, and then I feel a need for motherly hands that welcome, for fatherly hands that reassure; for a witness, for a glance.

I feel an impelling need for a Thou who reveals to me the Good on which to begin or begin again; I am in need of an Interlocutor who makes me realise that there is a future, even in adverse conditions - and at any age.

I am not interested in façade perfection: I hunger for a Person who does not betray, who does not let me fall to the ground at the most beautiful, to the point of touching the dust. 

I seek a Friendship that doesn't mock and trample. And let it not be 'now and then': let it notice, let it heal, let it understand me and let me breathe, then raise my head and get back on track... until I too am able to pull sisters and brothers to growth.

Instead of the thunder and lightning of Sinai, which overpowers and repels, I ask for an attunement on my own level, which allows situations to be sublimated into precious correspondence and empathy.

Then yes: the personal aspect of the mission-relationship with the world becomes manifest, intense; decisive.

The non-depersonalising contact with the Voice of the Father made Brother convinces, in the drama and even in the clash of the face-to-face relationship.

The one not distant and indistinct Person who knows where to lead me and pulses within conveys that sense of participation and complicity that makes the soul so mysteriously sure of its most palpitating inclinations. Thus finally transforming a conformist and intimidated life into a dense, complete and shining adventure - one that overcomes obstacles, mentalities and conditioning that would make it pale into extinction.

We need a Presence that in the joy of togetherness opens, invites, gives taste; shatters the tension of deserving and fulfilling expected performance.

A Person who allows us to feel heard, understood and cared for, and who in the warmth of this Nest makes of ourselves a human sign with a Purpose of Love.

What is needed is Someone who transforms the meaning of everyday actions, even minute or apparently banal ones, into intimacy and Dialogue.

A Core of Sharing where we find support - not sentences - for our incessant transmigration: from the spiritualisations that 'elevate' to the humanisation that brings us closer.

And establish us at root. And transmits smiles to the soul.From the ancient religious sense to the Fedenovella? A question of Person.

To internalise and live the message:

The usual and at hand, or the best and that fits you?

What and Whom do you choose?

Do you see deep? Do you choose beyond boundaries?

«We have believed and then known»

On this passage we have a beautiful commentary by St Augustine, who says, in one of his sermons on John 6: "Do you see how Peter, by the grace of God, by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, understood? Why did he understand? Because he believed. You have words of eternal life. You give us eternal life by offering your [risen] body and blood [Yourself]. And we have believed and known. It does not say: we have known and then believed, but we have believed and then known. We believed in order that we might know; for if we had wanted to know before we believed, we could neither know nor believe. What have we believed and what have we known? That you are Christ the Son of God, that you are eternal life itself, and in flesh and blood you give us what you yourself are' (Commentary on the Gospel of John, 27, 9). So said St Augustine in a sermon to his believers.

[Pope Benedict, Angelus 26 August 2012]