Palm Sunday and the Passion of the Lord [29 March 2026]

May God bless us and may the Virgin Mary protect us! We enter Holy Week, of which Palm Sunday already gives us a foretaste of the joy and sorrow, the mystery of love and hatred that leads to death: the whole Passion, death and resurrection of Christ. To relive is not merely to remember, but also to open our hearts ever more to this mystery of salvation.

*First Reading from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah (50:4–7)

Isaiah was certainly not thinking of Jesus Christ when he wrote this text, probably in the 6th century BC, during the exile in Babylon. Let me explain: since his people were in exile, in very harsh conditions, and could easily have succumbed to discouragement, Isaiah reminds them that they are always God’s servants. And that God is counting on them, his servants (that is, his people), to bring his plan of salvation for humanity to fulfilment. The people of Israel are therefore this Servant of God, nourished every morning by the Word, yet also persecuted precisely because of their faith and capable, despite everything, of withstanding all trials. In this text, Isaiah clearly describes the extraordinary relationship that unites the Servant (Israel) with his God. Its main characteristic is listening to the Word of God, ‘the open ear’, as Isaiah puts it. ‘Listening’ is a word that has a very particular meaning in the Bible: it means to trust. We usually contrast these two fundamental attitudes between which our lives constantly oscillate: trust in God, a serene surrender to his will because we know from experience that his will is always good; or mistrust, suspicion of God’s intentions, and rebellion in the face of trials—a rebellion that can lead us to believe that God has abandoned us or, worse still, that He might take some satisfaction in our sufferings.

The prophets repeat: “Listen, Israel” or: “Will you listen to the Word of God today?” And on their lips, the exhortation “listen” always means: trust in God, whatever happens. And Saint Paul explains why: We know that all things work together for good for those who love God (Rom 8:28).

From every evil, from every difficulty, from every trial, God brings forth good; to every hatred he opposes an even stronger love; in every persecution, he grants the strength of forgiveness; and from every death, he brings forth life, the resurrection. It is a story of mutual trust. God trusts his Servant and entrusts him with a mission; in turn, the Servant accepts the mission with trust. And it is precisely this trust that gives him the strength needed to remain steadfast even in the opposition he will inevitably encounter. Here the mission is that of a witness: “So that I may sustain with my words those who are weary,” says the Servant. In entrusting him with this mission, the Lord also grants the necessary strength and the appropriate language: “The Lord God has given me the tongue of a disciple.” And even more: he himself nourishes this trust, which is the source of all boldness in the service of others: “The Lord God makes my ear attentive”, which means that listening (in the biblical sense, that is, trust) is itself a gift from God. Everything is a gift: the mission, the strength, and even the trust that makes one unshakeable. This is precisely the hallmark of the believer: to recognise everything as a gift from God. He who lives in this permanent gift of God’s strength can face anything: “I did not resist, I did not turn back.” Faithfulness to the mission received inevitably entails persecution. True prophets, those who truly speak in the name of God, are rarely appreciated during their lifetime. In concrete terms, Isaiah says to his contemporaries: hold fast. The Lord has not abandoned you; on the contrary, you are on a mission for him. Do not be surprised, then, if you are mistreated. Why? Because the Servant who truly listens to the Word of God—that is, who puts it into practice—soon becomes a thorn in the side. His very conversion calls others to conversion. Some heed this call… others reject it and, convinced of their own righteousness, persecute the Servant. And every morning the Servant must return to the source, to the One who enables him to face everything. Isaiah uses a somewhat strange expression: “I set my face like flint” to express resolve and courage. Isaiah was speaking to his people, persecuted and humiliated during the exile in Babylon; but, naturally, when one re-reads the Passion of Christ, this text stands out in all its clarity: Christ corresponds perfectly to this portrait of the Servant of God. Listening to the Word, unshakeable trust and thus the certainty of victory even in the midst of persecution: all this characterised Jesus precisely at the moment when the acclamations of the crowd on Palm Sunday marked and hastened his condemnation.

*Responsorial Psalm (21/22)

Psalm 21 (22) begins with the famous cry: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”. This phrase has often been taken out of context and interpreted as a cry of despair, whereas in reality the psalm must be read in its entirety. Indeed, after describing suffering and anguish, it ends with a great song of thanksgiving: “You have answered me! I will proclaim your name to my brothers and sisters’. The one who at first feels forsaken ultimately recognises that God has saved him and has not left him alone. Some images in the psalm seem to describe the crucifixion: ‘They have pierced my hands and my feet’, ‘they divide my garments’, ‘a band of evildoers surrounds me’. This is why the New Testament applies this psalm to the Passion of Jesus. However, the text originated in a specific historical context: the return of the people of Israel from the Babylonian exile. The exile had been like a death sentence for the people, who had risked disappearing; the return to their own land is therefore likened to the liberation of a condemned man who had narrowly escaped death. The image of the crucifixion serves to express the humiliation, violence and sense of abandonment experienced by the people, but the focus of the psalm is not suffering but rather the salvation received. The cry “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” is therefore not a cry of despair or doubt, but the prayer of one who suffers and continues to turn to God with trust. Even in the midst of trial, Israel does not cease to pray and to remember the covenant and the blessings received from the Lord. For this reason, the psalm can be likened to a votive offering: in times of danger, God’s help is invoked, and once saved, thanks are given publicly. The psalm recalls the tragedy endured, but above all proclaims gratitude towards God who has delivered his people. The final verses thus become a great hymn of praise: the poor shall be satisfied, those who seek the Lord shall praise him, and all nations shall acknowledge his lordship. God’s salvation will also be proclaimed to future generations. For this reason, in Christian tradition, this psalm has been recognised as a prophecy of Christ’s Passion: on the cross, Jesus echoes the first verse of the psalm, but just as for Israel, so too for him the final word is not suffering, but salvation and life.

*Second Reading from the Letter of Saint Paul the Apostle to the Philippians (2:6–11)

During the exile in Babylon, in the 6th century BC, the prophet Isaiah had bestowed upon the people of Israel the title of Servant of God. Their mission, amidst the trials of exile, was to remain faithful to the faith of their fathers and to bear witness to it among the pagans, even at the cost of humiliation and persecution. Only God could give them the strength to fulfil this mission. When the early Christians were confronted with the scandal of the cross, they sought to understand Jesus’ destiny and found the explanation in the words of St Paul: Jesus ‘emptied himself, taking the form of a servant’. He too faced opposition, humiliation and persecution, drawing his strength from the Father and living in total trust in Him. Although he was of divine nature, Jesus did not seek glory and honours. As Paul says, “though he was in the form of God, he did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited”. Precisely because he is God, he claims nothing for himself, but lives in gratuitous love and becomes man to show mankind the way to salvation. His exaltation is not a deserved reward, but a free gift from God. God’s logic is not that of merit or calculation, but that of grace, which is always a free gift. According to Paul, God’s plan is a plan of love: to bring humanity into his life, into his joy and into his communion. This gift is not earned, but received with gratitude. When man demands or claims, he closes himself off from grace, as happened symbolically with the sin in the Garden of Eden. Jesus, on the other hand, lives in the opposite attitude: the total acceptance of the Father’s will, what Paul calls obedience. For this reason, God exalted him and gave him the Name that is above every name: the name of Lord, a title which in the Old Testament belonged only to God. Before him “every knee shall bow”, to quote the words of the prophet Isaiah (Is 45:23). Jesus lived his entire life in humility and trust, even in the face of human violence and death. His obedience – which literally means “to place one’s ear before the word” – expresses a total and trusting listening to the Father’s will. For this reason, Paul’s hymn concludes with the Church’s profession of faith: “Every tongue shall confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father”. In Christ, the glory of God is fully manifested, that is, the revelation of his infinite love. Seeing Jesus love to the very end and give his life, one can recognise, like the centurion beneath the cross, that he is truly the Son of God.

*The Passion of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew (26:14–27:66)

Every year, on Palm Sunday, the liturgy reads the account of the Passion from one of the three Synoptic Gospels; this year it is that of Matthew. The four accounts of the Passion are similar in broad outline, but each evangelist highlights certain particular aspects. Matthew, in particular, recounts certain episodes and details that the others do not mention. First of all, Matthew is the only one to specify the exact sum for which Judas betrays Jesus: thirty pieces of silver, which according to the Law was the price of a slave. This detail shows the contempt with which men treated the Lord. Later, Judas himself, overcome with remorse, returns the money to the chief priests, saying that he has handed over an innocent man to his death. They, however, do not wish to take responsibility for it. Judas throws the coins into the temple and hangs himself; the priests use that money to purchase the potter’s field, intended for the burial of foreigners, later called the ‘Field of Blood’, thus fulfilling a prophetic word. During the trial before Pilate, Matthew recounts a unique episode: the intervention of Pilate’s wife, who sends word to her husband not to have anything to do with ‘that righteous man’, for she has suffered greatly in a dream because of him. Pilate himself appears unsettled and, seeing that the crowd is growing ever more agitated, performs the symbolic gesture of washing his hands, declaring himself innocent of that man’s blood. The crowd replies: ‘Let his blood be on us and on our children.’ Pilate then releases Barabbas and hands Jesus over to be crucified. At the moment of Jesus’ death, Matthew also recounts that the veil of the temple is torn, but adds extraordinary details: the earth trembles, the rocks split, the tombs open, and many righteous people rise and appear in the holy city after Jesus’ resurrection. Finally, Matthew highlights the authorities’ concern to guard the tomb, fearing that the disciples might steal the body and claim that Jesus has risen; this very message is what they will spread after Easter. The account highlights a great paradox: the blindness of the religious authorities, who persecute Jesus, whilst some pagans, almost unwittingly, bestow upon him the highest titles. Pilate’s wife calls him ‘righteous’, Pilate has ‘King of the Jews’ written on the cross, and even the title ‘Son of God’, initially used to mock him, ultimately becomes a true profession of faith when the Roman centurion exclaims: ‘Truly this man was the Son of God’. This confession already foreshadows the opening of salvation to the pagans and shows that Christ’s death is not a defeat, but a victory. Matthew highlights the contrast between the weakness of the condemned man and his true greatness: it is precisely in his apparent powerlessness that Jesus manifests the greatness of God, who is infinite love. And in this light, we come to understand ever more deeply the significance of Christ’s Passion, which we shall relive visually this week and in particular during the Holy Triduum: Holy Thursday, Good Friday and Holy Saturday, and above all in the outpouring of Easter joy at Christ’s Resurrection.

+Giovanni D’Ercole

I Am, and our dignity

(Jn 8:51-59)

The Gospel passage is addressed to the disciples of the Johannine communities who still hesitated to declare themselves fully of Christ.

Hunted and insulted by veterans of Jewish learning, they were founding it difficult to identify the immanence of the Eternal with a simple carpenter.

Dignity of Christ cannot be established by comparison with the most celebrated figures of salvation history: his is an eternal being, though he appears [in us] of insufficient figure.

But what he effectively communicates does not only exist in a specific place or at a specific moment in time. So he could not be an instrument for cultural claims.

His Mystery seems difficult to fathom and describe.

To express it briefly, we can refer to the paradoxical reversal of the categories «from up there» and «from down here» (cf. vv.21-30).

His is a spirituality founded on personal Faith that goes beyond the common religious sense.

In whoever keeps united with Him, the Mystery implied becomes light’s creative, yet without pretensions.

As someone who subtly has no beginning and no end, everywhere; even in the daily and modest brief, but continuous and present.

Although devoid of full-blown fame, if ‘intimates’ to the Lord, we too can become a ‘bridge’ between two worlds - without ostentation.

This teaches us to recognize «his day» (v. 56).

Here Jesus claims the divine condition, ridiculing the knowledge of the experts, position defenders only.

Ancient or new leaders always feel diminished by the sword of the Word in action.

Seed that in those who receive it, make their own, and cultivate it, transmits an indestructible power of regeneration.

Word that emanates a perspective, a rejoicing in being; new beginnings, without the cloak of descent or à la page ideas.

Those who want to break free from the land of slavery cherish this Proposal. It emancipates us from the sense of belonging at all costs, and it does not die.

Nor does he capitulate in the face of bygone or glamour power’s pitfalls.

System that despite the great promises, does not give the Eternal's quality of Life; it does not make us Allies.

The Name of God that Jesus attributes to himself indicates that He is sacrament of enlightenment.

«I Am» is not the attribute of a character to be counted in the gallery of those who have fought and paid for their ideas - fathers in faith and prophets.

The Lord is our Liberator. In him we can say: «I» - with dignity.

Now we are no longer on the leash of the slavery’s land.

We are able to express ourselves. We do not remain pawns of twilights and of narrow districts.

Such an inner Friend ‘does not die’: he also allows us to wander, but ‘knows’ where.

He unerringly ‘guides’ to destination; to the brightness of open horizons, vital because they are still raw, unsophisticated.

We are thus introduced into the knowledge of the One who is by now «coming out» of the Temple (v.59).

With the immeasurable breadth that does not weigh on the heart.

[Thursday 5th wk. in Lent, March 26, 2026]

Controversy over descent (and the abstract world)

(Jn 8:51-59)

The Gospel passage addresses the disciples of the Johannine communities who were still hesitant to declare themselves fully Christ's.

Hunted down and insulted by the veterans of Judaic learning, they found it difficult to identify the immanence of the Eternal with a mere carpenter.

Christ's dignity cannot be established by comparison with the most celebrated figures of salvation history: his is an eternal being, though he appears [in us] of insufficient figure.

But as effectively as he communicates, he does not exist only in a specific place or at a specific moment in time.

So he could not be a tool for contrived cultural claims, nor a means to accentuate elective nationalistic tares.

Its mystery seems difficult to probe and describe.

To express it briefly, we can refer it to the Appeal of precious but unsophisticated life, in the paradoxical reversal of the categories "from up there" and "from down here" (cf. vv.21-30).

His is an earthly spirituality, not an empty one - founded on the creative Love of personal Faith that surpasses the common religious sense.

And in the believer it becomes a vital forge, which becomes a reality, even a summary one; yet continuous, present.

In those who are united to Him, the implied Mystery becomes a new Person, gushing forth, majestic in its modesty; creative with light, yet unpretentious.

Like someone who subtly has no beginning and no end, everywhere.

Although lacking in overt fame, intimate with the Lord, we too can become a bridge between two worlds - without much showiness.

This teaches us to recognise "his day" (v.56).

Here Jesus claims divine status, ridiculing the knowledge of the ancient experts, who were only advocates of position.

And ignorant of their specifics - that is, of life in the Spirit - apart from some vague concordist thinking; partial, apodictic but inadequate, or extravagant.

Leaders old or new always feel diminished by the sword of the Word in action.

Seed that in those who receive it, make it their own and cultivate it, transmits an indestructible power of regeneration.

Word that emanates a perspective, a rejoicing of being; new beginnings, without the cloak of descent or à la page ideas.

He who wants to break free from the land of bondage, cherishes this Proposal. It emancipates us from the sense of belonging at all costs, and does not die.

Nor does it capitulate before the snares of ancient or glamorous power.

A system that despite its great promises does not give the quality of life of the Eternal; it does not make us Allies.

At most it locks us into the bewilderment of devotions, facades, opportunisms, fantasies.

The Name of God that Jesus attributes to Himself indicates that He is a sacrament of enlightenment.

Not a little picture to keep on the bedside table, to send kisses to [to snatch reassurance or position].

This is not the Seal He pours out.

Nor is "I Am" the attribute of a character to be counted in the gallery of those who have fought and paid for their ideas - fathers in the faith and prophets.

The Lord is our Deliverer. In Him we can say "I" with dignity.

This - although as in the Gospel passage, the snobs or the old (and logical) slickers of the worldly quarters consider the true believers to be deranged and demented.

Those who follow them unfortunately remain on the leash of the land of bondage and fail to express themselves; they remain pawns of twilight, of narrow quarters.

Such a follower will not err "track" or "manners"... only by fixed and aligned opinion.

Instead, the Inner Friend does not die: he also allows us to wander, but he knows where.

He guides infallibly to the destination.

He leads from the experience of stylistic and doctrinal hoods, all noble and out of phase, to the luminosity of open horizons, vital because they are still raw, unsophisticated.

Says the Tao Tê Ching (xix): 'Omit holiness and repudiate wisdom, and the people will gain a hundred doubles'.

Master Ho-shang Kung comments: 'Omit the regulating and creating of saints [...] return to non-acting [according to intentions or dirigisme] [...] The activities of agriculture develop the sense of community without selfishness'.

The Lord blesses and approves. Presence always unseen, deployed in every spark and distracted by manipulation.

Thus prompting one to cross conditioning cliques, and every threshold - to access further experiences of self, group, God, and neighbour outside, which becomes intimate.

Projected beyond the sacred enclosure reduced to a swamp, on the wave of his Word related to events we are introduced into the knowledge of the One who now comes out of the Temple (v.59).

From traditional or chic religiosity to personal faith.

With the boundless breadth of concrete and sovereign Abode, always successive, not weighing on the heart.

To internalise and live the message:

How do you live the "If anyone keeps my Word, he will never see death"? 

What about your relationship with those who feel they are specialised doctors?

Joy and Hope, or abstract world

"In the two readings" proposed by the liturgy today, the Pontiff was quick to point out in his homily, "there is talk of time, of eternity, of years, of the future, of the past" (Genesis 17:3-9 and John 8:51-59). So much so that precisely 'time seems to be the most important reality in the liturgical message of this Thursday'. But Francis preferred 'to take another word' which, he suggested, 'I believe is precisely the message in the Church today'. And they are the words of Jesus reported by the evangelist John: "Abraham, your father, rejoiced in the hope of seeing my day; he saw it and was filled with joy".

So today's central message is 'the joy of hope, the joy of trust in God's promise, the joy of fruitfulness'. Precisely "Abraham, in the time of which the first reading speaks, was ninety-nine years old and the Lord appeared to him and assured the covenant" with these words: "As for me, behold, my covenant is with you: you will become a father".

Abraham, Francis recalled, "had a son of twelve, thirteen years old: Ishmael". But God assures him that he will become "father of a multitude of nations". And "he changes his name". He then "goes on and asks him to be faithful to the covenant" saying: "I will establish my covenant with you and with your descendants and after you from generation to generation, as an everlasting covenant". Basically, God tells Abraham 'I give you everything, I give you time: I give you everything, you will be a father'.

Surely Abraham, the Pope said, 'was happy about this, he was full of consolation' on hearing the Lord's promise: 'Within a year you will have another son'. Of course, at those words 'Abraham laughed, the Bible says later: but how, at a hundred years a son?'. Yes, "he had begotten Ishmael at the age of eighty-seven, but at a hundred years a son is too much, you cannot understand!" And so he "laughed". But precisely "that smile, that laughter was the beginning of Abraham's joy". Here, then, is the meaning of Jesus' words re-proposed today by the Pope as the central message: 'Abraham, your father, rejoiced in hope'. In fact, "he dared not believe and said to the Lord: 'But what if at least Ishmael lived in your presence?'". He received this reply: "No, it will not be Ishmael. It will be another'.

For Abraham, therefore, "joy was full," said the Pope. But "even his wife Sarah laughed a little later: she was a little hidden, behind the curtains of the entrance, listening to what the men were saying". And 'when these envoys of God told Abraham the news about his son, she too laughed'. This, Francis reiterated, is 'the beginning of Abraham's great joy'. Yes, "the great joy: he exulted in the hope of seeing this day; he saw it and was filled with joy". And the Pope invited us to look at "this beautiful icon: Abraham who stood before God, who prostrated himself with his face to the ground: he heard this promise and opened his heart to hope and was full of joy".

And precisely "this is what these doctors of the law did not understand," Francis remarked. "They did not understand the joy of the promise; they did not understand the joy of hope; they did not understand the joy of the covenant. They did not understand." And "they did not know how to rejoice, because they had lost the sense of joy that, alone, comes from faith". Instead, the Pope explained, "our father Abraham was able to rejoice because he had faith: he was made righteous in faith". For their part, those doctors of the law "had lost faith: they were doctors of the law, but without faith!". But "more: they had lost the law! For the centre of the law is love, love for God and for one's neighbour". They, however, "had only a system of precise doctrines, which they made more precise every day that no one touched them".

They were 'men without faith, without law, attached to doctrines that also became a casuistic attitude'. And Francis also offered concrete examples: "You can pay tax to Caesar, can't you? This woman, who has been married seven times, when she goes to heaven will she be the wife of those seven?" And "this casuistry was their world: an abstract world, a world without love, a world without faith, a world without hope, a world without trust, a world without God". Precisely "for this reason they could not rejoice".

And they did not rejoice even if they had some party to enjoy themselves: so much so that, the Pope said, they must surely have "uncorked a few bottles when Jesus was condemned". But always 'without joy', indeed 'with fear because one of them, perhaps while they were drinking', must have remembered the promise 'that he would rise again'. And so "immediately, with fear, they went to the procurator to say 'please take care of this, let there be no trick'". All this because "they were afraid".

But 'this is life without faith in God, without trust in God, without hope in God', the Pope said again. "The life of these," he added, "only when they realised they were not right" did they think there was only the way left to take the stones to stone Jesus. "Their hearts were petrified". In fact, "it is sad to be a believer without joy," Francis explained, "and joy is not there when there is no faith, when there is no hope, when there is no law, but only prescriptions, cold doctrine. This is what applies'. In contrast, the Pope re-proposed "the joy of Abraham, that beautiful gesture of Abraham's smile" when he heard the promise to have "a son when he is a hundred years old". And "also Sarah's smile, a smile of hope". Because 'the joy of faith, the joy of the Gospel is the touchstone of a person's faith: without joy that person is not a true believer'.

In conclusion, Francis invited people to make Jesus' words their own: "Abraham, your father, rejoiced in the hope of seeing my day; he saw it and was filled with joy". And he asked "the Lord for the grace to be exultant in hope, the grace to be able to see the day of Jesus when we are with Him and the grace of joy."

[Pope Francis, s Marta, in L'Osservatore Romano 27/03/2015].

Hope is the expectation of something positive in the future, yet at the same time it must sustain our present existence, which is often marked by dissatisfaction and failures. On what is our hope founded? Looking at the history of the people of Israel, recounted in the Old Testament, we see one element that constantly emerges, especially in times of particular difficulty like the time of the Exile, an element found especially in the writings of the prophets, namely remembrance of God’s promises to the Patriarchs: a remembrance that invites us to imitate the exemplary attitude of Abraham, who, as Saint Paul reminds us, “believed, hoping against hope, that he would become ‘the father of many nations,’ according to what was said, ‘Thus shall your descendants be’" (Rom 4:18). One consoling and enlightening truth which emerges from the whole of salvation history, then, is God’s faithfulness to the covenant that he entered into, renewing it whenever man infringed it through infidelity and sin, from the time of the flood (cf. Gen 8:21-22) to that of the Exodus and the journey through the desert (cf. Dt 9:7). That same faithfulness led him to seal the new and eternal covenant with man, through the blood of his Son, who died and rose again for our salvation.

At every moment, especially the most difficult ones, the Lord’s faithfulness is always the authentic driving force of salvation history, which arouses the hearts of men and women and confirms them in the hope of one day reaching the “promised land”. This is where we find the sure foundation of every hope: God never abandons us and he remains true to his word. For that reason, in every situation, whether positive or negative, we can nourish a firm hope and pray with the psalmist: “Only in God can my soul find rest; my hope comes from him” (Ps 62:6). To have hope, therefore, is the equivalent of trusting in God who is faithful, who keeps the promises of the covenant. Faith and hope, then, are closely related. “Hope” in fact is a key word in biblical faith, to the extent that in certain passages the words “faith” and “hope” seem to be interchangeable. In this way, the Letter to the Hebrews makes a direct connection between the “unwavering profession of hope” (10:23) and the “fullness of faith” (10:22). Similarly, when the First Letter of Saint Peter exhorts the Christians to be always ready to give an account of the “logos” – the meaning and rationale – of their hope (cf. 3:15), “hope” is the equivalent of “faith” (Spe Salvi, 2).

Dear Brothers and Sisters, what exactly is God’s faithfulness, to which we adhere with unwavering hope? It is his love! He, the Father, pours his love into our innermost self through the Holy Spirit (cf. Rom 5:5). And this love, fully manifested in Jesus Christ, engages with our existence and demands a response in terms of what each individual wants to do with his or her life, and what he or she is prepared to offer in order to live it to the full. The love of God sometimes follows paths one could never have imagined, but it always reaches those who are willing to be found. Hope is nourished, then, by this certainty: “We ourselves have known and believed in the love that God has for us” (1 Jn 4:16). This deep, demanding love, which penetrates well below the surface, gives us courage; it gives us hope in our life’s journey and in our future; it makes us trust in ourselves, in history and in other people. I want to speak particularly to the young and I say to you once again: “What would your life be without this love? God takes care of men and women from creation to the end of time, when he will bring his plan of salvation to completion. In the Risen Lord we have the certainty of our hope!” (Address to Young People of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, 19 June 2011).

Just as he did during his earthly existence, so today the risen Jesus walks along the streets of our life and sees us immersed in our activities, with all our desires and our needs. In the midst of our everyday circumstances he continues to speak to us; he calls us to live our life with him, for only he is capable of satisfying our thirst for hope. He lives now among the community of disciples that is the Church, and still today calls people to follow him. The call can come at any moment. Today too, Jesus continues to say, “Come, follow me” (Mk 10:21). Accepting his invitation means no longer choosing our own path. Following him means immersing our own will in the will of Jesus, truly giving him priority, giving him pride of place in every area of our lives: in the family, at work, in our personal interests, in ourselves. It means handing over our very lives to Him, living in profound intimacy with Him, entering through Him into communion with the Father in the Holy Spirit, and consequently with our brothers and sisters. This communion of life with Jesus is the privileged “setting” in which we can experience hope and in which life will be full and free! 

[Pope Benedict, Message for the L World Day of Prayer for Vocations, 21 April 2013]

Christ says: "Before Abraham was, I am" (John 8:58). He does not say: "I was", but "I am", that is, from everlasting, in an eternal present. The Apostle John in the prologue of his Gospel writes: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God: all things were made through him, and without him nothing was made of all that exists" (John 1:1-3). So that 'before Abraham', in the context of Jesus' polemic with the heirs of Israel's tradition, who appealed to Abraham, means: 'well before Abraham' and is illuminated by the words of the prologue of the Fourth Gospel: 'in the beginning was with God', that is, in the eternity proper to God alone: in the eternity shared with the Father and the Holy Spirit. Indeed, the Quicumque Symbol proclaims: "And in this Trinity nothing is before or after, nothing greater or less, but all three persons are coeternal and coequal with one another."

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 6 November 1985].

1. "I believe . . . in Jesus Christ, his (God the Father's) only Son, our Lord; who was conceived of the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary". The cycle of catechesis on Jesus Christ, which we develop here, makes constant reference to the truth expressed in the words of the Apostles' Creed, now quoted. They present Christ to us as true God - Son of the Father - and, at the same time, as true Man, Son of the Virgin Mary. The previous catecheses have already enabled us to approach this fundamental truth of the faith. Now, however, we must seek to deepen its essential content: we must ask ourselves what true God and true Man mean. This is a reality that is revealed before the eyes of our faith through the self-revelation of God in Jesus Christ. And since it - like every other revealed truth - can only be rightly accepted through faith, what is at issue here is the 'rationabile obsequium fidei', the reasonable obedience of faith. The next catecheses, which focus on the mystery of the God Man, are intended to foster such faith.

2. We have already noted above that Jesus Christ often spoke of himself, using the title "son of man" (cf. Mt 16:28; Mk 2:28). Such a title was connected with the messianic tradition of the Old Testament, and at the same time responded to that "pedagogy of faith" to which Jesus deliberately resorted. For he wanted his disciples and listeners to come to the discovery on their own that the 'son of man' was at the same time the true Son of God. We have a particularly significant demonstration of this in Simon Peter's profession, which took place in the vicinity of Caesarea Philippi, to which we have already referred in the previous catecheses. Jesus provokes the apostles with questions and when Peter comes to the explicit recognition of his divine identity, he confirms his testimony by calling him "blessed because neither flesh nor blood has revealed it to him, but the Father" (cf. Mt 16:17). It is the Father, who bears witness to the Son, because he alone knows the Son (cf. Mt 11:27).

3. Nevertheless, in spite of the discretion to which Jesus adhered in application of that pedagogical principle of which we have spoken, the truth of his divine filiation became more and more evident by what he said, and particularly by what he did. But while for some it was an object of faith, for others it was a cause of contradiction and accusation. This manifested itself in definitive form during the trial before the Sanhedrin. The Gospel of Mark recounts (Mk 14:61-62): "The high priest questioned him, saying, 'Are you the Christ, the blessed Son of God?' Jesus answered, 'I am! And you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven'". In the Gospel of Luke (Lk 22:70) the question is formulated as follows: "'Are you then the son of God?' He answered them: 'You say so yourselves: I am'".

4. The reaction of those present is unanimous: "He has blasphemed! . . . you have heard the blasphemy . . . He is guilty of death!" (Matthew 26: 65-66). This accusation is, so to speak, the result of a material interpretation of the ancient law.

Indeed, we read in the Book of Leviticus: "Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall be put to death: the whole community shall stone him" (Lev 24:16). Jesus of Nazareth, who before the official representatives of the Old Testament claims to be the true Son of God, pronounces - according to their conviction - blasphemy. He is therefore 'guilty of death' and the sentence is carried out, though not by stoning according to Old Testament discipline, but by crucifixion, according to Roman law. Calling himself "Son of God" meant "making himself God" (cf. Jn 10:33), which provoked a radical protest from the guardians of Old Testament monotheism.

5. What eventually came to pass in the trial brought against Jesus had in fact already been threatened earlier, as the Gospels, particularly that of John, report. We read there more than once that the listeners wanted to stone Jesus, when what they had heard from his mouth sounded to them like blasphemy. They found such blasphemy, for example, in his words on the subject of the Good Shepherd (cf. John 10: 27, 29), and in the conclusion he came to on that occasion: "I and the Father are one" (John 10: 30). The Gospel account continues: "The Jews again brought stones to stone him. Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from my Father; for which of them do you wish to stone me?" The Jews answered him, 'We do not stone you for a good work, but for blasphemy, and because you, who are man, make yourself God'" (Jn 10:31-33).

6. Similar was the reaction to these other words of Jesus: "Before Abraham was, I Am" (Jn 8:58). Here too Jesus was faced with an identical question and accusation: "Who do you claim to be?" (Jn 8:53), and the answer to that question resulted in the threat of stoning (Jn 8:59).

It is therefore clear that, although Jesus spoke of himself above all as the "son of man", nevertheless the whole of what he did and taught bore witness that he was the Son of God in the literal sense of the word: that is, that he was with the Father one, and therefore: as the Father, so also was he God. Proof of the unambiguous content of this testimony is the fact that he was recognised and accepted by some: "many believed in him": (cf. e.g. Jn 8:30); and, even more, the fact that he found in others radical opposition, indeed the accusation of blasphemy with the disposition to inflict on him the punishment, provided for blasphemers by the Old Testament Law.

7. Among Christ's statements on this subject, the expression: "I Am" appears particularly significant. The context in which it is pronounced indicates that Jesus here recalls the answer given to Moses by God himself, when he is asked about his name: "I am he who am . You shall say to the Israelites: I am he that sent me to you" (Ex 3:14). Now, Christ uses the same expression "I Am" in very significant contexts. The one mentioned, concerning Abraham; "Before Abraham was, 'I Am': but not only that. Thus, for example: "If . . . you do not believe that I Am, you will die in your sins" (Jn 8:24). And again: "When you have lifted up the son of man, then you will know that I Am" (Jn 8:28), and further: "I tell you this now, before it happens, so that, when it has happened, you may believe that 'I Am'" (Jn 13:19).

This "I Am" is also found in other places in the Synoptic Gospels (e.g. Mt 28:20; Lk 24:39); but in the statements quoted above, the use of God's name, proper to the Book of Exodus, appears particularly clear and firm. Christ speaks of his paschal "elevation" through the cross and subsequent resurrection: "Then you will know that I Am". Which means: then it will be fully evident that I am the one to whom the name of God belongs. With such an expression Jesus therefore indicates that he is the true God. And even before the passion he prays to the Father like this: "All things that are mine are yours and all things that are yours are mine" (Jn 17:10), which is another way of saying: "I and the Father are one" (Jn 10:30).

Before Christ, the Word of God incarnate, let us also join Peter and repeat with the same transport of faith: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt 16, 16)

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 26 August 1987].

1. In the previous catechesis we paid particular attention to those statements in which Christ speaks of himself using the expression "I Am". The context in which these statements appear, especially in the Gospel of John, allows us to think that, in resorting to this expression, Jesus refers to the Name by which the God of the ancient covenant qualifies himself before Moses, when entrusting him with the mission to which he is called: "I am he who am . You shall say to the Israelites: I am he who sent me to you" (Ex 3:14).

Jesus speaks of himself in this way, for example in the discussion about Abraham: "Before Abraham was, I Am" (John 8: 58). Already this expression allows us to understand that "the Son of Man" bears witness to his divine pre-existence. And such a statement does not stand alone.

2. More than once Christ speaks of the mystery of his Person, and the most succinct expression seems to be this: "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world; now I leave the world again, and go to the Father" (John 16: 28). Jesus addresses these words to the apostles in his farewell discourse on the eve of the Easter events. They clearly indicate that before "coming" into the world, Christ "was" with the Father as Son. They thus indicate his pre-existence in God. Jesus makes it clear that his earthly existence cannot be separated from this pre-existence in God. Without it his personal reality cannot be correctly understood.

3. Similar expressions are numerous. When Jesus mentions his coming from the Father into the world, his words usually refer to his divine pre-existence. This is particularly clear in the Gospel of John. Jesus says before Pilate: "For this I was born, and for this I came into the world: to bear witness to the truth" (John 18: 37); and perhaps it is not without significance that Pilate later asks Him: "Where are you from?" (John 19: 9). And before that we read: "My testimony is true, because I know where I come from and where I am going" (Jn 8:14). Regarding that "where are you from?" in the nocturnal conversation with Nicodemus we can hear a significant statement: "No one has ever ascended into heaven except the Son of Man who came down from heaven" (Jn 3:13). This "coming" from heaven, from the Father, indicates the divine "pre-existence" of Christ also in relation to his "departure": "What if you saw the Son of Man ascend to where he was before?" - Jesus asks in the context of the "Eucharistic discourse" near Capernaum (cf. Jn 6:62).

4. Jesus' entire earthly existence as Messiah results from that "before" and is reconnected to it as to a fundamental "dimension" according to which the Son is "one" with the Father. How eloquent in this respect are the words of the "priestly prayer" in the Upper Room: "I have glorified you above the earth, doing the work that you gave me to do. And now, Father, glorify me before thee with that glory which I had with thee before the world was" (John 17: 4-5).

The Synoptic Gospels also speak in many places of the "coming" of the Son of Man for the salvation of the world (cf. e.g. Lk 19:10; Mk 10:45; Mt 20:28); however, John's texts contain a particularly clear reference to the pre-existence of Christ.

5. The fullest synthesis of this truth is contained in the Prologue of the Fourth Gospel. It can be said that in that text the truth about the divine pre-existence of the Son of Man acquires a further, in a certain sense definitive explication: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God: all things were made through him . . . In him was life, and the life was the light of men; the light shines in the darkness, but the darkness did not receive it" (Jn 1:1-5).

In these phrases the evangelist confirms what Jesus said of himself when he declared: "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world" (Jn 16:28), or when he prayed that the Father would glorify him with that glory that he had taken of him before the world was (cf. Jn 17:5). At the same time, the pre-existence of the Son in the Father is closely connected with the revelation of the Trinitarian mystery of God: the Son is the eternal Word, he is "God from God", of the same substance as the Father (as the Council of Nicaea expressed it in the Symbol of Faith). The Council formula precisely reflects John's Prologue: "The Word was with God and the Word was God". Affirming the pre-existence of Christ in the Father is tantamount to recognising his Divinity. To his substance, as to the substance of the Father, belongs eternity. This is what is indicated by the reference to the eternal pre-existence in the Father.

6. John's Prologue, through the revelation of the truth about the Word contained therein, constitutes as it does the definitive completion of what the Old Testament had already said about Wisdom. See, for example, the following statements: "Before the ages, from the beginning he created me; for all eternity I shall not fail" (Sir 24:9), "My creator pitched my tent and said to me: pitch your tent in Jacob" (Sir 24:8). Wisdom, of whom the Old Testament speaks, is a creature and at the same time has attributes that place her above the whole of creation: "Though unique, she can do all things; though remaining in herself, she renews all things" (Wis 7:27).

The truth about the Word, contained in John's Prologue, reconfirms in a certain sense the revelation about wisdom in the Old Testament, and at the same time transcends it in a definitive way. The Word not only 'is with God', but 'is God'. Coming into this world in the person of Jesus Christ, the Word "came among his own people", for "the world was made through him" (cf. Jn 1:10-11). He came among "his own" because he is "the true light, the one who enlightens every man" (cf. Jn 1:9). The self-revelation of God in Jesus Christ consists in this "coming" into the world of the Word, who is the eternal Son.

7. "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us; and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth" (Jn 1:14). Let us say it once again: John's Prologue is the eternal echo of the words with which Jesus says: "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world" (Jn 16:28), and of those with which he prays that the Father will glorify him with that glory that he had with him before the world was (cf. Jn 17:5). The Evangelist has before his eyes the Old Testament revelation about Wisdom, and at the same time the whole Paschal event: the departure through the cross and the resurrection, in which the truth about Christ, Son of Man and true God, became completely clear to those who were his eyewitnesses.

8. In close connection with the revelation of the Word, that is, with the divine pre-existence of Christ, the truth about Emmanuel is also confirmed. This word - which in literal translation means "God with us" - expresses a particular and personal presence of God in the world. That "I am" of Christ manifests precisely this presence already foretold by Isaiah (cf. Is 7:14), proclaimed in the wake of the prophet in Matthew's Gospel (cf. Mt 1:23), and confirmed in John's Prologue: "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us" (Jn 1:14). The language of the evangelists is multiform, but the truth they express is the same. In the synoptics, Jesus pronounces his "I am with you" particularly in difficult moments (e.g. Mt 14:27; Mk 6:50; Jn 6:20), at the time of the calmed storm, as well as in the perspective of the apostolic mission of the Church: "Behold, I am with you always, until the end of the world" (Mt 28:20).

9. Christ's expression: "I came forth from the Father and am in the world" (Jn 16:28) contains a salvific, soteriological meaning. All the evangelists manifest it. The Prologue of John expresses it in the words: "To those who . . . received him (the Word), he gave power to become children of God", that is, the possibility of being begotten of God (cf. Jn 1:12-13).

This is the central truth of all Christian soteriology, organically connected with the revealed reality of the God-Man. God became man, so that man could truly participate in God's life, could indeed become, in a certain sense, God himself. The early Fathers of the Church were already clearly aware of this. Suffice it to recall St Irenaeus, who, exhorting people to follow Christ, the only true and sure teacher, stated. "Through his immense love he made himself what we are, to give us the possibility of being what he is" (cf. St Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, V, Praef.: PG 7, 1120).

This truth opens up boundless horizons for us, in which to situate the concrete expression of our Christian life, in the light of faith in Christ, Son of God, Word of the Father.

[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 2 September 1987]

"In the two readings" proposed by the liturgy today, the Pontiff immediately pointed out in his homily, "there is talk of time, of eternity, of years, of the future, of the past" (Genesis 17: 3-9 and John 8: 51-59). So much so that precisely 'time seems to be the most important reality in the liturgical message of this Thursday'. But Francis preferred 'to take another word' which, he suggested, 'I believe is precisely the message in the Church today'. And they are the words of Jesus reported by the evangelist John: "Abraham, your father, rejoiced in the hope of seeing my day; he saw it and was filled with joy".

So today's central message is 'the joy of hope, the joy of trust in God's promise, the joy of fruitfulness'. Precisely "Abraham, at the time of which the first reading speaks, was ninety-nine years old and the Lord appeared to him and assured the covenant" with these words: "As for me, behold, my covenant is with you: you will become a father".

Abraham, Francis recalled, "had a son of twelve, thirteen years old: Ishmael". But God assures him that he will become "father of a multitude of nations". And "he changes his name". He then "goes on and asks him to be faithful to the covenant" saying: "I will establish my covenant with you and with your descendants and after you from generation to generation, as an everlasting covenant". Basically, God tells Abraham 'I give you everything, I give you time: I give you everything, you will be a father'.

Surely Abraham, the Pope said, 'was happy about this, he was full of consolation' on hearing the Lord's promise: 'Within a year you will have another son'. Of course, at those words 'Abraham laughed, the Bible says later: but how, at a hundred years a son?'. Yes, "he had begotten Ishmael at the age of eighty-seven, but at a hundred years a son is too much, you cannot understand!" And so he "laughed". But precisely "that smile, that laughter was the beginning of Abraham's joy". Here, then, is the meaning of Jesus' words re-proposed today by the Pope as the central message: 'Abraham, your father, rejoiced in hope'. In fact, "he dared not believe and said to the Lord: 'But what if at least Ishmael lived in your presence?'". He received this reply: "No, it will not be Ishmael. It will be another'.

For Abraham, therefore, "joy was full," said the Pope. But "even his wife Sarah laughed a little later: she was a little hidden, behind the curtains of the entrance, listening to what the men were saying". And 'when these envoys of God told Abraham the news about his son, she too laughed'. This, Francis reiterated, is 'the beginning of Abraham's great joy'. Yes, "the great joy: he exulted in the hope of seeing this day; he saw it and was filled with joy". And the Pope invited us to look at "this beautiful icon: Abraham who stood before God, who prostrated himself with his face to the ground: he heard this promise and opened his heart to hope and was full of joy".

And precisely "this is what these doctors of the law did not understand," Francis remarked. "They did not understand the joy of the promise; they did not understand the joy of hope; they did not understand the joy of the covenant. They did not understand." And "they did not know how to rejoice, because they had lost the sense of joy that, alone, comes from faith". Instead, the Pope explained, "our father Abraham was able to rejoice because he had faith: he was made righteous in faith". For their part, those doctors of the law "had lost faith: they were doctors of the law, but without faith!". But "more: they had lost the law! For the centre of the law is love, love for God and for one's neighbour". They, however, "had only a system of precise doctrines, which they made more precise every day that no one touched them".

They were 'men without faith, without law, attached to doctrines that also became a casuistic attitude'. And Francis also offered concrete examples: "You can pay tax to Caesar, can't you? This woman, who has been married seven times, when she goes to heaven will she be the wife of those seven?" And "this casuistry was their world: an abstract world, a world without love, a world without faith, a world without hope, a world without trust, a world without God". Precisely "for this reason they could not rejoice".

And they did not rejoice even if they had some party to enjoy themselves: so much so that, the Pope said, they must surely have "uncorked a few bottles when Jesus was condemned". But always 'without joy', indeed 'with fear because one of them, perhaps while they were drinking', must have remembered the promise 'that he would rise again'. And so "immediately, with fear, they went to the procurator to say 'please take care of this, let there be no trick'". All this because "they were afraid".

But 'this is life without faith in God, without trust in God, without hope in God,' the Pope said again. "The life of these," he added, "that only when they understood that they were not right" did they think that the only way left was to take the stones to stone Jesus. "Their hearts were petrified". Indeed, 'it is sad to be a believer without joy,' Francis explained, 'and joy is not there when there is no faith, when there is no hope, when there is no law, but only prescriptions, cold doctrine. This is what applies'. In contrast, the Pope re-proposed "the joy of Abraham, that beautiful gesture of Abraham's smile" when he heard the promise to have "a son when he is a hundred years old". And "also Sarah's smile, a smile of hope". Because 'the joy of faith, the joy of the Gospel is the touchstone of a person's faith: without joy that person is not a true believer'.

In conclusion, Francis invited people to make Jesus' words their own: "Abraham, your father, rejoiced in the hope of seeing my day; he saw it and was filled with joy". And he asked "the Lord for the grace to be exultant in hope, the grace to be able to see the day of Jesus when we are with Him, and the grace of joy."

[Pope Francis, st Marta, in L'Osservatore Romano 27/03/2015]

From religion to Faith, from barren to Beloved one

(Lk 1:26-38)

The solemnity of the moment that restores the soul to the Mystery invites a passage wave upon wave: from the Temple religion to domestic and personal Faith.

From outside to inside ourselves. From patterns to innate prophecy. Unique Promise, more subtle condition.

Faith-surrender - that of Mother - which shows the freedom and beauty of the new orientations, in the progress of the inner guiding images.

Alliance no longer for what is already known.

His Pact is all in the Opening to the Inexplicable that lives inside us. 

Intimate Eternal, which can now concretize the hope and the journey of the peoples. A turning point of authenticity, growing.

If the heart’s virgins do not impose demands, the Call by Name (from our own fibers) opens the incapable and sterile breath.

Ad coeli Reginam: silent Echo... this invisible core-Vocation is startling. And with spontaneous virtue introduces the spirit into the fruitful synergy of God himself.

Spousal Trust that re-annotate the threads of the history of salvation: and is opposed to the broad road of alliances with people "who matter".

In the intertwining between fruitfuling Initiative and welcome into the bosom, the Handmaiden is icon of the expectation and the way of each one - where what remains decisive is not the usual, predictable desire.

Vibrant Appeal that is prolonged through history, in a sort of unfolded and continuous Incarnation, thanks to the collaboration of “distant”, unstable and insignificant servants, like Mary.

Ours too, despite us still being filled of normal expectations.

To internalize and live the message:

Which Words open us to life in the Spirit and question the foreseen path?

What is our still intermediate zone, without Encounter?

How to make the invisible Seed bloom

The Tao Tê Ching (Lxi) says: «The great kingdom which held itself below is the confluence of the world; is the female of the world. The female always overcomes the male with the quiet, since she is modestly submissive. For this reason, the great kingdom which places below the small kingdom attracts the small kingdom; the small kingdom that is below the great kingdom attracts the great kingdom: one lowers to attract, the other attracts because below. […] In order for each one to obtain what he craves, it’s better for the great to keep down».

God at home, and Visits we would not expect?

Slowing down a little, we are Born.

[Annunciation of the Lord, March 25]

Mary, the Art of Perception that breaks the mould

(Lk 2:19) (Lk 1:26-38)

For a life from the authentic I to the unknown Culmination

"Now, Mary kept and treasured all - really all - these event-words, putting them together and comparing them in her heart" [sense of the Greek text].

What about her, her Son and all the others?

She wanted to understand the essential affinities - with the soul and elsewhere: the meaning of strange and simple happenings. Golden rule for us also.

In the portrait of Jesus suckling, his silence did not linger - and he did not allow himself to be demotivated: he dug.

For this she knew far more expressive things than many minds - sublime and yet incapable of breaking out of automatisms, already flooded with remarkable doctrines and traditions.

We are willingly there too, with Mary; in a culture that invades our senses and pollutes our souls with noisy opinions, with seemingly eloquent but knee-jerk models: stressful and futile.

All emphatic, impactful reproductions - but external.

Yet they overflow into the inner self, and despite glittering appearances, lock the personality into a narrow space of unhealthy habits, only to be exhibited.

Indeed, we force ourselves to run from one side to the other, often reciting prototypes. Precisely, forcibly intrigued by plans, organigrams and thoughts, even devout ones, which however become forms of personal and social trivialisation.

We are becoming accustomed to the fear of our discreet, reserved, non-gossipy, secluded, hidden side, all our own and close to the Source: in a word, custodian of the Calling by Name - which wants to pause to return to the ancient Listening of the new.

A side we do not yet know: it never has the same tone as always. It is all ours, but it hints at real encounters.

By refining our inner vision, we grasp our source and the meaning of history; and its folds - thus we can still give birth to the precious world inside and outside of us.

We do this from the intangible, which acts as the pivot of essence. And guards the Fire within.

For a stretch - ever so brief - the official pundits delude us that we are at the centre of the world.

They want to inoculate us with the false sense of protagonism and permanence that quickly fades away; in fact, they overwhelm us.

We feel the need for a rediscovery of being and essence, not dissolved in the realm of night and illusion [to have power appear, to hold back ascend dominate]. Without escapes, nor rhythms that do not belong to us.

We seek involvement, and distance.

We want to 'perceive' like Mary and like the shepherds - baffled by the religious opinions of others - to become and be reborn, and to become again. Recovering the frenzies, the surprises, the wounds; without dispersing the centre.

"Taking refuge" in a secret space was not for her a rediscovery of the self expected by all, stereotypical and adequate as always.

Rather, he expressed his being - in flight from conventional ways.

In order to live intensely, she did not wish to enter into the nomenclature - then be normal, and enslaved - rather to distance herself, but to be there. So she did not exclude anything.

She also recognised herself in those wanderers.

She would never have imagined herself as the (acting) protagonist of a tradition that placed her on pedestals, forms, solemn attributes, and constraints - the very ones that would have made her sweetly but decisively rebellious.

She did not revisit herself to bask, but rather to verify and reactivate her 'way' - which she did not want to lose: it could be overwhelmed by external opinions and buried by circumstances [impelling but without horizon].

She did not want to lose her address within common, standardised goals, losing sight of what she really was, and introducing her into the heaven of the timeless - nor did she yearn to resemble the majority, or to be above them.

The one we built for her was not her home.

Mary did not face reality and today within us [to help us look at "our" Mystery] with a conformist face; sweetened and artefactual, or intimist, swampy.

Her soul was always on the move. To know the unknowable, she would never stop - even without knowing in advance where to go.

Her character did not want the certainties of accommodation. Without wavering, even within herself she preferred to perceive and live the Passion of love.

He let himself be guided and saved, but from his own sacred centre, sanctuary of the God-Con. He who unlocks, sets us on our way, and sets us free.

She could not allow her Vocation to be covered by idols, nor by any plot, which was nevertheless unfolding.

In the 'here and now' he found his affinity from his very being as a wayfarer, who by advancing put hardship behind him.

As she developed her inner eye, she also transmuted her inner self to find the step of the Annunciation hidden in the misfits, which still led her.

Only this lasted her through the years - not the functional side.He did not dream of a quiet life, but of understanding his personal mission.

Without naivety, she questioned the meaning of her intimate callings, of the happenings, of the ways, and of her motions - alien only to the anxiety of pleasing everyone.

She wished to understand how best to fit in, moving towards the new promised land [cf. Lk 1:29: "But she was greatly troubled by the Word and wondered what greeting this was"; Lk 1:34: "How shall this be?"].

The stillness within was not uniform, but filled with the vicissitudes and unpredictable 'news'.

Never did she want to be a model: an expired identity card - plastered, dogmatic. Never an icon of privilege, and ostentatious - like a woman who extinguishes her consciousness, and makes herself identified, empty, disjointed.

In the midst of others - even the lazy, indiscreet ones - Maria let herself be, perceiving the inaudible sounds of the silence of the soul.

Notes that produced her figure and - even better - her evolution and Destiny, without disturbing her with separate stubbornness.

Removing the gaze from conformist intention.

To really exist, intensely, she changed or broke through; she recovered history but listened to the inside of herself.

Catching her own deep layers, perceiving herself in her most intimate voices, she became aware of the meaning of her life, and of the unfolding story. 

In the intervals of thought, she reactivated the energy of the 'gaze'.

And without mortification, she brought her attention to another dimension, gradually entering the Wind that ceaselessly disengaged her.

In this way, he learnt not to expect something aligned to normal intentions and predictions, nor to social and cultural ranking: he had to enter into the events, and detach himself (to contemplate their importance and depth).

Mysteriously - thus peering without doing too much - he read the 'notes', chose the right registers; he interpreted the score.

Epiphany of God in a creature completely devoid of hieratic or courtly style; rather, delicate and gypsy.

She did not rush to put things in place: she sensed 'inside' the summary life, rather than leading it and organising it, or arranging it.

He waited for his eminent Self to lead the strange, non-directed, non-voluntarist path that was unfolding, truly all eccentric and unexemplary.

She did not act to please.

We also learn in her: to see the domestic God happen, the 'visits' we would not expect; the intensity of different colours.

They then lead us to a different look into the soul as well; involved and detached.

Like the surrounding reality, Mary was not always the same.

She did not have in mind a champion to chase to the end, only to find herself chronicled in the exemplarity of others - uprooted, external, dissipated and unloaded.

Situations and emotions had value, not only and not primarily on the basis of the paradigm register - now useless - with which they were interpreted.

In the hope of things present and in their sensitive Listening, she was acquiring fluidity.

In this way, she passed unforced from the religion of the fathers to the Faith, to the risk of friendship in the unpredictable proposal of the one Father.

Retreating into the Abode of the Spirit, within a Hope that unveiled itself wave by wave, she learned to understand relationships and inner energies, unpacked.

Once listened to and assumed, they could deviate, and take precisely the unexpected path.

Step by step, the attentive eye, ear and heart also introduce us - like Mary - into a territory of suspension of closed intentions. Where the love and destiny of the Newness of God dwells.

He expanded the Vision not just from around.

Unfolding her lost self in the We, not selective, but only from her own sacred centre, the horizon also dilated in the sensation of infinity in action.

In contemplating events, she would flesh out and even reinvent the figure of the heart that had guided her there.

She still reinterpreted the expressive image of her Vocation. And it changed its destiny - not giving weight to one-sided angles.

No obligations and chiselled intentions - against the tide but natural, without the laceration of titanic efforts.

Thus even the hardships brought her closer to her Mission as Mother of the new humanity, in her Son.

And each one equally rediscovered the energy of the primordial suggestion that led him or her, so that in Meditation he or she might once again embrace the Calling that still wants to snatch him or her from the mire.

Echo of the Primal Call that is woven into the events and is already the Destination.

Witnessing every moment to be rediscovered in the "intimate and full void" to be made within, to wait for something we do not know what it is first.

Mary let herself be traced in time by unpatented Love.

Such are the Dreams of creatures totally immersed in the true passions, which grasp, anticipate and actualise the timelessness in time.He did not give up wondering what - with its many aspects - was inhabiting it and silently guiding it.

We still imagine it (v.19) 'as with eyes closed': a situation our culture often ignores.

She did not think of efficient causes: it was to rediscover otherwise her opening the door to visitors, and to each new thing to be astonished.

She was already nursing, not only her Son; at the same time she was feeding herself.

Not out of vain intimism did he rediscover the subtle Mystery nested in the different - and raw - unpredictable within and without.

Without realising it, it was already feeding the world, guarding itself.

Truly, she comes to us and in us, tending the nest of essence and history... without any semblance of banners and display cases - respecting only what happens.

Similarly, her entire Family becomes the true fruitful lady of an impossible Feast of the Announcement around - which one does not understand where it came from (Lk 1:20).

Certainly from nothing outside. Therefore decisive.

Totally adherent to circumstances and present in himself, he became completely - in the clear and spontaneous motions, even of others.

Certainly he had no people around him who could boast of screens. Just strange individuals, but who ceaselessly let their vital instincts emerge.

They too did not tell each other beforehand where to go. That is why they found themselves in an incessant pregnancy.

All they had in store was the experience of distance; often frost and rejection. 

They never knew a figure who helped them to recognise themselves completely, and to look at things from the point of view of the timelessly discovered gentleness.

Even capable of tending to the wider and more inclusive global [we would say, to the servant eternity of the angelic condition].

Instead, they were set ablaze by the everlasting Flame - that of the whole world (past, present and future) that knows how to recover and stay hidden, apart but in the cosmos - as the dawn and day of the Lord.

In the culture of the time, the condition of the spirits of the heavenly throne service, who glorified and praised God (v.20) "for all that they had heard and seen".

Faced with the domestic Church Family, in Mary and Jesus the shepherds have a decisive experience.

No longer of one-sided lack and judgement, but of rebirth in esteem; of another world, available and inclusive - of another realm, unison without uniformity.

The Mother of God is a possibility of tending to the eternal present, no longer exclusive: but like a dance, where the changing whole puts one perfectly at ease - with no tracks to follow already.

Society's oddballs, pilgrims and prairie dogs in hiding, skilled only in transhumance, had perhaps never had the ability to recognise the ecstasy of being well and intensely in the summation.

Perhaps they had never had the experience of recognising in an accurate creature their own sensitive, tender and feminine side.

Appearance that in the authentic Woman Church becomes the guardian and differently announcer [in the shaky] of the treasure chest of Life.

From the warmth of Mary and the Cradle, amidst their labyrinths, they now brought to their own secluded place a thrilling blessing, and the indestructible intimate side; even elsewhere.

To question ourselves as well.

We seek a silent soul, for an art of rebirth.

Here was Maria: she had noticed, as she meditated, that others reflexively did too.

When she carved out preparatory energies, she also arranged herself in a more balanced, fuller way for the Announcement.

He walked through life to guard and nurture new fathers and mothers of humanisation. 

Not to comment, but to intuit and dissolve; not to extinguish the dreamy side with the 'up to the mark', old.

Her realm of truthfulness that heals the I and the Thou was the heaven and earth of new powers.

Reliable virtues because they sprang from the Silence of the Way that was completely renewing her - loving contradictions. 

Because everything can now happen, regenerate; and each day bring its tide (of the unprecedented) in the presence of Spirit, without routine.

A genuine soul, devoid of pretense, can do that.

For an adventure that pushes away continuity, filled with foundational Eros; for a direct exploration to the unknown Culmination.

Mary: Slowing down a little, one is born

Those who do not follow innate intuitions, a call more radical than the self, or stunning proclamations [Lk 1:26-38. 2:8-15] do not develop their destiny, do not move; they do not set things right.

Common proclamations end up incinerating personalities.

It is true that the shepherds find nothing extraordinary or prodigious but a family reduced to an ordinary condition, which they know.

But it is that simple hearth that draws them into the new Project, and into the proclamation of its scandalous unconditional Mercy - which did not electrocute them for impurity.

Archaic religion had branded them forever: lost, despicable beings, without remedy. Now they are free from identification.They have another eye - like that of the first time. A look that will bring them one hundred per cent.

Exodus facing a defenceless image of God, they do not bother to engage in ethical discipline: it would have crumbled them.

Rather, they enjoy the wonder of a simply human reality - in a mysterious relationship of mutual recognition.

A baby in a manger, an unclean place where the beasts used to play.

It is strange that the modest sign convinces them, makes them regain esteem, and makes them evangelisers - perhaps not even assiduous evangelisers.

Like Calvary (to which it refers), the resolving Manifestation of the Eternal is a paradox.

But the affective geography of this Bethlehem devoid of conformist circuits remains intact, because it is spontaneously rooted in us.

There is a sense of immediacy, without any particular entanglement or ceremony.

The Child is not even worshipped by the now 'pure' gazes of the little, vilified prairie dogs and transhumance dogs - as, conversely, the Magi will do (Mt 2:11).

They did not even know what it meant, reflecting Eastern court ceremonials - like the kissing of red slippers.

[This is why Pope Francis rejected them, along with the ermine - after Paul VI had had the courage to lay down the pluridirigist sign of tiaras, with its three overlapping crowns; a little more intricate was the affair of the anachronistic gestatorial chair].

The wretched of the earth and the distant of the flocks are those who hear the Announcement, readily verify it, and found the new divine lineage.

People untroubled by static judgement - men in the midst of all; no longer at high altitude.

Meanwhile, Mary sought the meaning of surprises and thus regenerated, for a new way of understanding and 'being' together - to give birth also to the inner world of a whole different people of fullness.

She would put facts and Word together, to discover the common thread.

And to remain receptive; not to be swayed by the convictions of the devotional enclosures - targetted and inflexible, which would have given her no escape.

The Mother herself, though taken by surprise, prepared herself for God's eccentricity, without departing from time and her real condition.

Her figure and that of the shepherds question us, demand the courage of an answer - but after letting the same kind of inner Presences flow: worthy visitors, who are allowed to express themselves.

Like us, she too had to move from the beliefs of the fathers to Faith in the Father.

From the idea of love as reward to that of 'gift'.

From the practice of cults and closures that do not make one intimate with the Eternal at all, to the opening of the mind and the exits.

She did not achieve this without effort, but rather by enduring the resistance of her arid environment.

Jesus was indeed circumcised - a useless rite that according to custom claimed to change the Son of God into the son of Abraham.

The Good News proclaims a reversal: what religion had considered far from the Most High is very close to Him; indeed, it corresponds fully to Him.

Never before imagined.

In the Annunciations of the Gospels, the adventure of Faith is opened wide.

And the new Babe has a Name that expresses the unprecedented essence of Saviour, not executioner.

His whole story will also be fully instructive from the point of view of how to internalise uncertainties and discomforts: these 'no moments' and precariousness that teach us how to live.

Indeed, we too, like Mary, 'recognise' the presence of God in the enigmas of Scripture, in the Little One 'wrapped in bandages' - even in the ancestral echo of our inner worlds.

And we let ourselves go - we don't really know where. But so is the Infinite, the immense Secret, the inexplicable Breath, in its folds.

The wise Dream that inhabits the human knows of ancient humus, but its echo is reborn every day, in the tide of being that directs one to truly 'look', without veils.

A conformist demeanour of 'seeing things' would not solve the problem.

Sometimes, in order not to be conditioned, we need to rebuild ourselves in silence, like the Virgin; to build a kind of hermeneutic island that opens different doors, that introduces other lights.

Within her sacred circuit, the Mother of God also valorised the innate transformative energies, precisely by rooting them in the questions...

Thus returning to her primordial being and the sense of the Newborn - an image steeped in primordial sense and life-wave, dear to many cultures.

Mary entered an Elsewhere and did not leave the field of the real.

She was 'inside' her Centre, unhurried - searching for the Sun drowned in her being and which returned, emerged, resurrected; from within, it made her exist beyond.

Thus he did not allow himself to be absorbed by the conformist ideas of others or by [external] situations that wanted to break the balance.

In her veracious solitude - filled with Grace - that superior and hidden self in essence came more and more to Her. He made himself a new Dawn and guide.She did not want to live inside thoughts, knowledge and reasoning around - none capable of amplifying life - all in the hands of the drugs of procedures, dehumanising the Enchantment.

The happy magic of that Frugolo of flesh brought her Peace.

Dreams sustained and conveyed her nest and inner core - causing new life to flow from the core of her Person, and the youth of the world.

"Now Mary kept all Word-events by comparing them in her heart".

From generation to generation, the wonder evoked by this ineffable mystery never ceases. St Augustine imagines a dialogue between himself and the Angel of the Annunciation, in which he asks:  "Tell me, O Angel, why did this happen in Mary?". The answer, says the Messenger, is contained in the very words of the greeting:  "Hail, full of grace" (cf. Sermo 291: 6).

In fact, the Angel, "appearing to her", does not call her by her earthly name, Mary, but by her divine name, as she has always been seen and characterized by God:  "Full of grace - gratia plena", which in the original Greek is 6,P"D4JTµXv0,  "full of grace", and the grace is none other than the love of God; thus, in the end, we can translate this word:  "beloved" of God (cf. Lk 1: 28). Origen observes that no such title had ever been given to a human being, and that it is unparalleled in all of Sacred Scripture (cf. In Lucam 6: 7).

It is a title expressed in passive form, but this "passivity" of Mary, who has always been and is for ever "loved" by the Lord, implies her free consent, her personal and original response:  in being loved, in receiving the gift of God, Mary is fully active, because she accepts with personal generosity the wave of God's love poured out upon her. In this too, she is the perfect disciple of her Son, who realizes the fullness of his freedom and thus exercises the freedom through obedience to the Father.

In the Second Reading, we heard the wonderful passage in which the author of the Letter to the Hebrews interprets Psalm 39 in the light of Christ's Incarnation:  "When Christ came into the world, he said:  ..."Here I am, I have come to do your will, O God'" (Heb 10: 5-7). Before the mystery of these two "Here I am" statements, the "Here I am" of the Son and the "Here I am" of the Mother, each of which is reflected in the other, forming a single Amen to God's loving will, we are filled with wonder and thanksgiving, and we bow down in adoration.

What a great gift, dear Brothers, to be able to conduct this evocative celebration on the Solemnity of the Lord's Annunciation! What an abundance of light we can draw from this mystery for our lives as ministers of the Church!

You above all, dear new Cardinals, what great sustenance you can receive for your mission as the eminent "Senate" of Peter's Successor! This providential circumstance helps us to consider today's event, which emphasizes the Petrine principle of the Church, in the light of the other principle, the Marian one, which is even more fundamental. The importance of the Marian principle in the Church was particularly highlighted, after the Council, by my beloved Predecessor Pope John Paul II in harmony with his motto Totus tuus.

In his spirituality and in his tireless ministry, the presence of Mary as Mother and Queen of the Church was made manifest to the eyes of all. More than ever he adverted to her maternal presence in the assassination attempt of 13 May 1981 here in St Peter's Square. In memory of that tragic event, he had a mosaic of the Virgin placed high up in the Apostolic Palace looking down over St Peter's Square, so as to accompany the key moments and the daily unfolding of his long reign. It is just one year since his Pontificate entered its final phase, full of suffering and yet triumphant and truly paschal.

The icon of the Annunciation, more than any other, helps us to see clearly how everything in the Church goes back to that mystery of Mary's acceptance of the divine Word, by which, through the action of the Holy Spirit, the Covenant between God and humanity was perfectly sealed. Everything in the Church, every institution and ministry, including that of Peter and his Successors, is "included" under the Virgin's mantle, within the grace-filled horizon of her "yes" to God's will. This link with Mary naturally evokes a strong affective resonance in all of us, but first of all it has an objective value.

Between Mary and the Church there is indeed a connatural relationship that was strongly emphasized by the Second Vatican Council in its felicitous decision to place the treatment of the Blessed Virgin at the conclusion of the Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium.

The theme of the relationship between the Petrine principle and the Marian principle is also found in the symbol of the ring which I am about to consign to you. The ring is always a nuptial sign. Almost all of you have already received one, on the day of your episcopal ordination, as an expression of your fidelity and your commitment to watch over the holy Church, the bride of Christ (cf. Rite of Ordination of Bishops).

The ring which I confer upon you today, proper to the cardinalatial dignity, is intended to confirm and strengthen that commitment, arising once more from a nuptial gift, a reminder to you that first and foremost you are intimately united with Christ so as to accomplish your mission as bridegrooms of the Church. May your acceptance of the ring be for you a renewal of your "yes", your "here I am", addressed both to the Lord Jesus who chose you and constituted you, and to his holy Church, which you are called to serve with the love of a spouse.

So the two dimensions of the Church, Marian and Petrine, come together in the supreme value of charity, which constitutes the fulfilment of each. As St Paul says, charity is the "greatest" charism, the "most excellent way" (I Cor 12: 31; 13: 13).

Everything in this world will pass away. In eternity only Love will remain. For this reason, my Brothers, taking the opportunity offered by this favourable time of Lent, let us commit ourselves to ensure that everything in our personal lives and in the ecclesial activity in which we are engaged is inspired by charity and leads to charity. In this respect too, we are enlightened by the mystery that we are celebrating today.

Indeed, the first thing that Mary did after receiving the Angel's message was to go "in haste" to the house of her cousin Elizabeth in order to be of service to her (cf. Lk 1: 39). The Virgin's initiative was one of genuine charity; it was humble and courageous, motivated by faith in God's Word and the inner promptings of the Holy Spirit. Those who love forget about themselves and place themselves at the service of their neighbour. Here we have the image and model of the Church!

Every Ecclesial Community, like the Mother of Christ, is called to accept with total generosity the mystery of God who comes to dwell within her and guides her steps in the ways of love. This is the path along which I chose to launch my Pontificate, inviting everyone, with my first Encyclical, to build up the Church in charity as a "community of love" (cf. Deus Caritas Est, Part II).

In pursuing this objective, venerable Brother Cardinals, your spiritual closeness and active assistance is a great support and comfort to me. For this I thank you, and at the same time I invite all of you, priests, deacons, Religious and lay faithful, to join together in invoking the Holy Spirit, praying that the College of Cardinals may be ever more ardent in pastoral charity, so as to help the whole Church to radiate Christ's love in the world, to the praise and glory of the Most Holy Trinity. Amen!

[Pope Benedict, homily with the new cardinals 25 March 2006]