5th Easter Sunday (year A)  [3 May 2026]

First Reading from the Acts of the Apostles (6:1-7)

Paradoxically, the problem facing the early Christian community arose from its very success. In those days, as the number of disciples grew, the Greek-speaking believers began to grumble against the Hebrew-speaking ones (Acts 6:1). The numbers were growing so rapidly that maintaining unity became difficult. Every expanding group faces the same question: how to remain united when numbers grow? Numerous, and therefore diverse. In truth, the seeds of this difficulty were already present on the morning of Pentecost. In Jerusalem lived devout Jews from every nation under heaven (cf. Acts 2:5). On that day there were three thousand conversions, and others followed in the months and years that followed. All were Jews, for the question of non-Jews arose only later, but many were Jews who had come to Jerusalem on pilgrimage from all over the Empire. These were the Jews of the Diaspora known as Hellenists: their mother tongue was neither Hebrew nor Aramaic, but Greek, which was then the common language throughout the Mediterranean. Thus, the young community immediately found itself facing the ‘challenge of languages’. And we know that the language barrier is much more than a mere difficulty of translation: a different mother tongue means different cultures, customs, and ways of understanding life and solving problems. If language is a net cast over the reality of things, a different language is another net, and the meshes rarely coincide. The practical problem that arose in Jerusalem was the care of widows. Looking after them was a rule of the Jewish world and the community did so willingly, but those managing the service, recruited from the majority Hebrew-speaking group, tended to favour the widows of their own group, whilst the Greek-speaking widows were neglected. These complaints could only grow more bitter, until they reached the ears of the apostles. Their reaction can be summarised in three points. First: they summoned the entire assembly of disciples because every decision is taken in plenary session, given that the Church functions synodally: Why then has this been lost? Second: they recalled the objective. It is a matter of remaining faithful to three demands of apostolic life: prayer, the ministry of the Word and the service of the brothers and sisters. Third: they are not afraid to propose a new organisation. Innovation is not unfaithfulness; on the contrary: faithfulness demands the ability to adapt to new circumstances. Being faithful does not mean remaining fixated on the past, for example by entrusting all tasks to the Twelve simply because they were chosen by Jesus. Being faithful means keeping one’s eyes fixed on the goal, and the goal, as the evangelist John writes, is ‘that they may be one so that the world may believe’ (Jn 17:21). Accepting diversity is the challenge facing every growing community, and when conflicts arise, splitting up is not the best solution; this is why the apostles do not consider dividing the community in two, with Greeks on one side and Jews on the other. The Holy Spirit has brought about numerous and diverse conversions and now inspires the apostles to organise themselves differently to deal with the consequences. The Twelve therefore decide to appoint men capable of taking on the task of serving at the tables, since that is where the problem arises: “Brothers, choose seven of you, men respected by all, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, and we will entrust this task to them. We, for our part, will devote ourselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word’. The seven chosen all bear Greek names: they were therefore almost certainly part of the group of Greek-speaking Christians, from whom the complaints had come. Thus a new institution is born: these servants of the community do not yet have a title, and the text does not use the word ‘deacon’. Although we must not be too quick to identify these men with today’s deacons, one thing remains clear: in every age, the Spirit inspires innovations that are indispensable for faithfully fulfilling the Church’s various missions and priorities. 

Responsorial Psalm (32/33)

I shall begin where the reading of this psalm ends, for there lies a key to understanding the whole. I return to the penultimate verse, verse 18: “The Lord’s eye is on those who fear him, on those who hope in his love.” Here we discover a beautiful definition of “fear of God”: to fear the Lord is simply to place our hope in his love. The believer, in the biblical sense, is a person full of hope; and if they are so, whatever happens, it is because they know that ‘the earth is full of his love’, as verse 5, which we have just heard, says. Knowing that the Lord’s loving gaze is always upon us is the source of our hope. I should point out that, in the Hebrew text, the name ‘Lord’ is the one revealed to Moses in the burning bush: the four-letter name YHWH which, out of respect, Jews never pronounce, and which means something like ‘I am, I will be with you, from everlasting to everlasting, in every moment of your history’. This name reminds Israel of the care with which God surrounded his people throughout the Exodus. If we translate it as ‘God watches over’, this vigilance is well conveyed. Thus we understand the following verse: ‘to deliver him from death and sustain him in times of famine’ (v. 19). These are allusions to the exodus from Egypt: by leading the people across the sea on dry ground behind Moses, the Lord saved the people from the certain death decreed by the Pharaoh; then, by sending manna from heaven in the desert, he truly nourished his people in times of famine. Then praise flows spontaneously from the heart of those who have experienced God’s care: “Rejoice, O righteous ones, in the Lord; for the upright, praise is beautiful” (v. 1). The expression “the upright” may surprise us, yet it is common in the Bible. One is considered upright/righteous who enters into God’s plan, who is united with God like a well-tuned musical instrument. This is said of Abraham: Abraham believed in the Lord, and it was credited to him as righteousness (Gen 15:6). He had faith, that is, he trusted in God and in his plan. Therefore, we could translate “righteous men”, in Hebrew hassidim, as “the men of the Covenant”, or “the men of God’s merciful plan”: those who have accepted the revelation of God’s benevolence and respond to it by adhering to the Covenant. These titles, “righteous men” and “upright men”, do not denote moral qualities, for the hassid is a man like any other, a sinner like any other, but he lives within the Lord’s Covenant; he lives in trust in the faithful God. And since he has discovered the God of tenderness and faithfulness, quite logically he lives in praise: “Rejoice in the Lord, you righteous; praise is fitting for the upright.” This call to praise was the entrance hymn of a liturgy of thanksgiving. We note in passing an indication of how the psalms were performed and of at least one of the instruments used in the Temple of Jerusalem: this psalm was probably intended to be accompanied by a ten-stringed harp. Singing a new song to the Lord does not mean a song never heard before, but a new song in the sense that words of love, even the most familiar ones, are always new. When lovers say ‘I love you’, they are not afraid to repeat the same words, and yet the wonder is that that song is always new. One more note: “The word of the Lord is upright, and all his works are trustworthy” (v. 4). Contrary to appearances, these are not two separate statements, one concerning the word of God and the other concerning his works, because in the Bible the Word of God is already an act in progress: “God said, and it was done,” repeats the account of creation in the first book of Genesis. It is no coincidence that this psalm has twenty-two verses, corresponding to the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet: it is a tribute to the Word of God, as if to say that it is the whole of our life, from A to Z. And it is no empty compliment, for Israel recognises that from God’s first word to his people, Israel has simultaneously experienced how the promised Word of liberation is, at the same time, already God’s liberating intervention: in every age, the Word of God calls to freedom, and is at the same time a divine force acting within humanity to secure freedom from all idolatry and all slavery. Finally: “He loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of the Lord’s love” (v. 5). Here the vocation of the whole of creation is described: God is love, and the earth is called to be a place of love, righteousness and justice. Remember the prophet Micah: ‘O man, it has been taught to you what is good and what the Lord requires of you: to do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God’ (Mic 6:8).

Second Reading from the First Letter of Saint Peter the Apostle (2:4–9)

In Hebrew, the same verb is used to mean ‘to build a house’, ‘to found a family’ and ‘to found a society’. For this reason, even in the Old Testament, the prophets readily used the language of building to speak of human society. Isaiah, for example, devised a parable: he compared the kingdom of Jerusalem to a building site (Isaiah 28:16–17). On that site there was a remarkable block of stone that was meant to become the cornerstone of the building, but the architects scorned that block and preferred to use stones of poor quality. This was a way of accusing the authorities of abandoning true values to build society on false ones. Over time, it became customary to apply the term ‘cornerstone’ to the Messiah: he would be able to take over and restore God’s building site. Peter, in turn, develops this comparison to speak of Christ. Jesus, the Messiah, is truly the most precious stone that God has placed at the centre of the building; and all people are called upon to become stones in this spiritual edifice. Those who agree to become one with him are integrated into the structure, becoming supporting elements themselves. But of course this is a choice to be made, and people may also choose the opposite path, that is, to reject the project and even sabotage it. Then everything happens for them as if the keystone were not at the heart of the building: it has remained on the ground, an admirable block but a hindrance on the building site. The stone rejected by the builders has become the cornerstone, a stumbling block and a stone of offence (cf. 1 Pet 2:7–8). Our Baptism was the moment of choice. Since then, we have been integrated into the building of what Peter calls the spiritual temple, as opposed to the stone temple in Jerusalem where animal sacrifices were offered. From the beginning of history, humanity has sought to reach God by worshipping him in the way it believes is worthy of him. Along its journey, the chosen people discovered the true face of God and learnt to live within his Covenant. Little by little, in the light of the prophets’ teaching, it was discovered that the true temple of God is humanity itself, and that the only worship worthy of him is love and service to our brothers and sisters, and no longer animal sacrifices. But this places a tremendous responsibility upon us: the temple in Jerusalem was the sign of God’s presence among his people. Now, the sign of God’s presence visible to the world is us, the Church of Christ. Peter’s words then resound as a vocation: “Like living stones, you too are being built into a spiritual house” (1 Pet 2:5). Peter distinguishes between those who entrust themselves to Christ and those who reject him. ‘Believing’ and ‘rejecting’ are two acts of free will, and those who do not accept Christ, Peter affirms, stumble because they do not obey the Word. This was their destiny (cf. v. 5); this phrase speaks only of the consequence of their free choice, not of predestination by God’s arbitrary decision: the liberating God can only respect our freedom. At the presentation of Jesus in the temple, Simeon had announced to Joseph and Mary: ‘He is here for the fall and the rising again of many in Israel’ (cf. Lk 2:34). Simeon does not speak of a necessity willed by God, but of the consequences of Jesus’ coming. In fact, his presence was for some an occasion of total conversion, whilst others hardened their hearts. Peter concludes: ‘ But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood” (1 Pet 2:9). On the day of our Baptism, grafted into Christ, we became members of Christ, the one true “priest, prophet and king”. United with him, we have become part of his holy people; we have acquired a new citizenship, that of the people of God, and our national anthem is now the Alleluia. Peter concludes by telling us that we are charged with proclaiming the marvellous works of the One who has called us out of darkness into his marvellous light.

From the Gospel according to John (14:1–12)

If Jesus begins by saying, ‘Do not let your hearts be troubled’ (Jn 14:1), it is because the disciples were not hiding their anguish, and one can understand why. They knew they were surrounded by general hostility and sensed that the countdown had begun. This anguish was compounded, at least for some of them, by a terrible disappointment: “We had hoped that he would be the one to redeem Israel” (from the Romans), the disciples of Emmaus would say (cf. Lk 24:21). The apostles shared this political hope; now their leader is about to be condemned and executed, and their illusions are coming to an end. Jesus sets about redirecting their hope: he will not fulfil the expectations his miracles have raised; he will not lead the national uprising against the occupier; on the contrary, he will not cease to preach non-violence. The liberation he has come to bring lies on another plane: he does not wish to fulfil his people’s earthly and political expectation of the Messiah, but to make them understand that he is the one who has always been awaited. He begins by appealing to their faith, that is, to that fundamental attitude of the Jewish people which we read of in all the psalms, for hope can rest firmly only on faith. This is why Jesus returns repeatedly to these words: ‘believe’, ‘let not your hearts be troubled (for) you believe in God’. Yet it is one thing to believe in God—and this is a given—and quite another to believe in Jesus, precisely at the moment when he seems to have definitively lost the battle. For his contemporaries, to accord Jesus the same faith as God required a tremendous leap, and Jesus seeks to help them perceive the profound unity existing between the Father and himself. Here we have the second key theme of this text: “I am in the Father and the Father is in me” (a phrase he repeats twice). And then: “Whoever has seen me has seen the Father”, and this last phrase resonates in a very special way in the light of what will happen a few hours later, for the revelation of the Father reaches its climax when Jesus dies on the cross. As he dies, Jesus continues to love mankind, all mankind, and even forgives his executioners. It would be necessary to dwell on every sentence of this final conversation between Jesus and his disciples, indeed on each of the words laden with the whole of biblical experience: to know, to see, to abide, to go towards. Every word is at the same time an event, a ‘work’. When he says: ‘I am’, to Jewish ears this clearly evokes God himself, and he dares to say: “I am the way, the truth and the life”, identifying himself with God himself. And at the same time, the Father and he are two distinct persons, for Jesus says: “I am the way” (implied: to the Father). No one comes to the Father except through me. Another way of saying “I am the way” or “I am the gate”, as in the discourse on the Good Shepherd. And when we are united with him, the divine plan of our solidarity in Jesus Christ with the whole of humanity is realised. This is truly a mystery, and we struggle greatly to grasp it, yet it is the very essence of God’s merciful plan, which St Augustine calls the “total Christ”. This solidarity in Jesus Christ is present throughout the New Testament. Paul, for example, evokes it when he speaks of the New Adam and also when he says that Christ is the head of the Body of which we are the members. “The whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth until now” (Rom 8:22): the birth of which he speaks is precisely that of the Body of Christ. Jesus himself very often used the expression ‘Son of Man’ to announce the definitive victory of the whole of humanity gathered together as one man. If we take seriously the expression ‘No one comes to the Father except through me’ and if we consider the solidarity existing among all men in Jesus Christ, then we must also say that Christ does not go to the Father without us. This is the meaning of these words of Jesus: “Where I am, there you will be too”, and again, “When I have gone and prepared a place for you, I will come again and take you to be with me”. Paul affirms this in another way when he writes: “Nothing can ever separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus” (Rom 8:39). Jesus concludes with a solemn promise: “Whoever believes in me will do the works that I do.” After all that Jesus has just said about himself, the term “works” certainly does not refer solely to miracles, for throughout the Old Testament, when the word “work” is used in reference to God, it always refers to God’s great work of liberating his people. This means that the disciples are now associated with the work undertaken by God to free humanity from all physical or moral bondage. This promise of Christ encourages us to believe that, even though history shows the enduring presence of many forms of slavery, this liberation is possible and will come to pass. It is up to each of us to make our own contribution.

+Giovanni D’Ercole

Generators from below

(Jn 14:21-26)

The Father's love unites us to Christ through a call that manifests itself wave by wave. And on that path the Son reveals himself.

«My commandments» [v.21: subjective genitive] is a theological expression designating the very Person of the Risen One in act.

A 'Person' unfolded in the history of mankind thanks to his mystical Body: the variegated People of God, whose versatility is an added value - not a limitation or contamination of purity.

Of course, Love is the only reality that cannot be "commanded".

But Jesus designates and advocates it as such to emphasise the departure from the Sinai Covenant, which it summarises but replaces.

The plural form «commandments» recognises the range of the various forms of exchange and personalisation of love.

No orientation, no doctrine, no code, can ever overcome it, or conversely make it swampy.

The Apostles, conditioned by the conventional religious mentality - all catwalks - question themselves about the attitude of Jesus, who is modest and not very inclined to show off (v.22).

They do not accept a Messiah who does not impose himself on everyone's attention, who does not astonish the world, who does not shout frenzied proclamations.

The Master prefers that in his Word we recognize an active correspondence with the desire for the integral life we carry within (vv.23-24).

Indeed, in said Appeal lurks a sympathy, an understanding, an arrow, an efficient and creative vigour, which becomes Fire and personal Presence solidity.

Starting from the inside, fleeble and ringing at the same time.

In ancient forensic culture, it was named «Paraclete» (v.26) an eminent person in the assembly - today we would say a lawyer - who without saying anything placed himself next, so justifying the accused.

This attribute of the Spirit alludes to an intensity, intimate grounding and reciprocity of silent relationship that becomes a Person, and knows where to go.

A Companion who approves; who leads the heart, the character, life itself, not to the pillory, but to the full flowering of ourselves.

Experience that takes place without earthquakes, thunders and lightnings - partial - but through the action of the Spirit that internalizes, accompanies, nourishes, updates and brings alive the interpretation of the Word (v.26).

The Message of the Gospels has a generative root that cannot be reduced to a one-sided and cumbersome experience, all codified and moralistic but empty as in sectarian situations [always struggling with themselves and the world].

Venturing into one's own Exodus, each one discovers hidden resources and an amplification of perspectives that dilate and complete one's being, broadening the experience of the vocational character that corresponds to her/him.

Between life on the road and the Word of God - a golden rule that gives self-confidence - an unpredictable, versatile, eclectic, non-one-way understanding is kindled, which transcends identity concatenations.

In its scope, the Recall remains identical, but over time expands awareness of its facets - precisely, integrating them.

Creator and creature [expressiveness rich and not already ratified ones] do not authentically externize themselves in a fixed, sanctioned manner, and with reference to a doctrine-discipline code, but in the surplus freedom of life.

A plausible reality in the Faith’s adventure, but one that would drive any outward religion crazy.

[Monday 5th wk. in Easter, May 4, 2026]

Generators from below

(Jn 14:21-26)

The Father's love unites us to Christ through a call that manifests itself wave after wave. And on that path the Son himself is revealed, also through genuine community life.

The Gospel passage reflects the question-and-answer catechesis typical of the Johannine communities of Asia Minor, committed to questioning: this time the theme of misunderstanding is introduced by Judas, not Iscariot.

Even the Jews had been waiting for an eloquent public outing to believe in the divine status of Jesus of Nazareth. Perhaps such an unassuming manifestation could only generate scepticism.

How is it that in Him one remains in the sphere of concealment, and His own intimates do not stir up reactions? Wouldn't an open and sensational twist be appropriate?

And why experience the difficulties from within? Then, why were relationships regarded as 'important' regarded with increasing aversion, extraneous, irritating?

Well, Christ's vulnerable messianism - seemingly defensive, avoidant - is not the kind to dispel doubts.

He remained bare. So he did not lose his own naturalness; as if he had perceived the danger of lofty aberrations, all external.

The authentic Messiah protected his identity, his human, spiritual, missionary character. In this way he avoided all the excessive glorious titles provided for in the theological culture of ancient Israel.

The life of Faith in us also continues invisibly: not surrounded by outward miracles and strong feelings; rather, innervated with convictions (recognised in themselves).

In the time of the new relationship with God and the brethren, the old concept of the Lord's Anointed One who observes and imposes the Law of the Chosen People (forcefully) on all nations has no relevance.

In whatever condition and latitude, God is always present and at work, starting from the core, to bring us back to the breath of being.

The Father, the Son, and believers, form in mutual acquaintance a wide-meshed circle of love, reciprocity and obedience, through free responses that are neither stereotypical nor paralysing.

Not parcelled out on details and casuistry, but centred on fundamental options.

"My commandments" [v.21: subjective genitive] is a theological expression designating the very Person of the Risen One in action.

'Person' unfolded in human history thanks to his mystical Body: the variegated People of God, whose versatility is an added value - not a limitation or contamination of purity.

Of course, Love is the only reality that cannot be 'commanded'.

But Jesus designates and advocates it as such to emphasise the departure from the Sinai Covenant, which it sums up and yet replaces.

The plural form "commandments" recognises the range of the various forms of exchange and personalisation of love.

No orientation, doctrine, code, can ever overcome it, or conversely make it swampy.

In the Gospels, love is spoken of not in terms of sentiment [an emotion subject to inflection, or one that adjusts itself to the perfections of the beloved] but as a real action, a gesture that makes the other feel free and adequate.

The People of God reflect Christ to the extent that they develop their destiny by living totally in gift, response, exchange, and overflowing in Gratuity.

All this in a way that is unprecedented for each person, for each micro- and macro-relational situation, age of life, characteristics, type of defect, or current cultural paradigm.

In short, the Lord does not like us to elevate ourselves by detaching ourselves from the earth and from our brothers and sisters: the honour due to the Father is that which we offer to his children.

So there is no need to rise by ways of ascetic observance ["ascending" as in upstairs: the lift is only descending].

It is He who reveals Himself, offering Himself to us: this is His joy.

He comes down from "heaven".

He manifests Himself in ourselves and within the folds of history, manifesting His desire to merge with our life (v.21) in order to increase it, complete it, and enhance its capacities [in qualitative terms].

The Apostles, conditioned by the conventional religious mentality - all catwalks - question Jesus' attitude, modest and little inclined to spectacle (v.22).

They do not accept a Messiah who does not impose himself on everyone's attention, who does not astonish the world, who does not shout wild proclamations.

The Master prefers that in his Word we recognise an active correspondence with the desire for integral life that we carry within (vv.23-24).

Such a Logos-event must be assumed in being, as a Call distinct from the commonplaces of the widespread, conformist thought of others.

Indeed, in said Call there lurks a sympathy, an understanding, an arrow, an efficient and creative vigour, which makes itself Fire and solidity of personal Presence, starting from within - at the same time faint and ringing.

In ancient forensic culture, 'Paraclete' (v.26) was said to be the eminent personage of the assembly - today we would say a kind of lawyer - who without saying anything stood beside to justify the accused.

[The latter could be guilty, but deserving of pardon; however, he needed a kind of public guarantor to guarantee his fate. That is, he could be innocent, but unable or incapable of finding witnesses in his favour to exonerate him...]

Such an attribute of the Spirit alludes to an intensity, intimate grounding and reciprocity of silent Relationship that becomes Person, and knows where to go.

Companion who approves; who leads heart, character, life itself, not to the pillory, but to the full flowering of ourselves.

Thanks to His support, we are not enchanted by lofty roles, strong words; formulas, impressions, tumultuous feelings: we enter into the demanding, fulfilled depths of Love.

We widen the field. We welcome a different guiding image, one that presses in and takes us by surprise, but subtly. It does not reproach or scold us.

It happens without earthquakes, thunders and thunderbolts - partial - but through the action of the Spirit that internalises, accompanies, nourishes, updates and brings alive the interpretation of the Word (v.26).

The Message of the Gospels has a generating root that cannot be reduced to a one-sided and cumbersome experience; all codified and moralistic but empty as in sectarian situations, always struggling with themselves and the world. 

Venturing into one's own Exodus, each one discovers hidden resources and an amplification of perspectives that dilate and complete one's being, broadening the experience of the vocational character that corresponds to it.

Between life on the road and the Word of God - the golden rule that instils self-esteem - an unpredictable, versatile, eclectic, non-one-way understanding is kindled, which transcends the concatenations of identity.

In its scope, the Recall remains identical, but over time expands awareness of its facets - indeed, integrating them.

Richly expressed and not already ratified, Creator and creature do not authentically externise themselves in a fixed, sanctioned manner, and in reference to a doctrine-discipline code, but in the surplus freedom of life.

Even today, as new needs and questions arise, there is an appropriate overabundance of new answers - at last also from the Magisterium.

Plausible in the adventure of Faith, but which would drive any external religion crazy.

To internalise and live the message:

Do you recognise the Work of the Spirit or reject it as a nuisance? What strikes you about the new Magisterium?

Do you find this approach in the Proclamation, Catechesis, Animation, Pastoral Care and in your own Way?

Here, it is Jesus himself who promises that he will ask the Father to send his Spirit, defined as "another Paraclete" (Jn 14: 16), a Greek word that is equivalent to the Latin "ad-vocatus", an advocate-defender. The first Paraclete is in fact the Incarnate Son who came to defend man from the accuser by antonomasia, who is Satan. At the moment when Christ, his mission fulfilled, returns to the Father, he sends the Spirit as Defender and Consoler to remain with believers for ever, dwelling within them. Thus, through the mediation of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, an intimate relationship of reciprocity is established between God the Father and the disciples: "I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you", Jesus says (Jn 14: 20). However, all this depends on one condition which Christ imposes clearly at the beginning: "If you love me" (Jn 14: 15), and which he repeats at the end: "He who obeys the commandments he has from me is the man who loves me; and he who loves me will be loved by my Father. I too will love him and reveal myself to him" (Jn 14: 21). Without love for Jesus, which is expressed in the observance of his commandments, the person is excluded from the Trinitarian movement and begins to withdraw into himself, losing the ability to receive and to communicate God.

[Pope Benedict, homily 27 April 2008]

2. It may not always be conscious and clear, but in the human heart there is a deep nostalgia for God. St. Ignatius of Antioch expressed this eloquently: “There is in me a living water that murmurs within me: 'Come to the Father'” (Ad Rom.7). “Lord, show me your glory”, Moses begged on the mountain (Ex 33:18).

Since the Incarnation, there has been a human face in which it is possible to see God. From that moment on, a new relationship has been possible between the Creator and the creature: that of a son with his Father.

By conveying to us the direct testimony of the life of the Son of God, the Gospel of John shows us the path to follow in order to know the Father. The invocation “Father” is the secret, the breath, the life of Jesus.

[Pope John Paul II, Message for the 14th World Youth Day]

"If the encounter with God in all things is not an 'empirical eureka'," I say to the Pope, "and if it is therefore a journey that reads history, mistakes can also be made...".

"Yes, in this seeking and finding God in all things there always remains an area of uncertainty. There has to be. If a person says that he has met God with total certainty and is not touched by a margin of uncertainty, then it is not good. For me, this is an important key. If one has the answers to all the questions, then that is proof that God is not with him. It means that he is a false prophet, who uses religion for himself. The great leaders of God's people, like Moses, always left room for doubt. One must leave room for the Lord, not for our certainties; one must be humble. There is uncertainty in all true discernment that is open to the confirmation of spiritual consolation'.

"The risk in seeking and finding God in all things is therefore the desire to make things too explicit, to say with human certainty and arrogance: 'God is here'. We would only find a god to our measure. The correct attitude is the Augustinian one: seek God in order to find him, and find him in order to always seek him. And we often search by trial and error, as we read in the Bible. This is the experience of the great Fathers of the faith, who are our model. We must reread chapter 11 of the Letter to the Hebrews. Abraham set out without knowing where he was going, by faith. All our ancestors of faith died seeing the promised goods, but from afar.... Our life is not given to us as an opera booklet in which everything is written, but it is going, walking, doing, seeking, seeing... One must enter into the adventure of seeking the encounter and letting oneself be sought and encountered by God"[...]

"If the Christian is restorationist, legalist, if he wants everything clear and sure, then he finds nothing. Tradition and the memory of the past must help us to have the courage to open up new spaces to God. Those who today always seek disciplinary solutions, those who tend in an exaggerated manner towards doctrinal 'security', those who obstinately seek to recover the lost past, have a static and regressive vision. And in this way, faith becomes one ideology among many. I have a dogmatic certainty: God is in the life of every person. Even if a person's life has been a disaster, if he is destroyed by vices, drugs or whatever, God is in his life. One can and must seek Him in every human life. Even if a person's life is a soil full of thorns and weeds, there is always a space where good seed can grow. One must trust in God".

[Pope Francis, Interview by A. Spadaro, in L'Osservatore Romano 21/09/2013]

(Jn 14:1-12)

The Other Way in the ministerial Church

(Jn 14:1-6)

«Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God and believe in me» (v.1).

Jesus invites to Faith in Him because He was condemned as a sinner, deranged and cursed, by the very teachers of the things of God.

His proposal for a «Way» breaks away from the illusory plots of religion without Exodus.

Disciples must learn to experience physical separation from the Master. And by process of love, as on a road trodden on foot, in Him continue to reach sisters and brothers.

Now they know the Father’s descending «Way»: the Person of Christ is all that mankind needs for a life redeemed from the subordination, the fears, the lies of ancient religion.

The itinerary is not individualistic and isolated. Nor does Jesus return surrounded by ostentation and power, for He never ‘left’: in the Spirit, He never separated himself.

He is the motor and motive, the force of the concrete journey, the dynamic principle that accompanies, guides and surpasses; as well as the purpose [not external].

He manifests himself and lives in the inner Mystery within us, not at the end of time or in a location (v.5).

The Incarnation continues in unique, ever new ways, which are identified in personal paths and especially in the relationship of working Faith.

Under the image of the House [almost divided into spaces] the Lord alludes to the new condition of Life and complete Communion with the Father.

The popular figure of the afterlife was linked to a certain number of "places" in which the devoted people would be housed, accommodated.

In this archetypal configuration, the Faith of believers introduces a different kind of representation, which fulfils and exceeds the ancient promises - no longer anchored in the usual distinction between vices and virtues.

Women and men have a «place» (v.2) [task, mission] already ready and assured: there we will be with the Son who Comes.

In the House of the Father there are many places (v.2), that is - according to sensitivity, inclination and history - various ways to serve the brethren; to fulfil oneself, to weave community relationships, to expand the presence of the Risen One.

The conscious and ministerial Church broadens the horizon of holiness and the apostolate.

We are all called to become fully involved members, collaborators in the work of salvation. Protagonists in the activities of the People of God, valuing each one - this is the Victory of the Son.

And the Assembly that reflects Christ is the outgoing one. A Fraternity that is not self-congratulatory about its static goals, but is moving [precisely: «Way»].

On this journey, it learns and deepens in an uninterrupted, increasing, growing way, the language of gratuitousness Love that gives spontaneously, without intimate dissociations or artificial conflicts.

Thus, the Church itself, with its wide range of collaborators (of equal dignity) is not afraid to question itself. On the contrary, from Exodus to Exodus it experiences, concretises and deepens its knowledge of the Father. Almighty because He provides for his lesser sons.

«Truth» [of God]: He is «Faithful».

Precisely on this orientation, here we are introduced to the decisive discovery: it is the Father himself who dilates, strengthens inclinations, our existential bearing. To the point of recovering opposites.

God does not vampirize us, but rather expands existence, transmitting the fullness of being multifaceted; thus communicating his own «Life».

The end of God's invisibility.

The Other Way, Truth, Life, in the human dimension

(Jn 14:6-14)

Divine hands have wounds of love, they are not claws. They tread the alternative «way» of work, of building and welcoming; a truly special, disinterested, unreflected trajectory.

Hands marked by what one wishes for the world: open, not clenched into a fist - if anything, with that gentle grip that says: «I am with You».

They accompany «the way» that makes the weak become strong. «Way» that expands our horizon to conquer the land of Freedom.

He is «the Truth». We know what happens to news when it passes from mouth to mouth: it becomes defaced.

But united with the True Person - intertwined with his story - we encounter ourselves, we know the divine ‘Fidelity’ [‘Truth’], we choose substance instead of conventional, conformist or volatile ideas (we would become external).

«I Am the Life». The Father expands and enhances inclinations, our existential reaching; He does not vampirize us as if He were the one who needs something.

He is the Totality of Being, and Source in action; springing of particular essences.

His Calling is Seed; a Root that characterizes and expands Life, making it singular, more distinctive; unique, unrepeatable; meaningful and relational.

To build an alternative society capable of creating well-being: smiles and amazement flowing out, cheering everyone up.

«Let us see the Father» (cf. vv.8-9) is the plea - often anonymous - that from the very beginning has accompanied the believers’ People, who spontaneously reveal their Lord as the Way, the Truth and the Life (v.6).

And the Church that reflects Christ is the ‘outgoing’ one, which does not become complacent about its static goals, but moves [precisely: «Way»] from Exodus to Exodus, to improve itself before correcting others.

The assembly of sons is therefore not afraid of becoming impure by frequenting the cultural and existential peripheries, because it has understood the authentic face of God.

Father, Mother, deep Core, Friend.

«Faithful» [«Truth», in the theological sense] who is not afraid to mix with earthly affairs.

He does not flee the critical scrutiny; nor does he abandon those who stray, or those who cannot bear conformist obligations, or who find themselves in penury.

Authentic community is capable of coexistence and reciprocity: that of «the Life» which shows Father and Son in act [Initiative and Correspondence].

In the Spirit, such a Family recovers each person's journey and restores wholeness, fullness of being without boundaries, even to those who have lost hope or self-esteem.

Difference with ancient religion? The Eternal is no longer revealed in the awesome power of sensational outward manifestations: fire, earthquake, thunders and lightnings.

God is not the preserve of those who show great energy.

In the hearths of Faith, the Person of Christ is made present in his being, in his troubled and real life [«in the Name»: vv.13-14].

It is in such a people that God dreams an immediate reflection of ideas, words, works; and mutual immanence.

For the efficacious event of the Father is all in the flesh of the Son. Their Dream, in the human dimension of believers.

[5th ​​Easter Sunday (year A), May 3, 2026]